CAJ | 학술논문

目的了解接尘工人的防护行为,为接尘工人的健康教育提供参考依据.方法采用现场询问,调查员填写问卷的方法对唐山市机械制造、陶瓷、钢铁行业有代表性的3家企业的746名接尘工人进行调查.将所有数据录入计算机,整理数据后,用Excel建立数据库,应用SPSS11.5统计分析软件分析学历、工龄、培训与否等因素对防护行为的影响.结果唐山市接尘工人定期体检率和要求发放防护用品率分别为94.4%和75.3%,选择有效方式防护率较低(15.4%).不同学历接尘工人定期体检率比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).参加过粉尘防护知识培训的接尘工人选择有效方式防护率(20.3%),定期体检率(98.3%),要求发放防护用品率(86.4%)均高于未参加过培训的接尘工人(13.9%、93.1%、71.9%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05,P＜0.01).不同企业接尘工人的有效防护率、定期体检率及要求发放防护用品率比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论唐山市机械制造、冶金和陶瓷行业接尘工人选择有效方式防护率普遍较低.未参加过培训的接尘工作人员选择有效方式防护率、定期体检率和要求上级发放防护用品率较低.
목적 료해접진공인적방호행위,위접진공인적건강교육제공삼고의거.방법 채용현장순문,조사원전사문권적방법대당산시궤계제조、도자、강철행업유대표성적3가기업적746명접진공인진행조사.장소유수거록입계산궤,정리수거후,용Excel건립수거고,응용SPSS11.5통계분석연건분석학력、공령、배훈여부등인소대방호행위적영향.결과 당산시접진공인정기체검솔화요구발방방호용품솔분별위94.4%화75.3%,선택유효방식방호솔교저(15.4%).불동학력접진공인정기체검솔비교,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).삼가과분진방호지식배훈적접진공인선택유효방식방호솔(20.3%),정기체검솔(98.3%),요구발방방호용품솔(86.4%)균고우미삼가과배훈적접진공인(13.9%、93.1%、71.9%),차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05,P＜0.01).불동기업접진공인적유효방호솔、정기체검솔급요구발방방호용품솔비교,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 당산시궤계제조、야금화도자행업접진공인선택유효방식방호솔보편교저.미삼가과배훈적접진공작인원선택유효방식방호솔、정기체검솔화요구상급발방방호용품솔교저.
Objective The purposes of this thesis were to study the behavior about workers exposed to dust and provide scientific basis for health promotion. Methods We designed a questionnaire and carry it on the 746 dust workers in the 3 representative corporations of Machinery,Ceramic,and Metallurgy Industry.All data were input into computer. And a database was established with Excel. SPSS11.5 statistical analysis software was used to analyze the influence on protecting behavioral between the application of qualifications,different jobs, training or protection, and other aspects etc. Results The rates were 94.4% and 75.3% about the regular physical examination and requirements for protective equipment. The rate of choosing an effective way of protection was generally low (15.4%). There was significant difference for among different educational background workers (P＜0.01). The rates of choosing an effective way of protection (20.3%), the regular physical examination (98.3%) and requirements for protective equipment (86.4%) in the dust workers who participated in the training of dust protection were superior than those who did not participated in the training. There was the significant difference (P＜0.05 ,P＜0.01 ). There was the significant difference for the rate of effective way of protection, regular physical examination, and requirements for protective equipment among the different corporations (P＜0.05). Conclusions Dust workers' using rate about the choosing an effective way of protection was generally Iow in Machinery,Ceramic,and Metallurgy Industry. Those who were not educated had a lower using rate about the protection behavior, regular physical examination, and requirements for protective equipment than those educated.