中华泌尿外科杂志
中華泌尿外科雜誌
중화비뇨외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
2009年
7期
457-460
,共4页
戚德峰%曾国华%袁坚%王露萍%单帜昌%李逊%吴开俊
慼德峰%曾國華%袁堅%王露萍%單幟昌%李遜%吳開俊
척덕봉%증국화%원견%왕로평%단치창%리손%오개준
输尿管结石%腔内镜%治疗
輸尿管結石%腔內鏡%治療
수뇨관결석%강내경%치료
Ureteral calculi%Endoscopy%Treatment
目的 评估腔内分期治疗难治性输尿管结石安全性和临床疗效. 方法 腔内分期治疗难治性输尿管结石患者18例.男11例.女7例.年龄2~65岁,平均32岁.双侧结石2例.结石位于输尿管上段11侧、中段6侧、下段3侧.结石直径0.4~1.6 cm,平均0.9 cm.患者因输尿管扭曲、先天性狭细无法行输尿管镜下碎石取石或体外冲击波碎石失败而采取腔内分期治疗.18例第1次手术均被迫单纯留置输尿管内支架或经皮肾造瘘;第2次或第3次再行腔内治疗处理结石.结果 第1次手术后40~50 d行第2次手术,结石取净13例,第2次手术后50~60 d行第3次手术,结石取净5例.18例均无术中和术后并发症,18例取出内支架后随访6个月,未发现结石复发.结论 采取腔内分期治疗难治件输尿管结石安全可行.
目的 評估腔內分期治療難治性輸尿管結石安全性和臨床療效. 方法 腔內分期治療難治性輸尿管結石患者18例.男11例.女7例.年齡2~65歲,平均32歲.雙側結石2例.結石位于輸尿管上段11側、中段6側、下段3側.結石直徑0.4~1.6 cm,平均0.9 cm.患者因輸尿管扭麯、先天性狹細無法行輸尿管鏡下碎石取石或體外遲擊波碎石失敗而採取腔內分期治療.18例第1次手術均被迫單純留置輸尿管內支架或經皮腎造瘺;第2次或第3次再行腔內治療處理結石.結果 第1次手術後40~50 d行第2次手術,結石取淨13例,第2次手術後50~60 d行第3次手術,結石取淨5例.18例均無術中和術後併髮癥,18例取齣內支架後隨訪6箇月,未髮現結石複髮.結論 採取腔內分期治療難治件輸尿管結石安全可行.
목적 평고강내분기치료난치성수뇨관결석안전성화림상료효. 방법 강내분기치료난치성수뇨관결석환자18례.남11례.녀7례.년령2~65세,평균32세.쌍측결석2례.결석위우수뇨관상단11측、중단6측、하단3측.결석직경0.4~1.6 cm,평균0.9 cm.환자인수뇨관뉴곡、선천성협세무법행수뇨관경하쇄석취석혹체외충격파쇄석실패이채취강내분기치료.18례제1차수술균피박단순류치수뇨관내지가혹경피신조루;제2차혹제3차재행강내치료처리결석.결과 제1차수술후40~50 d행제2차수술,결석취정13례,제2차수술후50~60 d행제3차수술,결석취정5례.18례균무술중화술후병발증,18례취출내지가후수방6개월,미발현결석복발.결론 채취강내분기치료난치건수뇨관결석안전가행.
Objective To investigate the feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy of staged endo-scopic treatment for refractory ureteral calculus. Methods Eighteen refractory ureteral calculus ea-ses (11 males and 7 females) treated with staged endoscopic treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 32 years (range 2-65 years). Of the 18 cases, 2 had bilateral ure-teral calculi. Of the 20 ureteral calculi, 11 were in the upper, 6 were in the middle and 3 in the lower part of ureter. The mean diameter of the calculi was 0.9 cm (range 0.4-1.6 cm). Staged endoscopic treatment was offered to patients because of failure of ureterscopic lithotripsy or extracoporeal shock-wave lithotrispy caused by uretreal twist or eongential narrow. For all the cases, it was hard to com-pletely clear all the stone load and ureteral stents or percutaneous nephrostomy were performed to drain the kidney in the first session. Then, the calculi were removed by endoscopic manipulations in the second or third session. Results Thirteen patient's calculi were completely cleared in the second sessions 40-50 d after the first operation. The other 5 cases had to accept the third session 50-60 d after the second operations. There was no intra- or post-operative complication in all cases. During the 6 months' follow-up, there was no sign of recurrence. Conclusion Staged endoscopic treatment is a feasible and safe method and has high efficiency in the management of refractory ureteral calculi.