中华检验医学杂志
中華檢驗醫學雜誌
중화검험의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
2012年
5期
431-435
,共5页
陈卫群%卢宏达%孔德勇%刘水逸%汤贝贝%孔庆志%卢忠心
陳衛群%盧宏達%孔德勇%劉水逸%湯貝貝%孔慶誌%盧忠心
진위군%로굉체%공덕용%류수일%탕패패%공경지%로충심
大B细胞,弥漫性,淋巴瘤%微小RNAs%早期诊断%肿瘤标记,生物学
大B細胞,瀰漫性,淋巴瘤%微小RNAs%早期診斷%腫瘤標記,生物學
대B세포,미만성,림파류%미소RNAs%조기진단%종류표기,생물학
Lymphoma,large B cell,diffuse%MicroRNAs%Early detection%Tumor markers,biological
目的 探讨微小RNA-21(miR-21)在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)细胞系和患者血清中的表达及其在DLBCL早期诊断、基因分型及预后判断中的意义.方法 用实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应( FQ-PCR)从细胞水平检测9种DLBCL细胞系(OCI-Ly1、OCI-Ly3、OCI-Ly4、OCI-Ly7、OCI-Ly8、OCI-Ly10、OCI-Ly18、OCI-Ly19和HBL)中miR-21的表达,及临床确诊的62例DLBCL患者(DLBCL组)、50名健康体检者(健康对照组)血清miR-21表达水平;同时,随访62例DLBCL患者无复发生存期(RFS),应用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析62例DLBCL患者血清miR-21表达与预后的关系.结果 健康对照组B淋巴细胞miR-21的相对表达量为1.04±0.02,9种DLBCL细胞系miR-21 相对表达量依次为2.30±0.35、237.97±56.19、5.27±0.83、3.40±0.30、11.22±2.70、133.55±16.78、6.63±0.24、4.91±0.37、81.59±6.64,9种DLBCL细胞系的miR-21表达水平均高于健康对照组(t值分别为7.3、13.7、2 1.0、6.2、8.8、13.6、6.5、39.5、18.1,P均<0.01);且ABC亚型细胞系(OCI-Ly3、OCI-Ly10、HBL)显著高于GCB亚型细胞系(OCI-Ly1、OCI-Ly4、OCI-Ly7、OCI-Ly8、OCI-Ly18、OCI-Ly19;t=11.18,P<0.01).DLBCL组血清中miR-21的表达量为21.38( 10.26 ~45.21),健康对照组为1.87(1.05 ~3.97),DLBCL组血清miR-21的表达显著高于健康对照组(U=168,P=0.000).DLBCL患者中GCB亚型miR-21的表达为18.30(7.32~33.46),ABC亚型miR-21的表达为28.68( 14.92~98.44),ABC亚型miR-21的表达高于GCB亚型(U=336,P=0.043).此外,GCB型Ⅰ+Ⅱ期患者血清miR-21表达为24.75( 16.08 ~50.38),而Ⅲ+Ⅳ期为11.96(4.10~21.05);ABC型Ⅰ+Ⅱ期患者血清miR-21表达为47.49( 25.65~295.41),而Ⅲ+Ⅳ期为16.66(5.35~44.30),Ⅰ+Ⅱ期明显高于Ⅲ+Ⅳ期(GCB型U=62,P=0.013;ABC型U=53,P=0.014).随访DLBCL患者的RFS,miR-21高表达患者预后明显好于miR-21低表达患者(U=259,P=0.035).结论 DLBCL患者血清miR-21高表达,且与DLBCL临床分级分期、基因型和预后判断密切相关,miR-21有可能成为DLBCL早期诊断、基因分型及预后判断的新分子标志.
目的 探討微小RNA-21(miR-21)在瀰漫性大B細胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)細胞繫和患者血清中的錶達及其在DLBCL早期診斷、基因分型及預後判斷中的意義.方法 用實時熒光定量聚閤酶鏈反應( FQ-PCR)從細胞水平檢測9種DLBCL細胞繫(OCI-Ly1、OCI-Ly3、OCI-Ly4、OCI-Ly7、OCI-Ly8、OCI-Ly10、OCI-Ly18、OCI-Ly19和HBL)中miR-21的錶達,及臨床確診的62例DLBCL患者(DLBCL組)、50名健康體檢者(健康對照組)血清miR-21錶達水平;同時,隨訪62例DLBCL患者無複髮生存期(RFS),應用Kaplan-Meier生存麯線分析62例DLBCL患者血清miR-21錶達與預後的關繫.結果 健康對照組B淋巴細胞miR-21的相對錶達量為1.04±0.02,9種DLBCL細胞繫miR-21 相對錶達量依次為2.30±0.35、237.97±56.19、5.27±0.83、3.40±0.30、11.22±2.70、133.55±16.78、6.63±0.24、4.91±0.37、81.59±6.64,9種DLBCL細胞繫的miR-21錶達水平均高于健康對照組(t值分彆為7.3、13.7、2 1.0、6.2、8.8、13.6、6.5、39.5、18.1,P均<0.01);且ABC亞型細胞繫(OCI-Ly3、OCI-Ly10、HBL)顯著高于GCB亞型細胞繫(OCI-Ly1、OCI-Ly4、OCI-Ly7、OCI-Ly8、OCI-Ly18、OCI-Ly19;t=11.18,P<0.01).DLBCL組血清中miR-21的錶達量為21.38( 10.26 ~45.21),健康對照組為1.87(1.05 ~3.97),DLBCL組血清miR-21的錶達顯著高于健康對照組(U=168,P=0.000).DLBCL患者中GCB亞型miR-21的錶達為18.30(7.32~33.46),ABC亞型miR-21的錶達為28.68( 14.92~98.44),ABC亞型miR-21的錶達高于GCB亞型(U=336,P=0.043).此外,GCB型Ⅰ+Ⅱ期患者血清miR-21錶達為24.75( 16.08 ~50.38),而Ⅲ+Ⅳ期為11.96(4.10~21.05);ABC型Ⅰ+Ⅱ期患者血清miR-21錶達為47.49( 25.65~295.41),而Ⅲ+Ⅳ期為16.66(5.35~44.30),Ⅰ+Ⅱ期明顯高于Ⅲ+Ⅳ期(GCB型U=62,P=0.013;ABC型U=53,P=0.014).隨訪DLBCL患者的RFS,miR-21高錶達患者預後明顯好于miR-21低錶達患者(U=259,P=0.035).結論 DLBCL患者血清miR-21高錶達,且與DLBCL臨床分級分期、基因型和預後判斷密切相關,miR-21有可能成為DLBCL早期診斷、基因分型及預後判斷的新分子標誌.
목적 탐토미소RNA-21(miR-21)재미만성대B세포림파류(DLBCL)세포계화환자혈청중적표체급기재DLBCL조기진단、기인분형급예후판단중적의의.방법 용실시형광정량취합매련반응( FQ-PCR)종세포수평검측9충DLBCL세포계(OCI-Ly1、OCI-Ly3、OCI-Ly4、OCI-Ly7、OCI-Ly8、OCI-Ly10、OCI-Ly18、OCI-Ly19화HBL)중miR-21적표체,급림상학진적62례DLBCL환자(DLBCL조)、50명건강체검자(건강대조조)혈청miR-21표체수평;동시,수방62례DLBCL환자무복발생존기(RFS),응용Kaplan-Meier생존곡선분석62례DLBCL환자혈청miR-21표체여예후적관계.결과 건강대조조B림파세포miR-21적상대표체량위1.04±0.02,9충DLBCL세포계miR-21 상대표체량의차위2.30±0.35、237.97±56.19、5.27±0.83、3.40±0.30、11.22±2.70、133.55±16.78、6.63±0.24、4.91±0.37、81.59±6.64,9충DLBCL세포계적miR-21표체수평균고우건강대조조(t치분별위7.3、13.7、2 1.0、6.2、8.8、13.6、6.5、39.5、18.1,P균<0.01);차ABC아형세포계(OCI-Ly3、OCI-Ly10、HBL)현저고우GCB아형세포계(OCI-Ly1、OCI-Ly4、OCI-Ly7、OCI-Ly8、OCI-Ly18、OCI-Ly19;t=11.18,P<0.01).DLBCL조혈청중miR-21적표체량위21.38( 10.26 ~45.21),건강대조조위1.87(1.05 ~3.97),DLBCL조혈청miR-21적표체현저고우건강대조조(U=168,P=0.000).DLBCL환자중GCB아형miR-21적표체위18.30(7.32~33.46),ABC아형miR-21적표체위28.68( 14.92~98.44),ABC아형miR-21적표체고우GCB아형(U=336,P=0.043).차외,GCB형Ⅰ+Ⅱ기환자혈청miR-21표체위24.75( 16.08 ~50.38),이Ⅲ+Ⅳ기위11.96(4.10~21.05);ABC형Ⅰ+Ⅱ기환자혈청miR-21표체위47.49( 25.65~295.41),이Ⅲ+Ⅳ기위16.66(5.35~44.30),Ⅰ+Ⅱ기명현고우Ⅲ+Ⅳ기(GCB형U=62,P=0.013;ABC형U=53,P=0.014).수방DLBCL환자적RFS,miR-21고표체환자예후명현호우miR-21저표체환자(U=259,P=0.035).결론 DLBCL환자혈청miR-21고표체,차여DLBCL림상분급분기、기인형화예후판단밀절상관,miR-21유가능성위DLBCL조기진단、기인분형급예후판단적신분자표지.
Objective To study the expression of microRNA-21 ( miR-21 )in serum of patient with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and DLBCL cell lines and validate the significance of miR-21 in early diagnosis,genotyping and prognosis estimates of DLBCL.Methods miR-21 expression were detected by fluorescent quantity polymerase chain reaction (FQ-PCR)in 9 lymphoma cell lines (OCI-Ly1,OCI-Ly3,OCI-Ly4,OCI-Ly7,OCI-Ly8,OCI-Ly10,OCI-Ly18,OCI-Ly19 and HBL),the serum from DLBCL patients (n =62) and health controls (n =50 ).Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out during the relapsefree survival period of DLBCL patients to explore the relationship between the prognosis and microRNA expression level.Results Real time FQ-PCR result indicated that miR-21 expression was higher in DLBCL cell lines than that in normal B cells (BC).miR-21 expression in normal B cell and 9 DLBCL cell lines separately were 1.04 ± 0.02,2.30 ± 0.35,237.97 ± 56.19,5.27 ± 0.83,3.40 ± 0.30,11.22 ± 2.70,133.55 ± 16.78,6.63 ±0.24,4.91 ±0.37 and 81.59 ±6.64.Compared with BC,the expression of miR-21 were higher in all 9 DLBCL cell lines ( t =7.3,13.7,21.0,6.2,8.8,13.6,6.5,39.5,18.1 ;P < 0.01 ).miR-21 expression segregates with specific molecular subgroups of DLBCL The expression was higher in the ABC type cell lines (OCI-Ly3,OCI-Ly10,HBL) than GCB type cell lines (OCI-Ly1,OCI-Ly4,OCI-Ly7,OCI-Ly8,OCI-Ly18,OCI-Ly19;t =11.18,P < 0.01 ).Consistent with the cell line models,miR-21 expression levels were higher in serum from DLBCL patients [21.38 (10.26-45.21 )] than from controls [1.87 ( 1.05-3.97 ),U =168,P =0.000],and the levels were higher in DLBCL cases with an ABC-type [28.68 ( 14.92-98.44 )] than those in GCB-type [18.30 ( 7.32-33.46 ),U =336,P =0.043].MiR-21 expression levels were different in sera from different clinical stage DLBCL patients.The miR-21 level in serum of patients with subgroup ABC and subgroup GCB in stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ were 47.49( 25.65-295.41 ) and 24.74( 16.08-50.38) respectively and in stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 16.66 ( 5.35-44.30 ) and 11.96 ( 4.10-21.05) respectively.The levels were higher in DLBCL cases with Ⅰ -Ⅱ stage than those with Ⅲ-Ⅳ stage (U =62,P =0.013 in GCB type; U =53,P =0.014 in ABC type).Moreover,compare with relapse-free survival in DLBCL patients,high miR-21 expression was associated with well prognosis ( U =259,P =0.035).Conclusions MiR-21 is high expression in DLBCL cell lines and DLBCL patients serum.miR-21 level in sera from DLBCL patients is associated with clinical stage,molecular subgroup and prognosis estimates.MiR-21 may serve as a new biomarker to early detection,genotyping and prognosis estimates of DLBCL.