东南大学学报(英文版)
東南大學學報(英文版)
동남대학학보(영문판)
JOURNAL OF SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY
2012年
3期
360-366
,共7页
组织治理结构%组织控制%资源基础观点%交易成本经济学%研发联盟
組織治理結構%組織控製%資源基礎觀點%交易成本經濟學%研髮聯盟
조직치리결구%조직공제%자원기출관점%교역성본경제학%연발련맹
organizational governance structure%organizational control%resource-based review%transaction cost economics%R&D alliance
由于传统的理论将治理结构分为“等级、市场”或是“股权、非股权”等,而这些分类方式并不能充分描述研发联盟治理结构的特点,因此本研究首先解释在研发联盟当中,为何必须存在不同的组织治理结构类型;继而探讨在面对不同特性的研发联盟时,如何选择适当的治理结构类型.结合交易成本经济学理论与资源基础观点,推导出影响研发联盟组织治理结构的6个主要因子,分别为技术不确定性、文化差异、资产特殊性、技术的互补性、个别公司独门技术的研发专用性、信任,据此建立本研究模型.当研发联盟的技术不确定性较高、文化差异较大、独门技术的研发专用性有较多的防范时,则采用非集中联盟;当研发联盟的资产特殊性较高、技术的互补性较大、伙伴之间的信任度较高时,则采用集中联盟.搭配这些因子的特性选择组织治理结构类型,则研发联盟有更好的绩效,反之亦然.
由于傳統的理論將治理結構分為“等級、市場”或是“股權、非股權”等,而這些分類方式併不能充分描述研髮聯盟治理結構的特點,因此本研究首先解釋在研髮聯盟噹中,為何必鬚存在不同的組織治理結構類型;繼而探討在麵對不同特性的研髮聯盟時,如何選擇適噹的治理結構類型.結閤交易成本經濟學理論與資源基礎觀點,推導齣影響研髮聯盟組織治理結構的6箇主要因子,分彆為技術不確定性、文化差異、資產特殊性、技術的互補性、箇彆公司獨門技術的研髮專用性、信任,據此建立本研究模型.噹研髮聯盟的技術不確定性較高、文化差異較大、獨門技術的研髮專用性有較多的防範時,則採用非集中聯盟;噹研髮聯盟的資產特殊性較高、技術的互補性較大、夥伴之間的信任度較高時,則採用集中聯盟.搭配這些因子的特性選擇組織治理結構類型,則研髮聯盟有更好的績效,反之亦然.
유우전통적이론장치리결구분위“등급、시장”혹시“고권、비고권”등,이저사분류방식병불능충분묘술연발련맹치리결구적특점,인차본연구수선해석재연발련맹당중,위하필수존재불동적조직치리결구류형;계이탐토재면대불동특성적연발련맹시,여하선택괄당적치리결구류형.결합교역성본경제학이론여자원기출관점,추도출영향연발련맹조직치리결구적6개주요인자,분별위기술불학정성、문화차이、자산특수성、기술적호보성、개별공사독문기술적연발전용성、신임,거차건립본연구모형.당연발련맹적기술불학정성교고、문화차이교대、독문기술적연발전용성유교다적방범시,칙채용비집중련맹;당연발련맹적자산특수성교고、기술적호보성교대、화반지간적신임도교고시,칙채용집중련맹.탑배저사인자적특성선택조직치리결구류형,칙연발련맹유경호적적효,반지역연.
Traditionally governance structures are classified into "hierarchy or market" or "equity or non-equity."However, such classifications may not be effective in characterizing all governance structures of research and development (R&D) alliances.Therefore,the first objective of this study is to investigate why there exist different organizational governance structures in managing R&D alliances; the second objective of this study is to give strategic advice in choosing appropriate forms with respect to various characteristics of R&D alliances.Through the theoretical lens that integrate both transaction cost economics (TCE) and the resource-based view (RBV),a model that focuses on six major factors is developed for determining governance structure choices,namely,technological uncertainty,cultural difference, asset specificity, technology complementarity,appropriability of the individual firm's know-how,and trust.An R&D alliance with higher technological uncertainty,larger cultural differences, and greater concerns for protecting an individual's know-how is more likely to adopt non-integrated alliances as the governing structure.An R&D alliance with a higher degree of asset-specificity, greater technology complementarity and greater trust among partnering organizations is more likely to adopt integrated alliances as the governing structure; an R&D alliance in the face of lower technological uncertainty will tend to adopt integrated alliances.The more aligned the choice of the governance structure with its determinants,the better the R&D alliance will perform,and vice versa.