中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2008年
20期
1376-1379
,共4页
石瑞如%张健源%苑雪芹%孙照刚%李传友
石瑞如%張健源%苑雪芹%孫照剛%李傳友
석서여%장건원%원설근%손조강%리전우
分枝杆菌,结核%抗药性,细菌%色谱法,高压液相%微生物敏感性试验
分枝桿菌,結覈%抗藥性,細菌%色譜法,高壓液相%微生物敏感性試驗
분지간균,결핵%항약성,세균%색보법,고압액상%미생물민감성시험
Mycobacteriun tuberculosis%Drug resistance,bacterial%Chromatography,high pressure liquid%Microbial sensitivity test
目的 采用变性高效液相色谱(DHPLC)法和测序法来分析结核分枝杆菌链霉素耐药基因rpsL和rrs基因突变,从而检测是否对链霉素耐药.方法 215株结核分枝杆菌临床分离株(经常规方法证实,115株为链霉素耐药,100株为敏感),测定链霉素最小抑菌浓度(MIC),同时采用DHPLC和测序法检测rpsL和rrs基因突变.结果 85.2%(98/115)的链霉素耐药株携有rpsL和(或)rrs基因突变,其中rpsL基因突变占大多数(76.5%,88/115).对98株带有基因突变的菌株的分析表明,rpsL,rrs基因的突变类型与MIC之间未见密切关系.100株敏感株未检出基因突变.DHPLC法与测序法结果完全一致.结论 本工作建立的DHPLC法可以认为是结核分枝杆菌链霉素耐药分析的一种有效的工具.
目的 採用變性高效液相色譜(DHPLC)法和測序法來分析結覈分枝桿菌鏈黴素耐藥基因rpsL和rrs基因突變,從而檢測是否對鏈黴素耐藥.方法 215株結覈分枝桿菌臨床分離株(經常規方法證實,115株為鏈黴素耐藥,100株為敏感),測定鏈黴素最小抑菌濃度(MIC),同時採用DHPLC和測序法檢測rpsL和rrs基因突變.結果 85.2%(98/115)的鏈黴素耐藥株攜有rpsL和(或)rrs基因突變,其中rpsL基因突變佔大多數(76.5%,88/115).對98株帶有基因突變的菌株的分析錶明,rpsL,rrs基因的突變類型與MIC之間未見密切關繫.100株敏感株未檢齣基因突變.DHPLC法與測序法結果完全一緻.結論 本工作建立的DHPLC法可以認為是結覈分枝桿菌鏈黴素耐藥分析的一種有效的工具.
목적 채용변성고효액상색보(DHPLC)법화측서법래분석결핵분지간균련매소내약기인rpsL화rrs기인돌변,종이검측시부대련매소내약.방법 215주결핵분지간균림상분리주(경상규방법증실,115주위련매소내약,100주위민감),측정련매소최소억균농도(MIC),동시채용DHPLC화측서법검측rpsL화rrs기인돌변.결과 85.2%(98/115)적련매소내약주휴유rpsL화(혹)rrs기인돌변,기중rpsL기인돌변점대다수(76.5%,88/115).대98주대유기인돌변적균주적분석표명,rpsL,rrs기인적돌변류형여MIC지간미견밀절관계.100주민감주미검출기인돌변.DHPLC법여측서법결과완전일치.결론 본공작건립적DHPLC법가이인위시결핵분지간균련매소내약분석적일충유효적공구.
Objective To determine the rpsL and rrs gene mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis)and compare the consistency between the results of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography(DHPLC)and those of DNA sequencing. Methods The values of streptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration(MIC)against 215 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, 115 being streptomycinresistant and 100 being susceptible by a routine proportional method, were tested by DHPLC. DNA sequencing was conducted to detect the rpsL and rrs mutation. Results 98 of the 115 streptomycin-resistant isolates(85. 2%)harbored rpsL and/or rrs mutation, 76. 5%of which being rpsL mutation(88/115). There was no significant correlation between the MIC values and mutation types. No mutation was found in all the susceptible isolates. There was a complete consistency between the DHPLC results and those of DNA sequencing. Conclusion DHPLC can be regarded as a useful and powerful tool to detect the streptomycin resistance detection in M. tuberculosis.