南阳师范学院学报
南暘師範學院學報
남양사범학원학보
JOURNAL OF NANYANG TEACHERS COLLEGE
2011年
10期
10-16
,共7页
知识产权国际保护法律适用规则%《ALI原则》%《罗马条例Ⅱ》
知識產權國際保護法律適用規則%《ALI原則》%《囉馬條例Ⅱ》
지식산권국제보호법률괄용규칙%《ALI원칙》%《라마조례Ⅱ》
rules of choice of law on international protection of intellectual property%ALI Principle%Rome Ⅱ
传统知识产权国际保护法律适用规则坚持以地域性原则为主,美国《ALI原则》的法律适用部分突破了地域性原则的束缚,赋予了当事人自由选择法律的权利,确定了知识产权原始权利的单一化与明确化;欧共体《罗马条例Ⅱ》则在知识产权侵权责任的法律适用方面平衡了个人私益与国家利益;这些知识产权国际保护法律适用规则的新发展值得中国借鉴。
傳統知識產權國際保護法律適用規則堅持以地域性原則為主,美國《ALI原則》的法律適用部分突破瞭地域性原則的束縳,賦予瞭噹事人自由選擇法律的權利,確定瞭知識產權原始權利的單一化與明確化;歐共體《囉馬條例Ⅱ》則在知識產權侵權責任的法律適用方麵平衡瞭箇人私益與國傢利益;這些知識產權國際保護法律適用規則的新髮展值得中國藉鑒。
전통지식산권국제보호법률괄용규칙견지이지역성원칙위주,미국《ALI원칙》적법률괄용부분돌파료지역성원칙적속박,부여료당사인자유선택법률적권리,학정료지식산권원시권리적단일화여명학화;구공체《라마조례Ⅱ》칙재지식산권침권책임적법률괄용방면평형료개인사익여국가이익;저사지식산권국제보호법률괄용규칙적신발전치득중국차감。
The traditional rules of choice of law on international protection of intellectual property adhere to the principle of territoriality.The choice of law of the U.S.ALI Principle breaks the shackles of the principle of territoriality,giving concerned parties the rights to choose the applicable law and ascertaining that the initial title is single and clear.Whereas,Rome Ⅱ balances the individual private interest and the national interest regarding the choice of law on infringement of intellectual property rights.China shall learn from the aforementioned new developments on rules of choice of law on international protection of intellectual property.
