CAJ | 학술논문

目的:比较拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙时,传统的凿骨劈冠法与改良涡轮机拔除法的优劣.方法: 600 例下颌阻生第三磨牙病例,其中300 例,使用传统的凿骨劈冠法拔除, 另300 例使用改良涡轮机法拔除,对手术时间以及术中、术后并发症进行对比观察和统计分析.结果: 2 种方法的手术时间分别为(22.285±12.025) min和(16.115±12.078) min.与传统的凿骨劈冠法相比,改良涡轮机拔除法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的手术时间较短(P<0.05),术中及术后并发症的发生率均明显降低(P<0.05).结论: 改良器械的应用,使阻生下颌第三磨牙的拔除更加方便,值得推广应用.
목적:비교발제하합조생제삼마아시,전통적착골벽관법여개량와륜궤발제법적우렬.방법: 600 례하합조생제삼마아병례,기중300 례,사용전통적착골벽관법발제, 령300 례사용개량와륜궤법발제,대수술시간이급술중、술후병발증진행대비관찰화통계분석.결과: 2 충방법적수술시간분별위(22.285±12.025) min화(16.115±12.078) min.여전통적착골벽관법상비,개량와륜궤발제법발제하합조생제삼마아적수술시간교단(P<0.05),술중급술후병발증적발생솔균명현강저(P<0.05).결론: 개량기계적응용,사조생하합제삼마아적발제경가방편,치득추엄응용.
Objective:To study the feasibility of extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth using turbine drill and new instruments. Methods: 600 patients with impacted mandibular third molars were divides into 2 groups. A group used turbine drill and new instruments to extract the impacted mandibular third molar. B group used the dental chisel to extract the impacted mandibular third molar. The operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded to assess the effects of the methods. Results: The operation time of group A and group B was (22.285±12.025 01) min and (16.115±12.078 62) min respectively. The operation time of group A was shorter(P<0.05). The intraoperative and postoperative complication incidence rate was lower(P<0.05). Conclusion: Turbine drill and new instruments method is superior to dental chisel method in the extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.