国际肿瘤学杂志
國際腫瘤學雜誌
국제종류학잡지
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ONCOLOGY
2012年
5期
395-400
,共6页
邹喜%张纬建%洪金省%刘锋%蔡传书%王培荣%陈德钦
鄒喜%張緯建%洪金省%劉鋒%蔡傳書%王培榮%陳德欽
추희%장위건%홍금성%류봉%채전서%왕배영%진덕흠
结直肠肿瘤%细胞周期蛋白D1%G870A多态性%Meta分析
結直腸腫瘤%細胞週期蛋白D1%G870A多態性%Meta分析
결직장종류%세포주기단백D1%G870A다태성%Meta분석
Colorectal neoplasms%Cyclin D1%G870A polymorphism%Meta anaiysis
目的 综合评价细胞周期蛋白D1( Cyclin D1)基因G870A多态性与结直肠癌易感性的关系.方法 通过CNKI、PubMed、EMCC等数据库检索文献,获得有关Cyclin D1基因G870A多态性与结直肠癌危险性关系的研究结果,并通过Meta分析进行系统评价.所有文献均采用病例对照研究或者巢式病例对照研究,以OR值为效应指标,基因型在对照群体中的分布均符合Hardy-Weinberg遗传平衡定律,对文献进行评价筛选、异质性检验.本次Meta分析共纳入23项研究,累计病例6344例,对照9018例,利用RevMan5.0对各研究原始结果进行统计处理,对突变纯合子AA和杂合子GA基因型与纯合基因型GG进行比较,并计算合并OR值及其95%可信区间(CI).结果 AA和GA与GG基因型在病例组与健康对照组之间差异有统计学意义,OR=1.10(95%CI:1.01~ 1.19,P=0.02);按不同人群进行分层分析,亚洲人群OR=1.11(95%CI:0.98 ~1.26,P=0.11),美洲人群OR=1.13(95%CI:0.97~1.32,P=0.12),欧洲人群OR=1.06(95% CI:0.89~1.25,P=0.52),大洋洲人群OR=1.05(95%CI:0.80~ 1.38,P=0.73);按不同对照进行分组分析,医院基础OR=1.07(95% CI:0.95~1.20,P=0.28),人群基础OR=1.13(95%CI:1.01 ~1.26,P=0.04).结论 Cyclin D1基因G870A多态性与结直肠癌易感性总体分析在统计学上具有相关性,按不同人群进行分组分析,都不支持具有相关性;按不同对照进行分组分析,以医院基础不具有相关性,以人群为基础具有相关性.
目的 綜閤評價細胞週期蛋白D1( Cyclin D1)基因G870A多態性與結直腸癌易感性的關繫.方法 通過CNKI、PubMed、EMCC等數據庫檢索文獻,穫得有關Cyclin D1基因G870A多態性與結直腸癌危險性關繫的研究結果,併通過Meta分析進行繫統評價.所有文獻均採用病例對照研究或者巢式病例對照研究,以OR值為效應指標,基因型在對照群體中的分佈均符閤Hardy-Weinberg遺傳平衡定律,對文獻進行評價篩選、異質性檢驗.本次Meta分析共納入23項研究,纍計病例6344例,對照9018例,利用RevMan5.0對各研究原始結果進行統計處理,對突變純閤子AA和雜閤子GA基因型與純閤基因型GG進行比較,併計算閤併OR值及其95%可信區間(CI).結果 AA和GA與GG基因型在病例組與健康對照組之間差異有統計學意義,OR=1.10(95%CI:1.01~ 1.19,P=0.02);按不同人群進行分層分析,亞洲人群OR=1.11(95%CI:0.98 ~1.26,P=0.11),美洲人群OR=1.13(95%CI:0.97~1.32,P=0.12),歐洲人群OR=1.06(95% CI:0.89~1.25,P=0.52),大洋洲人群OR=1.05(95%CI:0.80~ 1.38,P=0.73);按不同對照進行分組分析,醫院基礎OR=1.07(95% CI:0.95~1.20,P=0.28),人群基礎OR=1.13(95%CI:1.01 ~1.26,P=0.04).結論 Cyclin D1基因G870A多態性與結直腸癌易感性總體分析在統計學上具有相關性,按不同人群進行分組分析,都不支持具有相關性;按不同對照進行分組分析,以醫院基礎不具有相關性,以人群為基礎具有相關性.
목적 종합평개세포주기단백D1( Cyclin D1)기인G870A다태성여결직장암역감성적관계.방법 통과CNKI、PubMed、EMCC등수거고검색문헌,획득유관Cyclin D1기인G870A다태성여결직장암위험성관계적연구결과,병통과Meta분석진행계통평개.소유문헌균채용병례대조연구혹자소식병례대조연구,이OR치위효응지표,기인형재대조군체중적분포균부합Hardy-Weinberg유전평형정률,대문헌진행평개사선、이질성검험.본차Meta분석공납입23항연구,루계병례6344례,대조9018례,이용RevMan5.0대각연구원시결과진행통계처리,대돌변순합자AA화잡합자GA기인형여순합기인형GG진행비교,병계산합병OR치급기95%가신구간(CI).결과 AA화GA여GG기인형재병례조여건강대조조지간차이유통계학의의,OR=1.10(95%CI:1.01~ 1.19,P=0.02);안불동인군진행분층분석,아주인군OR=1.11(95%CI:0.98 ~1.26,P=0.11),미주인군OR=1.13(95%CI:0.97~1.32,P=0.12),구주인군OR=1.06(95% CI:0.89~1.25,P=0.52),대양주인군OR=1.05(95%CI:0.80~ 1.38,P=0.73);안불동대조진행분조분석,의원기출OR=1.07(95% CI:0.95~1.20,P=0.28),인군기출OR=1.13(95%CI:1.01 ~1.26,P=0.04).결론 Cyclin D1기인G870A다태성여결직장암역감성총체분석재통계학상구유상관성,안불동인군진행분조분석,도불지지구유상관성;안불동대조진행분조분석,이의원기출불구유상관성,이인군위기출구유상관성.
Objective To evaluate the association between Cyclin D1 G870A polymmphism and risk of colorectal cancer.Methods Extensive searches of relevant studies on datebase like PubMed,EMCC and CNKI were performed.Case control studies involving unrelated subjects and genotype frequencies in control group consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were included for the meta-analysis.Twenty-three case-control studies with 6 344 cases and 9 018 controls were analyzed by the fixed-effect or random-effect meta-analysis method.The metaanalysis was applied with RevMan 5.0 software for heterogeneity test.AA and GA were compared with those with GG genotype.Pooled OR value and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.Results There were statistical differences between AA & GA and GG.The pooled OR value was 1.10 (95%CI:1.01-1.19,P =0.02).The values were analyzed hierarchically according to different populations.The pooled OR value of Asian was 1.11 (95% CI:0.98-1.26,P=0.11).The pooled OR value of American was 1.13(95%CI:0.97-1.32,P=0.12).The pooled OR value of European was 1.06(95%CI:0.89-1.25,P =0.52).The pooled OR value of Oceanian was 1.05(95% CI:0.80-1.38,P=0.73).The values were analyzed hierarchically according to the comparison basis.The pooled OR value of hospital-based was 1.07 (95% CI:0.95-1.20,P =0.28).The pooled OR value of population-based was 1.13 (95%CI:1.01-1.26,P=0.04).Conclusion The Cyclin D1 G870A polymorphism is correlated with the susceptibility of colorectal cancer risk at the aggregate level analysis.Analysis by different methods:according to different populations,every group don't support the correlation.According to comparison basis,there has no correlation in hospital-based group,but there has correlation in population-based group.