中华全科医师杂志
中華全科醫師雜誌
중화전과의사잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
2008年
10期
703-704
,共2页
生活质量%医师
生活質量%醫師
생활질량%의사
Quality of life%Physicians
为了了解北京地区三级甲等医院急诊医师与门诊医师的生存质量,在北京5家三级甲等医院中随机选取门、急诊医师160人,使用36条目简明量表(SF-36)进行测试,并与常规标准比较.结果 显示门诊医师在精神健康项目得分较标准得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).急诊医师在一般健康状况项目得分较标准得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在精力、社会功能和精神健康项目得分较标准得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).急诊医师在一般健康状况、精力、社会功能和精神健康项目得分较门诊医师得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).可见门诊医师的生存质量明显好于急诊医师.急诊医师未处于健康状态.
為瞭瞭解北京地區三級甲等醫院急診醫師與門診醫師的生存質量,在北京5傢三級甲等醫院中隨機選取門、急診醫師160人,使用36條目簡明量錶(SF-36)進行測試,併與常規標準比較.結果 顯示門診醫師在精神健康項目得分較標準得分差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).急診醫師在一般健康狀況項目得分較標準得分差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),在精力、社會功能和精神健康項目得分較標準得分差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).急診醫師在一般健康狀況、精力、社會功能和精神健康項目得分較門診醫師得分差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).可見門診醫師的生存質量明顯好于急診醫師.急診醫師未處于健康狀態.
위료료해북경지구삼급갑등의원급진의사여문진의사적생존질량,재북경5가삼급갑등의원중수궤선취문、급진의사160인,사용36조목간명량표(SF-36)진행측시,병여상규표준비교.결과 현시문진의사재정신건강항목득분교표준득분차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).급진의사재일반건강상황항목득분교표준득분차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),재정력、사회공능화정신건강항목득분교표준득분차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).급진의사재일반건강상황、정력、사회공능화정신건강항목득분교문진의사득분차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).가견문진의사적생존질량명현호우급진의사.급진의사미처우건강상태.
This survey was to assess physicians' quality of life within tertiary hospitals in Beijing.SF-36 was used to analyze and compare 160 physicians with normal models. There was significant difference in mental health score between out-patient physicians and general populations (P<0.01). However, there was significant difference in general health (P<0.05), vitality (P<0.01), social function (P<0.01),and mental health (P<0.01) scores between emergency physicians and general populations. There was significant difference in general health (P<0. 05), vitality (P<0.01), social function (P<0. 01), and mental health (P<0.01) scores between emergency physicians and out-patient doctors. Out-patient doctors' quality of life is better than emergency physicians. Emergency physicians might live in sub-health status.