中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2008年
6期
947-948
,共2页
疝,腹股沟%麻醉,局部%麻醉,硬膜外%假体和植入物
疝,腹股溝%痳醉,跼部%痳醉,硬膜外%假體和植入物
산,복고구%마취,국부%마취,경막외%가체화식입물
Hernia,inguinal%Aanaesthesia,local%Anaesthesia,epidural%Prostheses and implants
目的 比较不同麻醉方法下无张力疝修补术的临床疗效.方法 腹股沟疝89例随机分为两组,分别采用局部浸润麻醉下手术和硬膜外麻醉下手术,手术方法均为无张力疝修补术.结果 在手术时间、术后早期活动、住院时间、术后疼痛、术后早期并发症及治疗费用等方面,局部浸润麻醉组明显优于硬膜外麻醉组.结论 局部浸润麻醉下无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝安全可靠,可广泛推广.
目的 比較不同痳醉方法下無張力疝脩補術的臨床療效.方法 腹股溝疝89例隨機分為兩組,分彆採用跼部浸潤痳醉下手術和硬膜外痳醉下手術,手術方法均為無張力疝脩補術.結果 在手術時間、術後早期活動、住院時間、術後疼痛、術後早期併髮癥及治療費用等方麵,跼部浸潤痳醉組明顯優于硬膜外痳醉組.結論 跼部浸潤痳醉下無張力疝脩補術治療腹股溝疝安全可靠,可廣汎推廣.
목적 비교불동마취방법하무장력산수보술적림상료효.방법 복고구산89례수궤분위량조,분별채용국부침윤마취하수술화경막외마취하수술,수술방법균위무장력산수보술.결과 재수술시간、술후조기활동、주원시간、술후동통、술후조기병발증급치료비용등방면,국부침윤마취조명현우우경막외마취조.결론 국부침윤마취하무장력산수보술치료복고구산안전가고,가엄범추엄.
Objective To investigate and to compare the clinical curative efficacies of local anaesthesia and epidural block anaesthesia in tension-free hemioplasties. Methods 89 patients hospitalized were randomly divided in-to two groups, with each of them respectively adopting the two types of anaesthesia methods (local anaesthesia and epidural anaesthesia) to cure inguinal hernia,operation methods is tension-free hernioplasties. Results The results show that in terms of duration of operation, early-phase activities after operation, time of hospitalization, post-opera-tion pains,early-phase complication after operation and treatment expenses etc, local anaesthesia is undoubtedly supe-rior to epidural block anaesthesia. Conclusion Tensioa-free hernioplasties under local anaesthesia is worth clinical promotion to benefit all the patients.
