CAJ | 학술논문

　　研究目的：了解已有农村地权冲突研究的主要观点、论证逻辑及对策主张，加强对当前农村地权冲突的认识。研究方法：文献研究法。研究结果：经济学、法学、政治社会学与人类学分别运用了不同的分析视角、论证逻辑来研究农村地权冲突，这些研究最后得出的观点与结论存在较大差异。研究结论：经济学认为土地产权的清晰界定是减少地权冲突的关键，法学主张通过修订土地产权性质的法律表述、增进法律条文之间的内在衔接来减少地权冲突，政治社会学研究了社会转型期土地利益群体分化、土地规则不确定性等对于地权冲突的影响，人类学则主要关注地权观念紊乱对于农村地权冲突的冲击。总体来看，经济学与法学的研究具有较大的相似性，主要运用了“侵权—反抗”的分析框架；政治社会学与人类学的研究则可以归类为“转型—失范”的分析框架。
　　연구목적：료해이유농촌지권충돌연구적주요관점、론증라집급대책주장，가강대당전농촌지권충돌적인식。연구방법：문헌연구법。연구결과：경제학、법학、정치사회학여인류학분별운용료불동적분석시각、론증라집래연구농촌지권충돌，저사연구최후득출적관점여결론존재교대차이。연구결론：경제학인위토지산권적청석계정시감소지권충돌적관건，법학주장통과수정토지산권성질적법률표술、증진법률조문지간적내재함접래감소지권충돌，정치사회학연구료사회전형기토지이익군체분화、토지규칙불학정성등대우지권충돌적영향，인류학칙주요관주지권관념문란대우농촌지권충돌적충격。총체래간，경제학여법학적연구구유교대적상사성，주요운용료“침권—반항”적분석광가；정치사회학여인류학적연구칙가이귀류위“전형—실범”적분석광가。
The purpose of this paper is to summarize the viewpoints, argumentation and conclusion of the literature on land ownership conflicts in rural China, aiming to strengthen the awareness on the issue. Method of documentation is em-ployed. The results indicate that significantly different results and conclusions are made by scholars from economics, law, political sociology and anthropology. Economists pay attention to the definition of land property rights as the precondition to reduce these conflicts. Jurisprudential scholars consider the ambiguous expressions of law are the essential reasons for the conflicts. Researchers from political sociology focus on the impacts of the differentiation of land interest groups and the uncertainty of land rules on the land ownership conflicts. Anthropologists pay attention to the influence of distorted ideology on land property rights. The paper thus concludes that studies based on economics and jurisprudence are quite similar regarding the“infringement-resistance”framework, meanwhile studies from political sociology and anthropology are similar due to using the“transition-anomie”framework.