山东医科大学学报
山東醫科大學學報
산동의과대학학보
ACTA ACADEMIAE MEDICINAE SHANDONG
2001年
1期
48-50
,共3页
何奇%刘炳伦%秦启亮%谭明刚%唐济生%陈彦方%韩云芳%孙启忠
何奇%劉炳倫%秦啟亮%譚明剛%唐濟生%陳彥方%韓雲芳%孫啟忠
하기%류병륜%진계량%담명강%당제생%진언방%한운방%손계충
电惊厥疗法%优势侧%非优势侧%副反应
電驚厥療法%優勢側%非優勢側%副反應
전량궐요법%우세측%비우세측%부반응
目的:比较脑电图(EEG)、心电图(ECG)监护下优势侧与非优势侧电休克(ECT)治疗精神分裂症的副反应。方法:符合CCMD-Ⅱ诊断标准精神分裂症60例,随机分为优势侧组和非优势侧组各30例,每例每周ECT 3次,共9次。于疗前、第5、第9次ECT以副反应量表(TESs)、韦氏记忆量表(WMs)评分。于第1、5、9次ECT行EEG、ECG监护。结果:非优势侧TESS评分与EEG α波慢化程度突出,两组ECG改变类似,影响记忆环节不同。结论:非优势侧与优势侧ECT副反应稍有不同。
目的:比較腦電圖(EEG)、心電圖(ECG)鑑護下優勢側與非優勢側電休剋(ECT)治療精神分裂癥的副反應。方法:符閤CCMD-Ⅱ診斷標準精神分裂癥60例,隨機分為優勢側組和非優勢側組各30例,每例每週ECT 3次,共9次。于療前、第5、第9次ECT以副反應量錶(TESs)、韋氏記憶量錶(WMs)評分。于第1、5、9次ECT行EEG、ECG鑑護。結果:非優勢側TESS評分與EEG α波慢化程度突齣,兩組ECG改變類似,影響記憶環節不同。結論:非優勢側與優勢側ECT副反應稍有不同。
목적:비교뇌전도(EEG)、심전도(ECG)감호하우세측여비우세측전휴극(ECT)치료정신분렬증적부반응。방법:부합CCMD-Ⅱ진단표준정신분렬증60례,수궤분위우세측조화비우세측조각30례,매례매주ECT 3차,공9차。우료전、제5、제9차ECT이부반응량표(TESs)、위씨기억량표(WMs)평분。우제1、5、9차ECT행EEG、ECG감호。결과:비우세측TESS평분여EEG α파만화정도돌출,량조ECG개변유사,영향기억배절불동。결론:비우세측여우세측ECT부반응초유불동。
Objective:To compare the side effects of nonvers-versus dominance ECT on Schizophrenics with EEG and ECG monitoring. Methods:60 Schizophrenics without severe physical illness met with CCMD- Ⅱwent randomly into the two groups received the non-or dominance ECT accordingly,with 3 times ECT a week,given 9 times ECT totally,and were not exposed to any types of neuroleptics during the whole therapy periods.TESS and WMS were measured before the lst ECT and after the 5th and 9th ECT,and EEG/ECG monitoring were given during the lst、Sth and 9th ECT administered. Results:Side effects on EEG、ECG and WMS in both groups were comparable, and some item, such as headache、 nausea/vomiting or dizziness, of TESS in nondominance ECT group were scaled much highly than the dominance ECT signifficantly. Conclusion :Some side effects in the non-dominance ECT group were much severely than in the dominance ECT group significantly.