中国临床实用医学
中國臨床實用醫學
중국림상실용의학
CHINA CLINICAL PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2008年
8期
31-32
,共2页
疝%腹股沟%外科手术
疝%腹股溝%外科手術
산%복고구%외과수술
Hernia%inguinal%Surgical procedures%Operative
目的 比较腹股沟疝平塞组合补片与疝环充填式无张力修补术的临床疗效.方法 对75例平塞组合补片无张力疝修补术和95例疝环充填式无张力修补术的临床及随访资料进行随机、前瞻性分析比较.结果 在腹股沟区异物感、疼痛和硬块发生率和术后复发率方面,平塞组合补片组合明显低于疝环充填式组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 平塞组合补片式无张力疝修补术与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术相比,具有术后并发症少和复发率低的优点.
目的 比較腹股溝疝平塞組閤補片與疝環充填式無張力脩補術的臨床療效.方法 對75例平塞組閤補片無張力疝脩補術和95例疝環充填式無張力脩補術的臨床及隨訪資料進行隨機、前瞻性分析比較.結果 在腹股溝區異物感、疼痛和硬塊髮生率和術後複髮率方麵,平塞組閤補片組閤明顯低于疝環充填式組,兩組差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 平塞組閤補片式無張力疝脩補術與疝環充填式無張力疝脩補術相比,具有術後併髮癥少和複髮率低的優點.
목적 비교복고구산평새조합보편여산배충전식무장력수보술적림상료효.방법 대75례평새조합보편무장력산수보술화95례산배충전식무장력수보술적림상급수방자료진행수궤、전첨성분석비교.결과 재복고구구이물감、동통화경괴발생솔화술후복발솔방면,평새조합보편조합명현저우산배충전식조,량조차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 평새조합보편식무장력산수보술여산배충전식무장력산수보술상비,구유술후병발증소화복발솔저적우점.
Objective To compare the clinic result of combined mesh patch with mesh plug tension free hemiorrhaphy.Methods A prospective randomized clinic trial was carried out to compare the clinical and follow-up data of the two groups.Results The foreign body sensation,the pain and gelosis in the inguinal region in combined mesh patch group(75cases)were significantly lower than those in mesh plug group(95 cases)(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with mesh plug tension-free hemiorrhaphy,combined mesh patch tension-free herniorrhaphy has less complications and lower recurrence rate.
