中华航空航天医学杂志
中華航空航天醫學雜誌
중화항공항천의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE MEDICINE
2010年
4期
270-273
,共4页
张雁歌%孙雪蕾%张霞%谢溯江%张清俊%刘晖
張雁歌%孫雪蕾%張霞%謝溯江%張清俊%劉暉
장안가%손설뢰%장하%사소강%장청준%류휘
人员选用%体格检查%听力检查%参考标准
人員選用%體格檢查%聽力檢查%參攷標準
인원선용%체격검사%은력검사%삼고표준
Personnel selection%Physical examination%Hearing tests%Reference standards
目的 通过分析招收飞行学员的纯音听阈及文献复习,提出新的招收飞行学员听力检查标准.方法 对2666名青年学生按空军统一听力检查方法进行纯音测听检查,测听频率为250~8000 Hz,分析其80%、90%、95%、99%百分位值.查阅外军飞行员选拔听力检查标准,与我军听力检查标准进行对比.结果 在第1次检查的2584耳中,80%的学生高频听力在正常范围.6000 Hz听力损失的程度和比率较高,90%分位值为30 dB,95%分位值为35 dB,99%分位值为55 dB;其次是4000 Hz和8000 Hz,95%分位值为25 dB,99%分位值为40 dB.在第2次检查的2748耳中,也有80%的学生高频听力在正常范围.6000 Hz和8000 Hz处听力损失的程度和比率较高,95%分位值为30 dB,99%分位值是45 dB;其次是4000 Hz,99%分位值是40 dB.结论 建议我军招收飞行学员听力检查标准,500~2000 Hz小于25 dB,3000 Hz、4000 Hz和6000 Hz平均听阈不超过40 dB;将低频250 Hz和高频8000 Hz两个频率去除.
目的 通過分析招收飛行學員的純音聽閾及文獻複習,提齣新的招收飛行學員聽力檢查標準.方法 對2666名青年學生按空軍統一聽力檢查方法進行純音測聽檢查,測聽頻率為250~8000 Hz,分析其80%、90%、95%、99%百分位值.查閱外軍飛行員選拔聽力檢查標準,與我軍聽力檢查標準進行對比.結果 在第1次檢查的2584耳中,80%的學生高頻聽力在正常範圍.6000 Hz聽力損失的程度和比率較高,90%分位值為30 dB,95%分位值為35 dB,99%分位值為55 dB;其次是4000 Hz和8000 Hz,95%分位值為25 dB,99%分位值為40 dB.在第2次檢查的2748耳中,也有80%的學生高頻聽力在正常範圍.6000 Hz和8000 Hz處聽力損失的程度和比率較高,95%分位值為30 dB,99%分位值是45 dB;其次是4000 Hz,99%分位值是40 dB.結論 建議我軍招收飛行學員聽力檢查標準,500~2000 Hz小于25 dB,3000 Hz、4000 Hz和6000 Hz平均聽閾不超過40 dB;將低頻250 Hz和高頻8000 Hz兩箇頻率去除.
목적 통과분석초수비행학원적순음은역급문헌복습,제출신적초수비행학원은력검사표준.방법 대2666명청년학생안공군통일은력검사방법진행순음측은검사,측은빈솔위250~8000 Hz,분석기80%、90%、95%、99%백분위치.사열외군비행원선발은력검사표준,여아군은력검사표준진행대비.결과 재제1차검사적2584이중,80%적학생고빈은력재정상범위.6000 Hz은력손실적정도화비솔교고,90%분위치위30 dB,95%분위치위35 dB,99%분위치위55 dB;기차시4000 Hz화8000 Hz,95%분위치위25 dB,99%분위치위40 dB.재제2차검사적2748이중,야유80%적학생고빈은력재정상범위.6000 Hz화8000 Hz처은력손실적정도화비솔교고,95%분위치위30 dB,99%분위치시45 dB;기차시4000 Hz,99%분위치시40 dB.결론 건의아군초수비행학원은력검사표준,500~2000 Hz소우25 dB,3000 Hz、4000 Hz화6000 Hz평균은역불초과40 dB;장저빈250 Hz화고빈8000 Hz량개빈솔거제.
Objective To raise new hearing examination standard for the selection of flying cadets by analyzing the pure tone threshold of audibility and reviewing related literatures.Methods Two thousand six hundred and sixty-six flying cadet candidates were tested by Audiomer.Testing frequencies were from 250 to 8000 Hz.Percentiles of 80%, 90%, 95% and 99% were analyzed.In literature review foreign military hearing examination standards were compared with China's.Results Hearing threshold of 80% candidates was normal in the first test of 2584 ears.Obvious audibility loss and high ratio were found at 6000 Hz and were respectively 30 dB, 35 dB and 55 dB corresponding to the percentiles of 90%, 95% and 99%.2748 ears were examined in second test and 80% of them showed normal value in high frequency range.6000 Hz and 8000 Hz were the frequencies where obvious audibility loss and high ratio of amblyacusia appeared, that was 30 dB loss for 95%percentile and 35 dB for 99 % respectively.Then 40 dB loss for 99 % percentile was got at 4000 Hz.Conclusions It is suggested that hearing standard for the selection of flying cadet should be revised and the tests at 250 Hz and 8000 Hz could be cancelled.New hearing exam standard could be suggested as less than 25 dB loss for 500-2000 Hz tests and the average hearing threshold couldn't exceed 40 dB corresponding to the tests at 3000 Hz, 4000 Hz and 6000 Hz.