CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较两种情境下不同情绪稳定性个体心率变异性与心率,探讨情境、情绪稳定性与心率变异性的关系.方法 96名健康男性飞行学员,在60 h飞行训练后由飞行教员用飞行学员情绪稳定性评价量表进行评定,分为高情绪稳定性组与低情绪稳定性组.在Sternberg双重作业任务与标准起落飞行两种情境中,记录心率变异性指标和心率,并进行比较.结果 Sternberg双重作业任务情境中,高情绪稳定性个体具有较小的Lfnorm和Hfnorm(P<0.05),较小的LF/HF和心率(P<0.05).但处于飞行情境中,高情绪稳定性个体则有较大的Lfnorm和Hfnorm,较小的LF/HF和心率(P<0.05).结论与情绪稳定性相关的自主神经系统活动的波动性出现情境分离.提示个体适应外部环境的能力差异不仅体现在个性、气质和认知模式上,也存在生理基础的差异.
목적비교량충정경하불동정서은정성개체심솔변이성여심솔,탐토정경、정서은정성여심솔변이성적관계.방법 96명건강남성비행학원,재60 h비행훈련후유비행교원용비행학원정서은정성평개량표진행평정,분위고정서은정성조여저정서은정성조.재Sternberg쌍중작업임무여표준기락비행량충정경중,기록심솔변이성지표화심솔,병진행비교.결과 Sternberg쌍중작업임무정경중,고정서은정성개체구유교소적Lfnorm화Hfnorm(P<0.05),교소적LF/HF화심솔(P<0.05).단처우비행정경중,고정서은정성개체칙유교대적Lfnorm화Hfnorm,교소적LF/HF화심솔(P<0.05).결론여정서은정성상관적자주신경계통활동적파동성출현정경분리.제시개체괄응외부배경적능력차이불부체현재개성、기질화인지모식상,야존재생리기출적차이.
Objective To compare heart rate variability(HRV) and heart rate(HR) between individuals with different emotional stabilities in two situations and to discuss the relationship between situation, emotional stability and HRV. Method Ninety-six healthy male flying students were assessed after 60 h flying exercises by senior pilots using Criterion Assessment Scale of Emotional Stability of Flying Cadets(CASESFC) compiled by our department. They were divided into groups of high emotional stability and low emotional stability. ECG were recorded in situations of Sternberg Dual Task and Flying and HRV components and HR were analyzed and compared. Result When subjects were exposed to Sternberg dual task situation, individuals with high emotional stability had lower LFnorm(P<0.05), HFnorm(P<0.05), LF/HF ratio and HR(P<0.05) than those with low emotional stability. When it comes to flying situation, individuals with high emotional stability had higher LFnorm and HFnorm, but LF/HF ratio and HR(P<0.05) were still lower than those with low emotional stability. Conclusion We found that there is a tendency which implies the situational separation of fluctuation of autonomic nervous system related to emotional stability. It suggests that the ability of an individual to adjust to outer environment depends not only on personality, temperament and cognitive module, but also on a physiological basis.