中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2012年
17期
2598-2599
,共2页
张淇钏%方喜斌%李智业%陈伟宏%倪晓彬%陈素芝%罗杨%陈纪平
張淇釧%方喜斌%李智業%陳偉宏%倪曉彬%陳素芝%囉楊%陳紀平
장기천%방희빈%리지업%진위굉%예효빈%진소지%라양%진기평
血液透析滤过%多器官功能衰竭
血液透析濾過%多器官功能衰竭
혈액투석려과%다기관공능쇠갈
Hemodiafiltration%Multiple organ failure
目的 探讨高容量与常规容量连续性血液净化(CBP)治疗多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)的疗效.方法 选择MODS患者38例,随机分为高容量CBP组(治疗组)18例、常规容量CBP组(对照组)20例,观察并比较两组治疗后24、48 h平均动脉压(MAP)、多巴胺剂量、PaO2/FiO2、APACHEⅡ评分、血乳酸、ICU住院时间、ICU病死率.结果 治疗后24、48 h,治疗组MAP、PaO2/FiO2升高,多巴胺剂量、APACHEⅡ评分、血乳酸减少,与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);与对照组比较,治疗组ICU住院时间缩短[ (8.54±4.15)d与(11.82±5.76)d]、ICU病死率明显降低(22.5%与35.0%)(均P<0.05).结论 高容量连续性血液净化较常规容量连续性血液净化治疗MODS可降低病死率.
目的 探討高容量與常規容量連續性血液淨化(CBP)治療多器官功能障礙綜閤徵(MODS)的療效.方法 選擇MODS患者38例,隨機分為高容量CBP組(治療組)18例、常規容量CBP組(對照組)20例,觀察併比較兩組治療後24、48 h平均動脈壓(MAP)、多巴胺劑量、PaO2/FiO2、APACHEⅡ評分、血乳痠、ICU住院時間、ICU病死率.結果 治療後24、48 h,治療組MAP、PaO2/FiO2升高,多巴胺劑量、APACHEⅡ評分、血乳痠減少,與對照組比較差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05);與對照組比較,治療組ICU住院時間縮短[ (8.54±4.15)d與(11.82±5.76)d]、ICU病死率明顯降低(22.5%與35.0%)(均P<0.05).結論 高容量連續性血液淨化較常規容量連續性血液淨化治療MODS可降低病死率.
목적 탐토고용량여상규용량련속성혈액정화(CBP)치료다기관공능장애종합정(MODS)적료효.방법 선택MODS환자38례,수궤분위고용량CBP조(치료조)18례、상규용량CBP조(대조조)20례,관찰병비교량조치료후24、48 h평균동맥압(MAP)、다파알제량、PaO2/FiO2、APACHEⅡ평분、혈유산、ICU주원시간、ICU병사솔.결과 치료후24、48 h,치료조MAP、PaO2/FiO2승고,다파알제량、APACHEⅡ평분、혈유산감소,여대조조비교차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05);여대조조비교,치료조ICU주원시간축단[ (8.54±4.15)d여(11.82±5.76)d]、ICU병사솔명현강저(22.5%여35.0%)(균P<0.05).결론 고용량련속성혈액정화교상규용량련속성혈액정화치료MODS가강저병사솔.
Objective To compare the effect of high volume continuous blood purification (CBP) with routine CBP on multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS).Methods 38 patients with MODS were randomly divided into high volume CBP group( treatment group,18 cases) and routine CBP group (control group,20 cases).And they were respectively detected on mean arterial pressure(MAP),dosage of Dopamine,PaO2/FiO2,APACHE [ score,lactic acid,length of stay and mortality in ICU post-treatment 24h and 48h.Results Compared with control group,MAP and PaO2/FiO2 on treatment group were more higher( P < 0.05 ),while dosage of Dopamine,APACHE Ⅱ score,lactic acid were significantly shorter than these of treatment group( P < 0.05 ),and length of stay and mortality in ICU were significantly lower than those of treatmen group [ ( 8.54 ± 4.15 ) d vs ( 11.82 ± 5.76) d,P < 0.05:22.2% vs 35.0%,P <0.05 ].Conclusion High volume CBP could reduce the mortality in ICU compared with control group routine CBP.