罕少疾病杂志
罕少疾病雜誌
한소질병잡지
JOURNAL OF RARE AND UNCOMMON DISEASES
2014年
3期
38-42
,共5页
杨将%李环%胡艳%肖爱民%马喆
楊將%李環%鬍豔%肖愛民%馬喆
양장%리배%호염%초애민%마철
子宫托%盆腔器官脱垂(POP)
子宮託%盆腔器官脫垂(POP)
자궁탁%분강기관탈수(POP)
Pessary%Pelvic Organ Prolepse (POP)
目的:评估子宫托治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的临床效果及对患者生活质量影响。方法对2012年2月至2014年1月就诊于北京大学深圳医院妇科门诊并使用子宫托的POP患者进行电话随访,填写患者盆底症状影响量表PFDI-20、生活影响量表(PFIQ-7)的部分内容,采集患者子宫托使用情况。采用配对秩和检验对患者子宫托治疗前后进行检验及效果评估。结果共有46例患者采用子宫托治疗,其中,32例完成随访,占69.56%,治疗前症状影响量表总体评分为19(3-30),治疗后总体评分为5(0-30),P值<0.05;生活质量影响量表治疗前总体评分为12(0-33),治疗后评分为0.50(0-32),P<0.05,治疗成功率为84%。结论子宫托可以明显改善患者的临床症状,并明显提高患者的生活质量。
目的:評估子宮託治療盆腔器官脫垂(POP)的臨床效果及對患者生活質量影響。方法對2012年2月至2014年1月就診于北京大學深圳醫院婦科門診併使用子宮託的POP患者進行電話隨訪,填寫患者盆底癥狀影響量錶PFDI-20、生活影響量錶(PFIQ-7)的部分內容,採集患者子宮託使用情況。採用配對秩和檢驗對患者子宮託治療前後進行檢驗及效果評估。結果共有46例患者採用子宮託治療,其中,32例完成隨訪,佔69.56%,治療前癥狀影響量錶總體評分為19(3-30),治療後總體評分為5(0-30),P值<0.05;生活質量影響量錶治療前總體評分為12(0-33),治療後評分為0.50(0-32),P<0.05,治療成功率為84%。結論子宮託可以明顯改善患者的臨床癥狀,併明顯提高患者的生活質量。
목적:평고자궁탁치료분강기관탈수(POP)적림상효과급대환자생활질량영향。방법대2012년2월지2014년1월취진우북경대학심수의원부과문진병사용자궁탁적POP환자진행전화수방,전사환자분저증상영향량표PFDI-20、생활영향량표(PFIQ-7)적부분내용,채집환자자궁탁사용정황。채용배대질화검험대환자자궁탁치료전후진행검험급효과평고。결과공유46례환자채용자궁탁치료,기중,32례완성수방,점69.56%,치료전증상영향량표총체평분위19(3-30),치료후총체평분위5(0-30),P치<0.05;생활질량영향량표치료전총체평분위12(0-33),치료후평분위0.50(0-32),P<0.05,치료성공솔위84%。결론자궁탁가이명현개선환자적림상증상,병명현제고환자적생활질량。
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of pessary in relieving the symptoms and improving the life quality of the women with pelvic organ prolepses (POP). Methods The patients, who were instructed to use pessaries for treating POP, were followed up by phone and finished part of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7(PFIQ-7) after 3 and 6 months’treatment. Wilcoxon’s rank sum test was used to evaluate the clinical effect. Results The pessaries were fitted in 46 patients from February, 2012 to January, 2014. 14 women were lost to follow-up. The remaining 32 patients (69.56%, median age 71 years) completed the study. Five women (15.6 2%) chose not to continue with the pessary treatment. In those who continued treatment, the general score of decreased from a median NRS of 19 (3-30) to 5 (0-30, p<0.05) from a median NRS of 12 (0-33) to 0.50 (0-32, p<0.05) after pessary treatment for 3 or 6 months. No woman complained to have relevant complications after pessary treatment. Conclusions Treatment with pessaries might be a feasible treatment option to relieve the symptoms and improve the life quality for women who suffered from POP.