高电压技术
高電壓技術
고전압기술
HIGH VOLTAGE ENGINEERING
2009年
11期
2674-2679
,共6页
张鑫%蒋兴良%张志劲%胡建林%肖代波
張鑫%蔣興良%張誌勁%鬍建林%肖代波
장흠%장흥량%장지경%호건림%초대파
污秽试验%人工污秽%污秽绝缘子%试验方式%污闪特性%闪络电压%污秽程度
汙穢試驗%人工汙穢%汙穢絕緣子%試驗方式%汙閃特性%閃絡電壓%汙穢程度
오예시험%인공오예%오예절연자%시험방식%오섬특성%섬락전압%오예정도
pollution test%artificial pollution%pollution insulator%test method%pollution flashover performance%flashover voltage%pollution degree
人工污秽试验是研究污闪特性的重要手段,IEC及我国标准推荐了多种人工污秽试验方法以进行绝缘子闪络特性的试验研究,并提出了几种不同的试验方式,目前常用的有均匀升压法、50%耐受电压法和最大耐受法,但对于不同试验方式下绝缘子污闪特性的差异仍需进行系统研究和比较.为了研究不同试验方式下绝缘子污闪特性的差异,以两种典型的瓷(XP-160)和玻璃(LXY_4-160)绝缘子为例,在人工雾室中对3种不同试验方式下绝缘子污闪特性进行了分析和比较.试验结果表明:不同试验方式下绝缘子的闪络特性有一定的差异.不同污秽程度下,均匀升压法得到的污闪电压U_(av)比50%耐受电压法得到的污闪电压U_(50%)升高了4.27%~12.62%,U_(50%)比最大耐受电压法得到的污闪电压U_(ws)升高了3.94%~13.20%.随着污秽程度的增大,U_(av)相对U_(50%)提高的百分比和U_(50%)相对于U_(ws)提高的百分比均逐渐增大.
人工汙穢試驗是研究汙閃特性的重要手段,IEC及我國標準推薦瞭多種人工汙穢試驗方法以進行絕緣子閃絡特性的試驗研究,併提齣瞭幾種不同的試驗方式,目前常用的有均勻升壓法、50%耐受電壓法和最大耐受法,但對于不同試驗方式下絕緣子汙閃特性的差異仍需進行繫統研究和比較.為瞭研究不同試驗方式下絕緣子汙閃特性的差異,以兩種典型的瓷(XP-160)和玻璃(LXY_4-160)絕緣子為例,在人工霧室中對3種不同試驗方式下絕緣子汙閃特性進行瞭分析和比較.試驗結果錶明:不同試驗方式下絕緣子的閃絡特性有一定的差異.不同汙穢程度下,均勻升壓法得到的汙閃電壓U_(av)比50%耐受電壓法得到的汙閃電壓U_(50%)升高瞭4.27%~12.62%,U_(50%)比最大耐受電壓法得到的汙閃電壓U_(ws)升高瞭3.94%~13.20%.隨著汙穢程度的增大,U_(av)相對U_(50%)提高的百分比和U_(50%)相對于U_(ws)提高的百分比均逐漸增大.
인공오예시험시연구오섬특성적중요수단,IEC급아국표준추천료다충인공오예시험방법이진행절연자섬락특성적시험연구,병제출료궤충불동적시험방식,목전상용적유균균승압법、50%내수전압법화최대내수법,단대우불동시험방식하절연자오섬특성적차이잉수진행계통연구화비교.위료연구불동시험방식하절연자오섬특성적차이,이량충전형적자(XP-160)화파리(LXY_4-160)절연자위례,재인공무실중대3충불동시험방식하절연자오섬특성진행료분석화비교.시험결과표명:불동시험방식하절연자적섬락특성유일정적차이.불동오예정도하,균균승압법득도적오섬전압U_(av)비50%내수전압법득도적오섬전압U_(50%)승고료4.27%~12.62%,U_(50%)비최대내수전압법득도적오섬전압U_(ws)승고료3.94%~13.20%.수착오예정도적증대,U_(av)상대U_(50%)제고적백분비화U_(50%)상대우U_(ws)제고적백분비균축점증대.
The artificial pollution test is an important method for studying pollution flashover performance.Some different artificial pollution methods are adopted to study the pollution flashover performance in IEC and correlative standards,and several different manners of test are compared.The methods of uniform increase voltage,50% withstand voltage and maximum withstand voltage are commonly used, but the difference among them are not comparatively studied.Taking two types of typical porcelain(XP-160)and glass(LXY_4-160)standard insulators as examples,in order to study differences of insulator flashover performance under different manners,the AC pollution flashover performance of insulators under three different manners of test in the climate chamber was analyzed and compared.The test results show that there are some differences in the pollution flashover performance under different manners.Under different pollution degrees,the pollution flashover voltage of uniform increase voltage(U_(av))is4.27% to 12.62% higher than 50%withstand voltage(U_(50%)),U_(50%)is 3.94% to 13.20% higher than maximum withstand voltage(U_(ws)).Along with the increase of pollution degree,the increase percentage of Uav in comparison with U_(50%)and U_(50%)in comparison with Uws are gradually enlarged.