中华临床医师杂志(电子版)
中華臨床醫師雜誌(電子版)
중화림상의사잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICIANS(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2012年
9期
78-81
,共4页
石庆龙%赵振生%曹双军%王红禄%李晋%李旭彤%任正华
石慶龍%趙振生%曹雙軍%王紅祿%李晉%李旭彤%任正華
석경룡%조진생%조쌍군%왕홍록%리진%리욱동%임정화
结直肠肿瘤%腹腔镜检查%结直肠外科手术
結直腸腫瘤%腹腔鏡檢查%結直腸外科手術
결직장종류%복강경검사%결직장외과수술
Colorectal neoplasms%Laparoscopy%Colorectal surgery
[目的]探讨结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术的可行性和安全性.[方法]回顾我院2006年1月至2011年11月成功施行手术治疗的96例结直肠癌患者的临床资料,其中腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术45例,传统开腹结直肠癌根治手术51例.对比两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、切除肠管长度、淋巴结获取数和术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后留院时间以及局部复发、远处转移等指标.[结果]两组患者术前ASA评分、并发症、病理分级差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).腹腔镜组术中出血量明显少于开腹组[(53.4±19.7) ml vs.(145.0±79.4)ml,P<0.05],手术时间开腹组明显短于腹腔镜组[(174.2±40)minvs.(245.6±87) min,P<0.05];与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组术后肛门排气时间[(2.2±0.5)dvs.(3.4±1.0)d,P<0.05]、进食时间[(4.1±1.1)dvs.(6.1±1.6)d,P<0.05]及术后留院时间[(11.7±2.3)dvs.(18.8±13.9)d,P<0.05]显著缩短;手术切除肠管长度、术中淋巴结获取数以及术后相关并发症两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随访1 ~36个月,平均18个月,两组局部复发和远处转移差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).[结论]腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术具有良好的安全性及可行性,具有出血少、康复快、住院时间短等优势,可在有一定腹腔镜手术基础的医院实行.
[目的]探討結直腸癌腹腔鏡根治術的可行性和安全性.[方法]迴顧我院2006年1月至2011年11月成功施行手術治療的96例結直腸癌患者的臨床資料,其中腹腔鏡結直腸癌根治手術45例,傳統開腹結直腸癌根治手術51例.對比兩組患者的手術時間、術中齣血量、切除腸管長度、淋巴結穫取數和術後胃腸功能恢複時間、術後留院時間以及跼部複髮、遠處轉移等指標.[結果]兩組患者術前ASA評分、併髮癥、病理分級差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).腹腔鏡組術中齣血量明顯少于開腹組[(53.4±19.7) ml vs.(145.0±79.4)ml,P<0.05],手術時間開腹組明顯短于腹腔鏡組[(174.2±40)minvs.(245.6±87) min,P<0.05];與開腹組相比,腹腔鏡組術後肛門排氣時間[(2.2±0.5)dvs.(3.4±1.0)d,P<0.05]、進食時間[(4.1±1.1)dvs.(6.1±1.6)d,P<0.05]及術後留院時間[(11.7±2.3)dvs.(18.8±13.9)d,P<0.05]顯著縮短;手術切除腸管長度、術中淋巴結穫取數以及術後相關併髮癥兩組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).隨訪1 ~36箇月,平均18箇月,兩組跼部複髮和遠處轉移差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).[結論]腹腔鏡結直腸癌根治術具有良好的安全性及可行性,具有齣血少、康複快、住院時間短等優勢,可在有一定腹腔鏡手術基礎的醫院實行.
[목적]탐토결직장암복강경근치술적가행성화안전성.[방법]회고아원2006년1월지2011년11월성공시행수술치료적96례결직장암환자적림상자료,기중복강경결직장암근치수술45례,전통개복결직장암근치수술51례.대비량조환자적수술시간、술중출혈량、절제장관장도、림파결획취수화술후위장공능회복시간、술후류원시간이급국부복발、원처전이등지표.[결과]량조환자술전ASA평분、병발증、병리분급차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).복강경조술중출혈량명현소우개복조[(53.4±19.7) ml vs.(145.0±79.4)ml,P<0.05],수술시간개복조명현단우복강경조[(174.2±40)minvs.(245.6±87) min,P<0.05];여개복조상비,복강경조술후항문배기시간[(2.2±0.5)dvs.(3.4±1.0)d,P<0.05]、진식시간[(4.1±1.1)dvs.(6.1±1.6)d,P<0.05]급술후류원시간[(11.7±2.3)dvs.(18.8±13.9)d,P<0.05]현저축단;수술절제장관장도、술중림파결획취수이급술후상관병발증량조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).수방1 ~36개월,평균18개월,량조국부복발화원처전이차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).[결론]복강경결직장암근치술구유량호적안전성급가행성,구유출혈소、강복쾌、주원시간단등우세,가재유일정복강경수술기출적의원실행.
[Objective]To study the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.[Methods]The clinical data of 45 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery were compared with the data of 51 patients treated by traditional surgery in our department from January 2006 to November 2011.[Results] There were no severe complications and death occurred in both groups.The ASA score,complications and pathologic stage of the two groups had no statistically significant difference( P > 0.05).The intra-operative blood loss of the laparoscopic group was(53.4 ± 19.7) ml.It was obviously less than that in open group [ ( 145.0 ±79.4) ml,P < 0.01].The mean operation time of laparoscopic group and open group were ( 245.6 ± 87.0) min and ( 174.2 ±40.1 ) min respectively,there was a statistical difference between them( P < 0.01 ).The length of the recovery time of gastrointestinal function and hospital stays of laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than open group ( P <0.05 ).There was no statistical difference in the number of cleared lymph nodes and the length of the bowel resection between two groups( P > 0.05 ).During following-up of 1-36 months ( mean 18 months ),there was no significant difference in local recurrence and distant metastasis between two groups.[Conclusions]Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer is safety and feasibility.