中国组织工程研究与临床康复
中國組織工程研究與臨床康複
중국조직공정연구여림상강복
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL REHABILITATIVE TISSUE ENGINEERING RESEARCH
2010年
4期
609-614
,共6页
梁春祥%陈克冰%刘少喻%韩国伟%龙厚清%魏富鑫%黄阳亮
樑春祥%陳剋冰%劉少喻%韓國偉%龍厚清%魏富鑫%黃暘亮
량춘상%진극빙%류소유%한국위%룡후청%위부흠%황양량
腰椎%动态稳定%失稳%非融合%棘突
腰椎%動態穩定%失穩%非融閤%棘突
요추%동태은정%실은%비융합%극돌
背景:为保证可控制范围内的脊柱运动,改变失稳节段运动的负荷模式,并限制其异常活动,同时避免相邻节段椎间盘退变的发生,多种后路腰椎非融合固定装置被研发并用于临床.目的:探讨Wallis动态稳定系统治疗腰椎失稳症的临床效果.方法:选择中山大学附属第一医院脊柱外科收治的腰椎失稳症患者10例,男3例,女7例,年龄43-65岁,其中失稳节段1例为L_(1/2)和L_(4/5),1例为L_(2/3),1例为L_(3/4),其余均为L_(4/5)倒合并相同节段腰椎间盘突出症2例,腰椎管狭窄症7例,相邻节段腰椎管狭窄症3例:失稳节段均行后路椎管减压、Wallis置入固定治疗.观察治疗前后视觉模拟VAS评分、下腰痛JOA评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数变化;失稳节段和相邻节段的活动范围及L_(4/5)节段椎间盘后高度的变化.结果与结论:10例患者均获得随访,随访时间2-13个月,平均9.2个月.手术时间平均128 min(90-185 min),术中平均出血量264 mL(50-600 mL).腰痛均消失,术后患者的症状和体征均有明显改善;1例置入治疗后3个月因L_(4/5)右侧腰椎管狭窄症复发,再行开窗减压术后症状消失.治疗后VAS评分较术前显著降低(P=0.003);JOA评分较术前显著增加(P=0.002),ODI评分较术前显著降低(P=0.008).术后L_(4/5)节段的活动范围与术前相比明显减少(P<0.05),而术后相邻节段L_(3/4)、L_5/S_1的活动范围与术前相比差异无显著性意义(p>0.05).提示Wallis动态稳定系统置入治疗腰椎失稳症能够取得比较满意的临床效果.
揹景:為保證可控製範圍內的脊柱運動,改變失穩節段運動的負荷模式,併限製其異常活動,同時避免相鄰節段椎間盤退變的髮生,多種後路腰椎非融閤固定裝置被研髮併用于臨床.目的:探討Wallis動態穩定繫統治療腰椎失穩癥的臨床效果.方法:選擇中山大學附屬第一醫院脊柱外科收治的腰椎失穩癥患者10例,男3例,女7例,年齡43-65歲,其中失穩節段1例為L_(1/2)和L_(4/5),1例為L_(2/3),1例為L_(3/4),其餘均為L_(4/5)倒閤併相同節段腰椎間盤突齣癥2例,腰椎管狹窄癥7例,相鄰節段腰椎管狹窄癥3例:失穩節段均行後路椎管減壓、Wallis置入固定治療.觀察治療前後視覺模擬VAS評分、下腰痛JOA評分、Oswestry功能障礙指數變化;失穩節段和相鄰節段的活動範圍及L_(4/5)節段椎間盤後高度的變化.結果與結論:10例患者均穫得隨訪,隨訪時間2-13箇月,平均9.2箇月.手術時間平均128 min(90-185 min),術中平均齣血量264 mL(50-600 mL).腰痛均消失,術後患者的癥狀和體徵均有明顯改善;1例置入治療後3箇月因L_(4/5)右側腰椎管狹窄癥複髮,再行開窗減壓術後癥狀消失.治療後VAS評分較術前顯著降低(P=0.003);JOA評分較術前顯著增加(P=0.002),ODI評分較術前顯著降低(P=0.008).術後L_(4/5)節段的活動範圍與術前相比明顯減少(P<0.05),而術後相鄰節段L_(3/4)、L_5/S_1的活動範圍與術前相比差異無顯著性意義(p>0.05).提示Wallis動態穩定繫統置入治療腰椎失穩癥能夠取得比較滿意的臨床效果.
배경:위보증가공제범위내적척주운동,개변실은절단운동적부하모식,병한제기이상활동,동시피면상린절단추간반퇴변적발생,다충후로요추비융합고정장치피연발병용우림상.목적:탐토Wallis동태은정계통치료요추실은증적림상효과.방법:선택중산대학부속제일의원척주외과수치적요추실은증환자10례,남3례,녀7례,년령43-65세,기중실은절단1례위L_(1/2)화L_(4/5),1례위L_(2/3),1례위L_(3/4),기여균위L_(4/5)도합병상동절단요추간반돌출증2례,요추관협착증7례,상린절단요추관협착증3례:실은절단균행후로추관감압、Wallis치입고정치료.관찰치료전후시각모의VAS평분、하요통JOA평분、Oswestry공능장애지수변화;실은절단화상린절단적활동범위급L_(4/5)절단추간반후고도적변화.결과여결론:10례환자균획득수방,수방시간2-13개월,평균9.2개월.수술시간평균128 min(90-185 min),술중평균출혈량264 mL(50-600 mL).요통균소실,술후환자적증상화체정균유명현개선;1례치입치료후3개월인L_(4/5)우측요추관협착증복발,재행개창감압술후증상소실.치료후VAS평분교술전현저강저(P=0.003);JOA평분교술전현저증가(P=0.002),ODI평분교술전현저강저(P=0.008).술후L_(4/5)절단적활동범위여술전상비명현감소(P<0.05),이술후상린절단L_(3/4)、L_5/S_1적활동범위여술전상비차이무현저성의의(p>0.05).제시Wallis동태은정계통치입치료요추실은증능구취득비교만의적림상효과.
BACKGROUND: Posterior lumbar non-fusion devices have been developed to control vertebral column movement, change load pattern of instability segment, restrict abnormal action, as well as avoid adjacent segment degeneration.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of Wallis dynamic stabilization system in the treatment of lumbar vertebrae instability.METHODS: Ten cases suffering from lumbar instability were selected, including 3 males and 7 females, aged 43-65 years. One patient sustained L_(1/2) and L_(4/5) segmental instability, one was L_(2/3) and another was L_(3/4), and the others were L_(4/5). Two patients complicated with lumbar disc herniation and 7 patients combined with lumbar spinal stenosis at the same affected segment, and 3 patients associated with lumbar spinal stenosis at adjacent segment. All unstable segments were treated with decompression, posterior implantation of Wallis dynamic stabilization system. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores for low back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. In addition, therange of motion (ROM) at the instrumented segment and adjacent segments and posterior disc height (PDH) in standing and extension position at L_(4/5) segment were also measured.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: All the patients were followed-up for 2-13 months, mean 9.2 months. The mean operation duration was 128 minutes (90-185 minutes), with bleeding volume of 264 Ml (50-600 Ml). Sings and symptoms of all patients were improved significantly after operation, except one patient with recurrence of L_(4/5) lumbar spinal stenosis at 3 month after surgery, whose symptoms relieved by revision with fenestration and decompression. The postoperative VAS was dramatically decreased than that of preoperation (P=0.003); the JOA score was obviously increased (P=0.002), and the ODI score was decreased (p=0.008). The postoperative range of motion decreased significantly (P<0.05). However, there was no obviously difference between preoperative and postoperative L_(3/4), L_5/S_1 and posterior disc height (P>0.05). Good clinical results can be achieved by surgical intervention with Wallis dynamic stabilization system in treating lumbar vertebrae instability.