CAJ | 학술논문

前人对《荀子》注释的精义固多，却也难免还存在着缪误。通过对《苟子》各家注本失误的具体分析，侧面反映了唐代杨俅以来注释家们在理论、方法上所存在的缺陷及流弊，以期为探索传统训诂学的科学化道路提供一些反面的借鉴。
전인대《순자》주석적정의고다，각야난면환존재착무오。통과대《구자》각가주본실오적구체분석，측면반영료당대양구이래주석가문재이론、방법상소존재적결함급류폐，이기위탐색전통훈고학적과학화도로제공일사반면적차감。
There were no doubt many precise notes of Xunzi by the predecessors, but it is inevitable there were some mistakes in them. The specific analysis of the errors in each Xunzi note , shows all the defects and abuses in theory and methods since Yang Jing of Tang Dynasty the commentators had. Hopefully, these will serve some nega- tive reference for exploring the traditional exegesis in a scientific way.