北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大學學報(醫學版)
북경대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF PEAKING UNIVERSITY(HEALTH SCIENCES)
2003年
3期
236-240
,共5页
张蔚婷%罗非%亓颖伟%王颖%张景渝%Donald J.WOODWORD%陈昭燃%韩济生
張蔚婷%囉非%亓穎偉%王穎%張景渝%Donald J.WOODWORD%陳昭燃%韓濟生
장위정%라비%기영위%왕영%장경투%Donald J.WOODWORD%진소연%한제생
脑电图%频谱分析%θ节律%β节律%针刺
腦電圖%頻譜分析%θ節律%β節律%針刺
뇌전도%빈보분석%θ절률%β절률%침자
Electroencephalogram%Power spectrum%theta rhythm%beta rhythm%Acupuncture
目的:利用64通道脑电图记录与分析系统探讨经皮穴位电刺激对镇痛相关的脑电活动的调制作用.方法:共15名健康青年被试参加了本研究.每名被试进行两轮实验,分别接受穴位电刺激和对照刺激(非穴位刺激).在治疗前后分别接受中等程度的疼痛刺激,并对每次疼痛刺激的强度进行评分.记录治疗前、中、后的脑电信号并进行频谱分析.结果:穴位电刺激时刺激对侧的中央及顶叶皮层θ波与治疗后的疼痛评分有负相关性,即疼痛评分越低或镇痛效果越好,则该脑区的θ波成分越多;类似的,穴位刺激时对侧前额叶、同侧额叶下部、颞叶和顶枕叶的β波也与治疗后的疼痛评分有负相关性.相反,在对照刺激时的脑电图没有发现类似的相关性.结论:脑电图频谱分析揭示穴位电刺激对某些特定脑区的疼痛信号处理过程具有一定的调制作用,这可能是针刺镇痛的机制之一.
目的:利用64通道腦電圖記錄與分析繫統探討經皮穴位電刺激對鎮痛相關的腦電活動的調製作用.方法:共15名健康青年被試參加瞭本研究.每名被試進行兩輪實驗,分彆接受穴位電刺激和對照刺激(非穴位刺激).在治療前後分彆接受中等程度的疼痛刺激,併對每次疼痛刺激的彊度進行評分.記錄治療前、中、後的腦電信號併進行頻譜分析.結果:穴位電刺激時刺激對側的中央及頂葉皮層θ波與治療後的疼痛評分有負相關性,即疼痛評分越低或鎮痛效果越好,則該腦區的θ波成分越多;類似的,穴位刺激時對側前額葉、同側額葉下部、顳葉和頂枕葉的β波也與治療後的疼痛評分有負相關性.相反,在對照刺激時的腦電圖沒有髮現類似的相關性.結論:腦電圖頻譜分析揭示穴位電刺激對某些特定腦區的疼痛信號處理過程具有一定的調製作用,這可能是針刺鎮痛的機製之一.
목적:이용64통도뇌전도기록여분석계통탐토경피혈위전자격대진통상관적뇌전활동적조제작용.방법:공15명건강청년피시삼가료본연구.매명피시진행량륜실험,분별접수혈위전자격화대조자격(비혈위자격).재치료전후분별접수중등정도적동통자격,병대매차동통자격적강도진행평분.기록치료전、중、후적뇌전신호병진행빈보분석.결과:혈위전자격시자격대측적중앙급정협피층θ파여치료후적동통평분유부상관성,즉동통평분월저혹진통효과월호,칙해뇌구적θ파성분월다;유사적,혈위자격시대측전액협、동측액협하부、섭협화정침협적β파야여치료후적동통평분유부상관성.상반,재대조자격시적뇌전도몰유발현유사적상관성.결론:뇌전도빈보분석게시혈위전자격대모사특정뇌구적동통신호처리과정구유일정적조제작용,저가능시침자진통적궤제지일.
SUMMARY Objective: To investigate the analgesia-related modulation of electroencephalographic activities by transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation (EAS). Methods: In 15 healthy human beings, 64-channel electroencephalogram was recorded and power spectrum analysis was employed before, during and after EAS. Non-acupoint electric stimulation was used as control. All subjects were asked to rate their sensation to painful stimulations before and after treatment. Results: The relative theta power near contra-lateral centro-parietal area during EAS was negatively correlated with the pain score after EAS. Similarly, the beta activity during EAS near contra-lateral prefrontal cortex, ipsi-lateral inferior frontal and temporal lobe, and ipsi-lateral occipito-parietal cortex, were all negatively correlated with pain score after EAS. Conclusion: These changes might reflect a modulation of brain activity by EAS in specific areas, which were in turn involved in modulation of certain aspects of pain-signal processing.