中国行为医学科学
中國行為醫學科學
중국행위의학과학
2008年
7期
606-608
,共3页
魏广和%李清贤%张金国%张慧玲%乔增勇%王悦强
魏廣和%李清賢%張金國%張慧玲%喬增勇%王悅彊
위엄화%리청현%장금국%장혜령%교증용%왕열강
心肌梗死,急性%就医行为
心肌梗死,急性%就醫行為
심기경사,급성%취의행위
Myocardial infarction,Acute%Hospitalizing behaviors
目的 了解急性心肌梗死患者就医行为及其对就医延误的影响.方法 采用自行设计的问卷调查表,对53例急诊行冠脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的就医行为、就诊时间及其对预后的影响进行了调查和分析.结果 (1)AMI患者院前延迟时间中位数为3.20h,≤2.00h者占30.19%,2.00h者占69.81%;就诊延迟时间中位数为4.00h,≤6.00h者占88.68%,6.00h者占11.32%.(2)发病后,症状归因于心脏病者占45.28%,归因于非心脏病者占43.40%,不知道者占11.32%,其院前延迟时间中位数分别为2.10h、3.20h和3.90h(P<0.01),就诊延迟时间中位数分别为3.50h、4.80h和5.90h(P<0.01);立即就诊者占32.08%,等待或自行治疗者占60.38%,向朋友家人家庭医生咨询者占7.54%,其院前延迟时间中位数分别为1.10h、3.50h和3.50h(P<0.01),就诊延迟时间中位数分别为3.00h、4.90h和6.00h(P<0.01);采用救护车转运者占54.72%,采用出租车、自家车等其他方式转运者占45.28%,其院前延迟时间中位数分别为2.20h和3.80h(P<0.01),就诊延迟时间中位数分别为3.70h和5.15 h(P<0.01);首诊于三级医院者占79.25%,首诊于二级医院者占11.32%,首诊于社区医院或诊所者占9.43%,其院前延迟时间中位数分别为2.55h、4.60h和4.00h(P<0.01),就诊延迟时间中位数分别为3.75 h、5.95 h和5.50h(P<0.01);立即选择PCI治疗者占66.04%,向朋友家人家庭医生咨询者占30.19%,等待或观察者占3.77%,其就诊延迟时间中位数分别为3.70h、11.00h和5.15h(P<0.01).(3)院前延迟时间≤2.00h者1年内心血管事件发生率明显低于2.00h者(0,27.03%,P<0.05).就诊延迟时间≤6.00h者1年内心血管事件发生率也明显低于6.00h者(14.89%,50.0%,P<0.05).结论 AMI患者目前仍存在不良就医行为,就医延误依然存在,且对预后产生不利影响,改善患者就医行为不容忽视.
目的 瞭解急性心肌梗死患者就醫行為及其對就醫延誤的影響.方法 採用自行設計的問捲調查錶,對53例急診行冠脈介入治療(PCI)的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的就醫行為、就診時間及其對預後的影響進行瞭調查和分析.結果 (1)AMI患者院前延遲時間中位數為3.20h,≤2.00h者佔30.19%,2.00h者佔69.81%;就診延遲時間中位數為4.00h,≤6.00h者佔88.68%,6.00h者佔11.32%.(2)髮病後,癥狀歸因于心髒病者佔45.28%,歸因于非心髒病者佔43.40%,不知道者佔11.32%,其院前延遲時間中位數分彆為2.10h、3.20h和3.90h(P<0.01),就診延遲時間中位數分彆為3.50h、4.80h和5.90h(P<0.01);立即就診者佔32.08%,等待或自行治療者佔60.38%,嚮朋友傢人傢庭醫生咨詢者佔7.54%,其院前延遲時間中位數分彆為1.10h、3.50h和3.50h(P<0.01),就診延遲時間中位數分彆為3.00h、4.90h和6.00h(P<0.01);採用救護車轉運者佔54.72%,採用齣租車、自傢車等其他方式轉運者佔45.28%,其院前延遲時間中位數分彆為2.20h和3.80h(P<0.01),就診延遲時間中位數分彆為3.70h和5.15 h(P<0.01);首診于三級醫院者佔79.25%,首診于二級醫院者佔11.32%,首診于社區醫院或診所者佔9.43%,其院前延遲時間中位數分彆為2.55h、4.60h和4.00h(P<0.01),就診延遲時間中位數分彆為3.75 h、5.95 h和5.50h(P<0.01);立即選擇PCI治療者佔66.04%,嚮朋友傢人傢庭醫生咨詢者佔30.19%,等待或觀察者佔3.77%,其就診延遲時間中位數分彆為3.70h、11.00h和5.15h(P<0.01).(3)院前延遲時間≤2.00h者1年內心血管事件髮生率明顯低于2.00h者(0,27.03%,P<0.05).就診延遲時間≤6.00h者1年內心血管事件髮生率也明顯低于6.00h者(14.89%,50.0%,P<0.05).結論 AMI患者目前仍存在不良就醫行為,就醫延誤依然存在,且對預後產生不利影響,改善患者就醫行為不容忽視.
목적 료해급성심기경사환자취의행위급기대취의연오적영향.방법 채용자행설계적문권조사표,대53례급진행관맥개입치료(PCI)적급성심기경사(AMI)환자적취의행위、취진시간급기대예후적영향진행료조사화분석.결과 (1)AMI환자원전연지시간중위수위3.20h,≤2.00h자점30.19%,2.00h자점69.81%;취진연지시간중위수위4.00h,≤6.00h자점88.68%,6.00h자점11.32%.(2)발병후,증상귀인우심장병자점45.28%,귀인우비심장병자점43.40%,불지도자점11.32%,기원전연지시간중위수분별위2.10h、3.20h화3.90h(P<0.01),취진연지시간중위수분별위3.50h、4.80h화5.90h(P<0.01);립즉취진자점32.08%,등대혹자행치료자점60.38%,향붕우가인가정의생자순자점7.54%,기원전연지시간중위수분별위1.10h、3.50h화3.50h(P<0.01),취진연지시간중위수분별위3.00h、4.90h화6.00h(P<0.01);채용구호차전운자점54.72%,채용출조차、자가차등기타방식전운자점45.28%,기원전연지시간중위수분별위2.20h화3.80h(P<0.01),취진연지시간중위수분별위3.70h화5.15 h(P<0.01);수진우삼급의원자점79.25%,수진우이급의원자점11.32%,수진우사구의원혹진소자점9.43%,기원전연지시간중위수분별위2.55h、4.60h화4.00h(P<0.01),취진연지시간중위수분별위3.75 h、5.95 h화5.50h(P<0.01);립즉선택PCI치료자점66.04%,향붕우가인가정의생자순자점30.19%,등대혹관찰자점3.77%,기취진연지시간중위수분별위3.70h、11.00h화5.15h(P<0.01).(3)원전연지시간≤2.00h자1년내심혈관사건발생솔명현저우2.00h자(0,27.03%,P<0.05).취진연지시간≤6.00h자1년내심혈관사건발생솔야명현저우6.00h자(14.89%,50.0%,P<0.05).결론 AMI환자목전잉존재불량취의행위,취의연오의연존재,차대예후산생불리영향,개선환자취의행위불용홀시.
Objective To know about the hospitalizing behaviors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and the influence of that on delay to see doctor of patients. Methods The hospitalizing behaviors, time to see doctor and cardiovascular events of 53 AMI patients were investigated by questionary. Results The median time of prehospital delay in 53 patients with AMI was 3.20h. Meanwhile there were 16 patients(30.19%) whose median time of prehospital delay ≤ 2.00 h, and there were 37 patients(69.81%) whose median time of prehospital delay 2.00 h. The median time of treatment-seeking delay in 53 patients with AMI was 4.00 h. Meanwhere there were 47 patients (88.68%) whose median time of treatment-seeking delay ≤6.0Oh,and there were 6 patients (11.32%) whose median time of treatment-seeking delay 6.00 h. There were very significant difference on the time of prehospital delay and treatment-seeking delay among different hospitalizing behaviors in patients with AMI (P<0.01). The cardiovascular event incidence in the patients whose median time of prehospital delay ≤ 2.00h significant less than those whose median time of prehospital delay 2.00 h. (0 vs 27.03%, P < 0.05). The cardiovascular event incidence in the patients whose median time of treatment-seeking delay≤6.00h significant less than those whose median time of treatment-seeking delay 6.00 h. (14.89% vs 50.0% , P < 0.05). Conclusion AMI patient still has bad hospitalizing behaviors at present. Treatment-seeking delay still exists,and adversely affect prognosis.