CAJ | 학술논문

该文从认知语言学和法律语言学角度，基于语料，分析了法庭语言中概念隐喻的特点。研究的结果显示，与其他语言变体相比，法庭语言中的隐喻表达具有如下特点：多以明喻的形式出现，始源域和目标域往往具有上下义的关系，始源域的选择受到目标域的限制，大多以口语形式出现．出庭人员谨慎地使用隐喻表达，较多出现于法庭演说和法庭辩论阶段，较少出现于提问和交叉询问阶段。
해문종인지어언학화법률어언학각도，기우어료，분석료법정어언중개념은유적특점。연구적결과현시，여기타어언변체상비，법정어언중적은유표체구유여하특점：다이명유적형식출현，시원역화목표역왕왕구유상하의적관계，시원역적선택수도목표역적한제，대다이구어형식출현．출정인원근신지사용은유표체，교다출현우법정연설화법정변론계단，교소출현우제문화교차순문계단。
Based on the corpus, this paper, from the angles of Cognitive Linguistics and Forensic Linguistics, analyzes the features of the conceptual metaphors in court language. The result indicates that compared with other linguistic variants, metaphors in court language undertakes the following features ： 1 ） more similes, 2） the source do- main and the target domain often are hyponymie, and the choice of the source domain is restricted by the target domain, 3） most of them are colloquial, 4） court attendants tentatively use metaphorical expressions, 5） there are more metaphorical expressions in forensic speeeh and court debate and less in interrogation and cross -examination.