常州大学学报：社会科学版
常州大學學報：社會科學版
상주대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Jiangsu Polyetchnic University:Social Science Edition
2011年
4期
15-19
,共5页
危险驾驶罪%社会危害性%民意%司法成本%协调性
危險駕駛罪%社會危害性%民意%司法成本%協調性
위험가사죄%사회위해성%민의%사법성본%협조성
hazardous driving%a crime against public security%public call%legal costs%coordinationy
刑法修正案（八）已设立＂危险驾驶罪＂,但危险驾驶机动车的行为尚未达到应受刑罚处罚程度;目前的法律手段能够达到预防、减少危险驾驶机动车行为,保护人民群众的生命、健康和财产安全的目的;没有充分的根据说明设立＂危险驾驶罪＂是民意,即使是民意,也未必是设立＂危险驾驶罪＂的充分理由;设立＂危险驾驶罪＂将大大增加社会成本,与我国现有刑法原则精神和现行刑法规定不协调。
刑法脩正案（八）已設立＂危險駕駛罪＂,但危險駕駛機動車的行為尚未達到應受刑罰處罰程度;目前的法律手段能夠達到預防、減少危險駕駛機動車行為,保護人民群衆的生命、健康和財產安全的目的;沒有充分的根據說明設立＂危險駕駛罪＂是民意,即使是民意,也未必是設立＂危險駕駛罪＂的充分理由;設立＂危險駕駛罪＂將大大增加社會成本,與我國現有刑法原則精神和現行刑法規定不協調。
형법수정안（팔）이설립＂위험가사죄＂,단위험가사궤동차적행위상미체도응수형벌처벌정도;목전적법률수단능구체도예방、감소위험가사궤동차행위,보호인민군음적생명、건강화재산안전적목적;몰유충분적근거설명설립＂위험가사죄＂시민의,즉사시민의,야미필시설립＂위험가사죄＂적충분이유;설립＂위험가사죄＂장대대증가사회성본,여아국현유형법원칙정신화현행형법규정불협조。
The newly amended Criminal Law（Eight） has defined ＂Hazardous Driving＂ as a criminal offence,but the act of drunk driving itself does not necessarily result in a traffic accident so as to be convicted.The legal means before this amendment can serve the purpose of deterring people from drunk driving and protecting the life,health and property of human beings.There is not sufficient evidence that the new amendment is the result in response to the public call.Even if it is,it is far from justified.The new offence of hazardous driving is going to increase costs on the social resources and is not in line with the country＇s present judicial principles and the criminal law,and so makes it difficult to handle specific cases.
