中华麻醉学杂志
中華痳醉學雜誌
중화마취학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
2011年
9期
1062-1064
,共3页
王慧星%郑宝森%史可梅%刘靖芷%马文庭%张志峰%李全波
王慧星%鄭寶森%史可梅%劉靖芷%馬文庭%張誌峰%李全波
왕혜성%정보삼%사가매%류정지%마문정%장지봉%리전파
疱疹,带状%神经痛%Meta分析%普瑞巴林
皰疹,帶狀%神經痛%Meta分析%普瑞巴林
포진,대상%신경통%Meta분석%보서파림
Herpes zoster%Neuralgia%Meta-analysis%Pregabalin
目的 采用Meta分析评价普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的效果.方法 检索Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、万方和CNKI等数据库,检索时间从1966年1月至2010年12月.收集普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的随机安慰剂对照研究.采用改良Jadad法评价文献质量.以治疗8周时数字疼痛评分(NRS评分)、镇痛有效率和不良反应发生率为评价指标.采用Review Manager 4.2软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入4项研究,包括1024例患者.4项研究的Jadad评分均≥4分.分为安慰剂组和普瑞巴林组.与安慰剂组比较,普瑞巴林150、300和600 mg/d组NRS评分降低,镇痛有效率升高(P<0.05).普瑞巴林300.mg/d组与150mg/d组间NRS评分及镇痛有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);普瑞巴林600 mg/d组NRS评分低于300 mg/d组(P<0.05),而镇痛有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).普瑞巴林常见不良反应为头晕、嗜睡、水肿和头痛等,以轻、中度为主,不良反应发生与剂量有关.结论 普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的效果好,且安全性良好,但是减轻疼痛的效果不呈剂量依赖性.
目的 採用Meta分析評價普瑞巴林治療帶狀皰疹後神經痛的效果.方法 檢索Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、萬方和CNKI等數據庫,檢索時間從1966年1月至2010年12月.收集普瑞巴林治療帶狀皰疹後神經痛的隨機安慰劑對照研究.採用改良Jadad法評價文獻質量.以治療8週時數字疼痛評分(NRS評分)、鎮痛有效率和不良反應髮生率為評價指標.採用Review Manager 4.2軟件進行Meta分析.結果 共納入4項研究,包括1024例患者.4項研究的Jadad評分均≥4分.分為安慰劑組和普瑞巴林組.與安慰劑組比較,普瑞巴林150、300和600 mg/d組NRS評分降低,鎮痛有效率升高(P<0.05).普瑞巴林300.mg/d組與150mg/d組間NRS評分及鎮痛有效率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);普瑞巴林600 mg/d組NRS評分低于300 mg/d組(P<0.05),而鎮痛有效率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).普瑞巴林常見不良反應為頭暈、嗜睡、水腫和頭痛等,以輕、中度為主,不良反應髮生與劑量有關.結論 普瑞巴林治療帶狀皰疹後神經痛的效果好,且安全性良好,但是減輕疼痛的效果不呈劑量依賴性.
목적 채용Meta분석평개보서파림치료대상포진후신경통적효과.방법 검색Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、만방화CNKI등수거고,검색시간종1966년1월지2010년12월.수집보서파림치료대상포진후신경통적수궤안위제대조연구.채용개량Jadad법평개문헌질량.이치료8주시수자동통평분(NRS평분)、진통유효솔화불량반응발생솔위평개지표.채용Review Manager 4.2연건진행Meta분석.결과 공납입4항연구,포괄1024례환자.4항연구적Jadad평분균≥4분.분위안위제조화보서파림조.여안위제조비교,보서파림150、300화600 mg/d조NRS평분강저,진통유효솔승고(P<0.05).보서파림300.mg/d조여150mg/d조간NRS평분급진통유효솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);보서파림600 mg/d조NRS평분저우300 mg/d조(P<0.05),이진통유효솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).보서파림상견불량반응위두훈、기수、수종화두통등,이경、중도위주,불량반응발생여제량유관.결론 보서파림치료대상포진후신경통적효과호,차안전성량호,단시감경동통적효과불정제량의뢰성.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.Methods A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify all randomized placebo-controlled trials of pregabalin in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.Medline,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Wanfang Database and CNKI were searched from January 1966 up to December 2008.The modified Jadad scale was used for quality assessment.Numerical rating scale ( NRS),effective analgesia rate and the incidence of adverse effects were taken as main outcomes.Meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager 4.2 software.Results A total of four studies involving 1024 patients were included in this meta-analysis.The modified Jadad scale scores for the 4 studies were ≥ 4.The NRS scores were significantly lower,while effective analgesia rate was higher in groups 150,300,600 mg/d than placebo-controlled group (P < 0.05).There were no significant differences in NRS scores and effective analgesia rate between 150 mg/d and 300 mg/d groups.The NRS scores were significantly lower in 600 mg/d group than in 300 mg/d group,but there were no significant differences in effective analgesia rate between 600 mg/d and 300 mg/d groups.The most frequent adverse effects were dizziness,somnolence,peripheral edema,and headache.Most of the adverse effects were mild or moderate in intensity.The occurrence of adverse effects appeared to be dose-related.Conclusion Pregabalin is effective and safe in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia,but the efficacy of reducing pain is not a dose-dependent manner.