中国实用眼科杂志
中國實用眼科雜誌
중국실용안과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2010年
10期
1070-1073
,共4页
王柏敏%余敏斌%邓大明%李劲嵘%林羡钗%向晖
王柏敏%餘敏斌%鄧大明%李勁嶸%林羨釵%嚮暉
왕백민%여민빈%산대명%리경영%림이차%향휘
调节幅度%屈光度%优势眼%近视
調節幅度%屈光度%優勢眼%近視
조절폭도%굴광도%우세안%근시
Amplitude of accommodation%Diopter%Dominant eye%Myopia
目的 研究计算机阅读后的单眼调节幅度及其变化与屈光度、优势眼的关系.方法 30名受试者按不同屈光度、屈光参差状态、优势眼分组,均作连续计算机终端阅读2h,阅读前后分别查单眼调节幅度.结果 (1)连续2h计算机阅读前,调节幅度的大小与屈光度有相关性(r=0.439,P=0.003);阅读后,调节幅度的变化与屈光度无相关性(r=0.121,P=0.434).(2)计算机终端阅读前,优势眼的调节幅度大小与非优势眼调节幅度大小比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);阅读后,优势眼的调节幅度变化比非优势眼调节幅度变化大(P<0.05).(3)生理性屈光参差组和病理性屈光参差组两组内优势眼眼别与双眼中屈光不正度数较高或较低眼别之间无相关性(P>0.05).结论 计算机阅读前,调节幅度的大小与屈光度有相关性;计算机阅读后优势眼的调节幅度变化比非优势眼调节幅度变化大;优势眼眼别与双眼中屈光不正度数较高或较低眼别之间无相关.高调节幅度及优势眼可能并不是近视进展中的主要因素.
目的 研究計算機閱讀後的單眼調節幅度及其變化與屈光度、優勢眼的關繫.方法 30名受試者按不同屈光度、屈光參差狀態、優勢眼分組,均作連續計算機終耑閱讀2h,閱讀前後分彆查單眼調節幅度.結果 (1)連續2h計算機閱讀前,調節幅度的大小與屈光度有相關性(r=0.439,P=0.003);閱讀後,調節幅度的變化與屈光度無相關性(r=0.121,P=0.434).(2)計算機終耑閱讀前,優勢眼的調節幅度大小與非優勢眼調節幅度大小比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);閱讀後,優勢眼的調節幅度變化比非優勢眼調節幅度變化大(P<0.05).(3)生理性屈光參差組和病理性屈光參差組兩組內優勢眼眼彆與雙眼中屈光不正度數較高或較低眼彆之間無相關性(P>0.05).結論 計算機閱讀前,調節幅度的大小與屈光度有相關性;計算機閱讀後優勢眼的調節幅度變化比非優勢眼調節幅度變化大;優勢眼眼彆與雙眼中屈光不正度數較高或較低眼彆之間無相關.高調節幅度及優勢眼可能併不是近視進展中的主要因素.
목적 연구계산궤열독후적단안조절폭도급기변화여굴광도、우세안적관계.방법 30명수시자안불동굴광도、굴광삼차상태、우세안분조,균작련속계산궤종단열독2h,열독전후분별사단안조절폭도.결과 (1)련속2h계산궤열독전,조절폭도적대소여굴광도유상관성(r=0.439,P=0.003);열독후,조절폭도적변화여굴광도무상관성(r=0.121,P=0.434).(2)계산궤종단열독전,우세안적조절폭도대소여비우세안조절폭도대소비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);열독후,우세안적조절폭도변화비비우세안조절폭도변화대(P<0.05).(3)생이성굴광삼차조화병이성굴광삼차조량조내우세안안별여쌍안중굴광불정도수교고혹교저안별지간무상관성(P>0.05).결론 계산궤열독전,조절폭도적대소여굴광도유상관성;계산궤열독후우세안적조절폭도변화비비우세안조절폭도변화대;우세안안별여쌍안중굴광불정도수교고혹교저안별지간무상관.고조절폭도급우세안가능병불시근시진전중적주요인소.
Objective To study the relationship between amplitude of accommodation (AMP) and the diopter of dominant eye for computer terminal reader. Methods Thirty volunteers were divided into three groups according to degree of anisometropia, diopter and the dominant eye. They all underwent 2-hour continuous computer-based reading. On the same day before and after reading, AMP was measured. Results Before 2-hour continuous computer-based reading, positive correlations (r =0.439, P =0.003) were observed between AMP and diopters of myopia reftaction. However, after reading, no statistic significant correlation was observed between the change of AMP and refractive diopters (r=0.121, P=0.434). Before 2-hour continuous computer-based reading, no statistic significant correlation was observed on AMP between the dominant eye and the non-dominant eye (P >0.05). After reading, the change of AMP was higher in the dominant eye (P <0.05). No statistic significant correlation was observed between the dominant eye and the eye with higher or lower myopia fiom the physiological anisometropia group and the pathological anisometropia group (P >0.05). Conclusions Positive correlations are found between AMP and myopia diopters. The change of AMP is obvious in the dominant eye. High AMP and the dominant eye may not play main roles in myopia onset.