干旱地区农业研究
榦旱地區農業研究
간한지구농업연구
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE ARID AREAS
2010年
1期
175-179,192
,共6页
刘慧%潘志华%周蒙蒙%张璐阳%安萍莉%潘学标%妥德宝%赵沛义
劉慧%潘誌華%週矇矇%張璐暘%安萍莉%潘學標%妥德寶%趙沛義
류혜%반지화%주몽몽%장로양%안평리%반학표%타덕보%조패의
农牧交错带%退耕方式%生态系统健康
農牧交錯帶%退耕方式%生態繫統健康
농목교착대%퇴경방식%생태계통건강
the Northern Agro-grazing Ecotone%different ways of returning farmland into other uses%ecological health
以北方农牧交错带武川县为例,针对不同的土地利用方式,对其影响下的生态系统健康状况进行综合评价.选择天然草地、退耕还灌地(柠条地)、退耕还草地(苜蓿地)三类具有代表性的土地类型为研究对象,采用生态系统健康的理论和评价方法,选用生物量、生物多样性指数、土壤含水量和土壤养分含量等指标,从生态系统的活力、组织力和恢复力三方面,对生态系统的健康状况进行了分析比较.结果表明:天然草地具有最高的活力和组织力;两种退耕方式对生态系统活力的影响没有显著差别;退耕还灌较退耕还草地具有较高的物种多样性;退耕还草比退耕还灌消耗更多的土壤水分;两种退耕方式对土壤养分的影响不显著.从水分涵养的角度看,当前退耕还灌较退耕还草好.
以北方農牧交錯帶武川縣為例,針對不同的土地利用方式,對其影響下的生態繫統健康狀況進行綜閤評價.選擇天然草地、退耕還灌地(檸條地)、退耕還草地(苜蓿地)三類具有代錶性的土地類型為研究對象,採用生態繫統健康的理論和評價方法,選用生物量、生物多樣性指數、土壤含水量和土壤養分含量等指標,從生態繫統的活力、組織力和恢複力三方麵,對生態繫統的健康狀況進行瞭分析比較.結果錶明:天然草地具有最高的活力和組織力;兩種退耕方式對生態繫統活力的影響沒有顯著差彆;退耕還灌較退耕還草地具有較高的物種多樣性;退耕還草比退耕還灌消耗更多的土壤水分;兩種退耕方式對土壤養分的影響不顯著.從水分涵養的角度看,噹前退耕還灌較退耕還草好.
이북방농목교착대무천현위례,침대불동적토지이용방식,대기영향하적생태계통건강상황진행종합평개.선택천연초지、퇴경환관지(저조지)、퇴경환초지(목숙지)삼류구유대표성적토지류형위연구대상,채용생태계통건강적이론화평개방법,선용생물량、생물다양성지수、토양함수량화토양양분함량등지표,종생태계통적활력、조직력화회복력삼방면,대생태계통적건강상황진행료분석비교.결과표명:천연초지구유최고적활력화조직력;량충퇴경방식대생태계통활력적영향몰유현저차별;퇴경환관교퇴경환초지구유교고적물충다양성;퇴경환초비퇴경환관소모경다적토양수분;량충퇴경방식대토양양분적영향불현저.종수분함양적각도간,당전퇴경환관교퇴경환초호.
Influences of different land use patterns on ecosystem health are analyzed in the Northern Agro-grazing Ecotone. With Wuchuan County as a case study, three types of land were chosen as the sample plots, namely natural grassland, grassland (Medicago sativa L.) returned from farmland and shrub land (Caragana Korshinskii Kom.) returned from farmland. According to the theory of ecosystem health, the factors which influenced the ecosystem health greatly, vigor, organization and resilience of ecosystem were put forward. The biomass represented vigor, the biodiversity represented organization and the soil water and nutrient represented the resilience. It was showed that the vigor and organization of the natural grassland was the highest of all. There was no obvious difference of effect on vigor under two returning methods; the diversity of the vegetation of shrub land returned from farmland was more than the grassland returned from farmland; water consumption of the grassland returned from farmland was more than the shrub land returned from farmland; two returning methods had no obvious difference of effect on soil nutrient. In terms of conserving water, the shrub land returned from farmland was better than the grassland returned from farmland.