中国烧伤创疡杂志
中國燒傷創瘍雜誌
중국소상창양잡지
2001年
2期
85-87
,共3页
烧伤%非MEBO创面%MEBT/MEBO%治疗
燒傷%非MEBO創麵%MEBT/MEBO%治療
소상%비MEBO창면%MEBT/MEBO%치료
目的:观察烧伤早期未采用湿润烧伤膏治疗的创面,更换烧伤湿润暴露疗法 (MEBT/MEBO)的疗效.方法:对 30例非 MEBO治疗的烧伤创面,一律更换为 MEBT/MEBO治疗,根据创面情况及时清除“药痂”,或伍用耕耘疗法.结果:创面形成的药痂或污物溶解迅速,易于清除,痂下积脓消失;各种类型的创面均能在预期内愈合;其中 2例Ⅲ度创面经植皮治疗愈合;深Ⅱ度皮肤色素减退者 14例 (70% ),瘢痕增生率为 25. 0% (5/20);Ⅲ度创面均留有浅表型瘢痕.结论:非 MEBO治疗的烧伤创面及时更换 MEBT/MEBO治疗,具有良好的清除创面药痂污物及积脓等作用;但深Ⅱ度创面与早期实行 MEBT/MEBO相比,瘢痕发生率偏高.
目的:觀察燒傷早期未採用濕潤燒傷膏治療的創麵,更換燒傷濕潤暴露療法 (MEBT/MEBO)的療效.方法:對 30例非 MEBO治療的燒傷創麵,一律更換為 MEBT/MEBO治療,根據創麵情況及時清除“藥痂”,或伍用耕耘療法.結果:創麵形成的藥痂或汙物溶解迅速,易于清除,痂下積膿消失;各種類型的創麵均能在預期內愈閤;其中 2例Ⅲ度創麵經植皮治療愈閤;深Ⅱ度皮膚色素減退者 14例 (70% ),瘢痕增生率為 25. 0% (5/20);Ⅲ度創麵均留有淺錶型瘢痕.結論:非 MEBO治療的燒傷創麵及時更換 MEBT/MEBO治療,具有良好的清除創麵藥痂汙物及積膿等作用;但深Ⅱ度創麵與早期實行 MEBT/MEBO相比,瘢痕髮生率偏高.
목적:관찰소상조기미채용습윤소상고치료적창면,경환소상습윤폭로요법 (MEBT/MEBO)적료효.방법:대 30례비 MEBO치료적소상창면,일률경환위 MEBT/MEBO치료,근거창면정황급시청제“약가”,혹오용경운요법.결과:창면형성적약가혹오물용해신속,역우청제,가하적농소실;각충류형적창면균능재예기내유합;기중 2례Ⅲ도창면경식피치료유합;심Ⅱ도피부색소감퇴자 14례 (70% ),반흔증생솔위 25. 0% (5/20);Ⅲ도창면균류유천표형반흔.결론:비 MEBO치료적소상창면급시경환 MEBT/MEBO치료,구유량호적청제창면약가오물급적농등작용;단심Ⅱ도창면여조기실행 MEBT/MEBO상비,반흔발생솔편고.
Objective: To observe the efficacy of MEBO in treating burn wounds previously treated with non-MEBO method. Method: 30 cases of burn had previously been treated with non-MEBO method were then treated with MEBT/MEBO. The wounds were timely cleaned to remove the residual "drug scab" and Ploughing method was applied where necessary. Results: After application of MEBT/MEBO, the wounds were easy to clean and the “ drug scab” easy to remove. The subcrustal empyema vanished. All the wounds healed as expected. 2 cases with 3rd degree wound healed after skin grafting. 14 cases with deep 2nd degree wound had skin pigment faded (70% ). Hyperplastic scar formation rate was 25.0% (% /20). Third degree wounds healed with superficial type scar. Conclusion: When MEBT/MEBO was applied timely in treating burn wounds previously treated with non-MEBO method, the "drug scab" and contaminants could be cleaned easily and the empyema removed timely. For deep 2nd degree wounds previously treated with non-MEBO method, the scar formation rate was higher than those treated directly with MEBT/MEBO.