中华创伤杂志
中華創傷雜誌
중화창상잡지
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
2009年
1期
25-28
,共4页
曾云记%潘志军%周浩%徐建杰
曾雲記%潘誌軍%週浩%徐建傑
증운기%반지군%주호%서건걸
骶髂关节%骨盆%内固定器%生物力学
骶髂關節%骨盆%內固定器%生物力學
저가관절%골분%내고정기%생물역학
Sacroiliac joint%Pelvis%Internal fixator%Biomechanics
目的 测量骶髂螺钉不同进针点置钉对骨盆外旋不稳定的生物力学影响,为临床应用提供试验依据.方法 10具新鲜冰冻成人骨盆标本,骶髂关节拉力螺钉经进针点B(髂后下棘前2.5 cm与坐骨大切迹上4.0 cm的交点)、A(B点同一水平面前方1.0 cm)、C(B点同一水平面后方1.0 cm)固定骶髂关节.测量骶髂关节前韧带完整组、A进针点组、B进针点组、C进针点组在相同外旋应力下骶髂关节、耻骨联合的分离距离,从而比较不同进针点的固定强度.结果 在对抗外旋力上,韧带完整组、C进针点组与A/B组差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);A、B进针点组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).在骶髂关节稳定性上,除韧带完整组、B进针点组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)外,余各组间差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 对骶髂关节稳定性B进针点更为优越,更为安全、有效.
目的 測量骶髂螺釘不同進針點置釘對骨盆外鏇不穩定的生物力學影響,為臨床應用提供試驗依據.方法 10具新鮮冰凍成人骨盆標本,骶髂關節拉力螺釘經進針點B(髂後下棘前2.5 cm與坐骨大切跡上4.0 cm的交點)、A(B點同一水平麵前方1.0 cm)、C(B點同一水平麵後方1.0 cm)固定骶髂關節.測量骶髂關節前韌帶完整組、A進針點組、B進針點組、C進針點組在相同外鏇應力下骶髂關節、恥骨聯閤的分離距離,從而比較不同進針點的固定彊度.結果 在對抗外鏇力上,韌帶完整組、C進針點組與A/B組差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05);A、B進針點組之間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).在骶髂關節穩定性上,除韌帶完整組、B進針點組之間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)外,餘各組間差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 對骶髂關節穩定性B進針點更為優越,更為安全、有效.
목적 측량저가라정불동진침점치정대골분외선불은정적생물역학영향,위림상응용제공시험의거.방법 10구신선빙동성인골분표본,저가관절랍력라정경진침점B(가후하극전2.5 cm여좌골대절적상4.0 cm적교점)、A(B점동일수평면전방1.0 cm)、C(B점동일수평면후방1.0 cm)고정저가관절.측량저가관절전인대완정조、A진침점조、B진침점조、C진침점조재상동외선응력하저가관절、치골연합적분리거리,종이비교불동진침점적고정강도.결과 재대항외선력상,인대완정조、C진침점조여A/B조차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05);A、B진침점조지간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).재저가관절은정성상,제인대완정조、B진침점조지간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)외,여각조간차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 대저가관절은정성B진침점경위우월,경위안전、유효.
Objective To observe the biomechanical effect of sacroiliac screw fixation with dif-ferent needling points in treatment of extorsion pelvic instabihty so as to provide experimental basis for clinical application. Methods Ten fresh adult pelvis specimens were fixated by sacroiliac screw with needling points B (2.5 cm anterior to posteroinferior iliac spine and 40. cm posterior to greater sciatic notch), A (0.1 cm anterior to the same horizontal plane of point B) and C ( 1.0 cm posterior to the same horinzontal plane of point B). The shifting of the pubic symphysis diastasis and the sacroiliac joint crack under the same extorsion force was measured in integrity ligament group, point A group, point B group and point C group to compare the stability of different needling points. Results In confronting extor-sion force, integrity ligament group and point C group were obviously inferior to point A group and point B group (P<0.05 ) but there was no statistical difference between point B group and point A group (P > 0.05). As for the stability of the sacroiliac joint, there was statistical difference among all groups ( P < 0.05 ), while there was no statistical difference between integrity ligament group and point B group ( P > 0.05). Conclusion Point B is the most stable, safe and effective needling point.