国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
2011年
4期
577-580
,共4页
赵宁%万超%邸平会%孙瑞雪%王建仓%Tristan Bice%徐俊杰
趙寧%萬超%邸平會%孫瑞雪%王建倉%Tristan Bice%徐俊傑
조저%만초%저평회%손서설%왕건창%Tristan Bice%서준걸
激光光凝%滋阴凉血散瘀汤%糖尿病性视网膜病变
激光光凝%滋陰涼血散瘀湯%糖尿病性視網膜病變
격광광응%자음량혈산어탕%당뇨병성시망막병변
photocoagulation%traditional Chinese medicine%diabetic retinopathy
目的:探讨口服滋阴凉血散瘀汤联合激光治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变的临床疗效.方法:采用口服滋阴凉血散瘀汤联合视网膜光凝治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变患者,以单纯视网膜光凝为对照组,对比两组患者在治疗后1,6,12mo的视力、视野及新生血管的变化情况.结果:口服滋阴凉血散瘀汤联合光凝治疗组患者12mo时视力提高(62.3% vs 43.1%, P=0.037),视野改变(17.0±3.7 vs 14.9±3.7, P=0.002)及新生血管退缩情况(67.2% vs 48.3%, P=0.036)均优于对照组患者.结论:滋阴凉血散瘀汤联合激光治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变较单纯激光治疗更有效.
目的:探討口服滋陰涼血散瘀湯聯閤激光治療糖尿病性視網膜病變的臨床療效.方法:採用口服滋陰涼血散瘀湯聯閤視網膜光凝治療糖尿病性視網膜病變患者,以單純視網膜光凝為對照組,對比兩組患者在治療後1,6,12mo的視力、視野及新生血管的變化情況.結果:口服滋陰涼血散瘀湯聯閤光凝治療組患者12mo時視力提高(62.3% vs 43.1%, P=0.037),視野改變(17.0±3.7 vs 14.9±3.7, P=0.002)及新生血管退縮情況(67.2% vs 48.3%, P=0.036)均優于對照組患者.結論:滋陰涼血散瘀湯聯閤激光治療糖尿病性視網膜病變較單純激光治療更有效.
목적:탐토구복자음량혈산어탕연합격광치료당뇨병성시망막병변적림상료효.방법:채용구복자음량혈산어탕연합시망막광응치료당뇨병성시망막병변환자,이단순시망막광응위대조조,대비량조환자재치료후1,6,12mo적시력、시야급신생혈관적변화정황.결과:구복자음량혈산어탕연합광응치료조환자12mo시시력제고(62.3% vs 43.1%, P=0.037),시야개변(17.0±3.7 vs 14.9±3.7, P=0.002)급신생혈관퇴축정황(67.2% vs 48.3%, P=0.036)균우우대조조환자.결론:자음량혈산어탕연합격광치료당뇨병성시망막병변교단순격광치료경유효.
AIM:To explore the potentially beneficial clinical effects of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) combined with photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy(DR).METHODS:Chinese patients with DR were divided into two groups. A joint treatment group received both the TCM ziyinliangxuesanyutang and photocoagulation, while a control group received only photocoagulation laser treatment. Visual acuity tests, visual field retinal sensitivity tests, and fundus fluorescein angiography (to measure neovascular regression) were performed. Vision was compared between the two groups 1 month, 6, and 12 months after treatment.RESULTS:Twelve months after treatment, the recovery of visual acuity (62.3% vs 43.1%, P=0.037) and retinal sensitivity \[17.0±3.7 decibels (dB) vs 14.9±3.7dB, P=0.002\] as well as neovascular regression (67.2% vs 48.3%, P=0.036) in the joint treatment group were all significantly greater than that of the control group.CONCLUSION:Compared with laser treatment alone, the joint application of TCM and photocoagulation is shown to be more effective than DR treatment method.