中国实用眼科杂志
中國實用眼科雜誌
중국실용안과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2010年
9期
972-974
,共3页
李俊%贾丽丽%戴友林%尹茶仙%陆斌
李俊%賈麗麗%戴友林%尹茶仙%陸斌
리준%가려려%대우림%윤다선%륙빈
微小异物%超声生物显微镜%裂隙显微镜%B超%CT
微小異物%超聲生物顯微鏡%裂隙顯微鏡%B超%CT
미소이물%초성생물현미경%렬극현미경%B초%CT
Foreign microbody%Slit lamp microscopy%Ultrasound biomicroscopy%B-scan ultrasonography%Computer tomography
目的 探讨超声生物显微镜检测和定位巩膜微小异物的价值.方法 对26例裂隙显微镜或和UBM检查发现,但薄层CT和常规B超检查无阳性特征的巩膜微小异物的临床和影像学特征进行回顾性分析.结果 巩膜微小异物分为四类:第一类(10例):大于0.2mm,不透明,和巩膜背景对比明显,常规裂隙显微镜检查容易发现,UBM检查阳性;第二类(8例):小于0.2mm,不透明,和巩膜背景对比明显,常规裂隙显微镜检查发现,UBM无阳性特征;第三类(6例):大于0.2mm,透明或半透明,和巩膜背景对比不明显,常规裂隙显微镜初步检查未发现,但UBM检查发现;第四类(2例):小于0.2mm,透明或半透明异物,和巩膜背景对比不明显,常规裂隙显微镜检查难以发现,UBM检查阴性,高倍裂隙显微镜检查发现.结论 UBM能发现薄层CT、常规B超等检查不能发现的巩膜0.2mm以上的微小异物,弥补常规裂隙显微镜检查不足,代替对巩膜异物的手术探查.
目的 探討超聲生物顯微鏡檢測和定位鞏膜微小異物的價值.方法 對26例裂隙顯微鏡或和UBM檢查髮現,但薄層CT和常規B超檢查無暘性特徵的鞏膜微小異物的臨床和影像學特徵進行迴顧性分析.結果 鞏膜微小異物分為四類:第一類(10例):大于0.2mm,不透明,和鞏膜揹景對比明顯,常規裂隙顯微鏡檢查容易髮現,UBM檢查暘性;第二類(8例):小于0.2mm,不透明,和鞏膜揹景對比明顯,常規裂隙顯微鏡檢查髮現,UBM無暘性特徵;第三類(6例):大于0.2mm,透明或半透明,和鞏膜揹景對比不明顯,常規裂隙顯微鏡初步檢查未髮現,但UBM檢查髮現;第四類(2例):小于0.2mm,透明或半透明異物,和鞏膜揹景對比不明顯,常規裂隙顯微鏡檢查難以髮現,UBM檢查陰性,高倍裂隙顯微鏡檢查髮現.結論 UBM能髮現薄層CT、常規B超等檢查不能髮現的鞏膜0.2mm以上的微小異物,瀰補常規裂隙顯微鏡檢查不足,代替對鞏膜異物的手術探查.
목적 탐토초성생물현미경검측화정위공막미소이물적개치.방법 대26례렬극현미경혹화UBM검사발현,단박층CT화상규B초검사무양성특정적공막미소이물적림상화영상학특정진행회고성분석.결과 공막미소이물분위사류:제일류(10례):대우0.2mm,불투명,화공막배경대비명현,상규렬극현미경검사용역발현,UBM검사양성;제이류(8례):소우0.2mm,불투명,화공막배경대비명현,상규렬극현미경검사발현,UBM무양성특정;제삼류(6례):대우0.2mm,투명혹반투명,화공막배경대비불명현,상규렬극현미경초보검사미발현,단UBM검사발현;제사류(2례):소우0.2mm,투명혹반투명이물,화공막배경대비불명현,상규렬극현미경검사난이발현,UBM검사음성,고배렬극현미경검사발현.결론 UBM능발현박층CT、상규B초등검사불능발현적공막0.2mm이상적미소이물,미보상규렬극현미경검사불족,대체대공막이물적수술탐사.
Objective To investigate the role of ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in diagnosing scleral foreign microbodies (SFMBs). Methods The characteristics of 26 cases of traumatic patients with SFMBs diagnosed by slit lamp microscope (SLM) or UBM were analyzed. Results SFMBs were divided into four categories. Class Ⅰ (10 cases) was more than 0.2mm, opaque in most cases, diagnosed by SLM and UBM; Class Ⅱ (8 cases) was less than 0.2mm, opaque or translucent, diagnosed by SLM, but not by UBM; Class Ⅲ (6 cases)was more than 0.2mm, transparent or translucent, diagnosed by UBM, but not by conventional SLM; Class Ⅳ (2 cases) was less than 0.2mm, transparent or translucent, found by high-resolution SLM, but not by UBM and conventional SLM. Conclusions UBM is a valuable adjunct for diagnosing SFMBs which are more than 0.2mm, even substitute operative exploration.