中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2009年
7期
621-622
,共2页
张淑芳%缪绍疆%童俊%王牮%张红%王鹏%向东方%汤炯%丁瑞佳
張淑芳%繆紹疆%童俊%王牮%張紅%王鵬%嚮東方%湯炯%丁瑞佳
장숙방%무소강%동준%왕천%장홍%왕붕%향동방%탕형%정서가
抑郁症%掩饰%防御方式%明尼苏达多项人格调查表%防御方式问卷
抑鬱癥%掩飾%防禦方式%明尼囌達多項人格調查錶%防禦方式問捲
억욱증%엄식%방어방식%명니소체다항인격조사표%방어방식문권
Depression%Disguise%Defense mechanism%MMPI%DSQ
目的 探讨抑郁症患者的掩饰特点与防御方式.方法 采用明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MMPI)和防御方式问卷(DSQ)分别对50名抑郁症患者进行测查.结果 不同性别抑郁症患者的诈病分有差异(P<0.05);不成熟的防御方式与诈病分高正相关(r=0.633,P<0.01),与校正分高负相关(r=-0.533,P<0.01),与掩饰分高正相关(r=0.612,P(0.01),中间型防御方式与诈病分高正相关(r=0.426,P<0.01),与校正分负相关(r=-0.313,P<0.05);F-K分与不成熟防御方式高正相关(r=O.698,P<0.01)、与中间型防御方式高正相关(r=0.448,P<0.01),与掩饰分正相关(r=0.395,P<0.05);以F-K为因变量的多元回归分析结果显示,投射、隔离、压抑可以解释F-K分50.8%的变异量,投射的解释量为36.8%.结论 抑郁症患者夸大的精神病理与不成熟的防御方式和中间型防御方式有关.
目的 探討抑鬱癥患者的掩飾特點與防禦方式.方法 採用明尼囌達多項人格調查錶(MMPI)和防禦方式問捲(DSQ)分彆對50名抑鬱癥患者進行測查.結果 不同性彆抑鬱癥患者的詐病分有差異(P<0.05);不成熟的防禦方式與詐病分高正相關(r=0.633,P<0.01),與校正分高負相關(r=-0.533,P<0.01),與掩飾分高正相關(r=0.612,P(0.01),中間型防禦方式與詐病分高正相關(r=0.426,P<0.01),與校正分負相關(r=-0.313,P<0.05);F-K分與不成熟防禦方式高正相關(r=O.698,P<0.01)、與中間型防禦方式高正相關(r=0.448,P<0.01),與掩飾分正相關(r=0.395,P<0.05);以F-K為因變量的多元迴歸分析結果顯示,投射、隔離、壓抑可以解釋F-K分50.8%的變異量,投射的解釋量為36.8%.結論 抑鬱癥患者誇大的精神病理與不成熟的防禦方式和中間型防禦方式有關.
목적 탐토억욱증환자적엄식특점여방어방식.방법 채용명니소체다항인격조사표(MMPI)화방어방식문권(DSQ)분별대50명억욱증환자진행측사.결과 불동성별억욱증환자적사병분유차이(P<0.05);불성숙적방어방식여사병분고정상관(r=0.633,P<0.01),여교정분고부상관(r=-0.533,P<0.01),여엄식분고정상관(r=0.612,P(0.01),중간형방어방식여사병분고정상관(r=0.426,P<0.01),여교정분부상관(r=-0.313,P<0.05);F-K분여불성숙방어방식고정상관(r=O.698,P<0.01)、여중간형방어방식고정상관(r=0.448,P<0.01),여엄식분정상관(r=0.395,P<0.05);이F-K위인변량적다원회귀분석결과현시,투사、격리、압억가이해석F-K분50.8%적변이량,투사적해석량위36.8%.결론 억욱증환자과대적정신병리여불성숙적방어방식화중간형방어방식유관.
Objective To find out some distinct defense style in depression patients and the correlation between disguise and defense of them. Methods MMPI and DSQ questionnaire was administrated to 50 patients suffering from depression. Results There was difference in F scores between male and female (t =0.036, P <0.05 ). The premature defense style was significant positively related to malingering scores (r=0.633, P <0.01)and disguise scores (r=0.612, P<0.01), and significant negatively related to correction scores(r=-0. 533, P <0.01). The median defense style was significant positively related to malingering scores ( r = 0.426, P <0.01), and negatively related to correction scores(r=-0.313, P < 0.05 ). F-K factor was positive related with premature, median and disguise factors with statistical significance.(r=0.698, P<0.01;r=0.448, P <0.01 ; r = 0.395, P <0.05). By multiple regression analysis,50.8% variation of F-K scores could be explained by pro-jection, isolation and repression variables. Conclusion The grandiosity in psychopathology in these patients is related with lack of the mature defense style and disguise.