中国水稻科学
中國水稻科學
중국수도과학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF RICE SCIENCE
2009年
5期
551-554
,共4页
程本义%吴伟%夏俊辉%刘鑫%杨仕华
程本義%吳偉%夏俊輝%劉鑫%楊仕華
정본의%오위%하준휘%류흠%양사화
常规水稻%杂交水稻%微卫星标记%遗传多样性
常規水稻%雜交水稻%微衛星標記%遺傳多樣性
상규수도%잡교수도%미위성표기%유전다양성
conventional rice%hybrid rice%microsatellite marker%genetic diversity
利用12个DNA微卫星标记分析了浙江省近年来主要的44个常规水稻品种和54个杂交水稻组合,共检测到等位基因68个,每个标记2~10个;带型数共127种,每个标记3~18种;平均多态性频率0.752,变幅为0.567~0.905.常规品种和杂交组合均表现为亚种间遗传差异明显、亚种内遗传差异较小,籼型遗传多样性高于粳型.平均遗传相似系数,常规品种籼型为0.672,粳型为0.711,籼粳间为0.103,杂交组合籼型为0.636,粳型为0.669,籼粳间为0.343.聚类分析显示,以遗传相似系数0.618为阈值将常规品种分成6类,以0.601为阈值将杂交组合分成7类,且多数同类型品种或组合聚为同一类.
利用12箇DNA微衛星標記分析瞭浙江省近年來主要的44箇常規水稻品種和54箇雜交水稻組閤,共檢測到等位基因68箇,每箇標記2~10箇;帶型數共127種,每箇標記3~18種;平均多態性頻率0.752,變幅為0.567~0.905.常規品種和雜交組閤均錶現為亞種間遺傳差異明顯、亞種內遺傳差異較小,秈型遺傳多樣性高于粳型.平均遺傳相似繫數,常規品種秈型為0.672,粳型為0.711,秈粳間為0.103,雜交組閤秈型為0.636,粳型為0.669,秈粳間為0.343.聚類分析顯示,以遺傳相似繫數0.618為閾值將常規品種分成6類,以0.601為閾值將雜交組閤分成7類,且多數同類型品種或組閤聚為同一類.
이용12개DNA미위성표기분석료절강성근년래주요적44개상규수도품충화54개잡교수도조합,공검측도등위기인68개,매개표기2~10개;대형수공127충,매개표기3~18충;평균다태성빈솔0.752,변폭위0.567~0.905.상규품충화잡교조합균표현위아충간유전차이명현、아충내유전차이교소,선형유전다양성고우갱형.평균유전상사계수,상규품충선형위0.672,갱형위0.711,선갱간위0.103,잡교조합선형위0.636,갱형위0.669,선갱간위0.343.취류분석현시,이유전상사계수0.618위역치장상규품충분성6류,이0.601위역치장잡교조합분성7류,차다수동류형품충혹조합취위동일류.
Forty-four conventional rice varieties and 54 hybrid rice combinations in Zhejiang Province, China were assayed with a set of 12 microsatellite markers. A total of 68 alleles and 127 fingerprints from all tested materials were detected. The values of the frequency of polymorphism ranged from 0.567 to 0.905 with an average of 0.752. The conventional rice varieties and hybrid rice combinations both had obviously genetic difference among subspecies, but had less genetic difference within subspecies. The genetic diversity of indica type was higher than that of japonica type. The average genetic similarity coefficients within conventional indica, japonica and between indica and japonica rice varieties were 0.672, 0.711 and 0.103, respectively. The average genetic similarity coefficient within indica, japonica, and between indica and japonica hybrid rice combinations were 0.636, 0.669 and 0.343, respectively. Cluster analysis results showed that the conventional rice varieties and hybrid rice combinations were classified into 6 and 7 groups, respectively. Most of varieties or combinations with same type gathered into same group.