中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2011年
1期
16-17
,共2页
陈国立%吴献伟%林海滨%傅福仁%张威%陈宣煌%戴建辉
陳國立%吳獻偉%林海濱%傅福仁%張威%陳宣煌%戴建輝
진국립%오헌위%림해빈%부복인%장위%진선황%대건휘
脊柱炎,强直性%关节成形术,置换,髋
脊柱炎,彊直性%關節成形術,置換,髖
척주염,강직성%관절성형술,치환,관
Spondylitis,ankylosing%Arthroplasty,replacement,hip
目的 探讨全髋关节置换术治疗强直性脊柱炎髋关节骨性强直的临床疗效.方法 将强直性脊柱炎髋关节骨性强直患者43例遵照知情同意原则随机分为观察组(23例)和对照组(20例),分别采用全髋关节置换术与保守治疗,比较分析两组患者的临床疗效.结果 观察组患者的术后髋关节Harris评分及VAS疼痛评分均明显优于对照组,组间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).两组优良率分别为91.3%、60.0%,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.328,P<0.05).结论 全髋关节置换术治疗强直性脊柱炎髋关节骨性强直的临床疗效佳,可以提高患者的生活质量,值得临床推广应用.
目的 探討全髖關節置換術治療彊直性脊柱炎髖關節骨性彊直的臨床療效.方法 將彊直性脊柱炎髖關節骨性彊直患者43例遵照知情同意原則隨機分為觀察組(23例)和對照組(20例),分彆採用全髖關節置換術與保守治療,比較分析兩組患者的臨床療效.結果 觀察組患者的術後髖關節Harris評分及VAS疼痛評分均明顯優于對照組,組間差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05).兩組優良率分彆為91.3%、60.0%,差異有統計學意義(x2=4.328,P<0.05).結論 全髖關節置換術治療彊直性脊柱炎髖關節骨性彊直的臨床療效佳,可以提高患者的生活質量,值得臨床推廣應用.
목적 탐토전관관절치환술치료강직성척주염관관절골성강직적림상료효.방법 장강직성척주염관관절골성강직환자43례준조지정동의원칙수궤분위관찰조(23례)화대조조(20례),분별채용전관관절치환술여보수치료,비교분석량조환자적림상료효.결과 관찰조환자적술후관관절Harris평분급VAS동통평분균명현우우대조조,조간차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05).량조우량솔분별위91.3%、60.0%,차이유통계학의의(x2=4.328,P<0.05).결론 전관관절치환술치료강직성척주염관관절골성강직적림상료효가,가이제고환자적생활질량,치득림상추엄응용.
Objective To investigate the effect of total hip arthroplasty in treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and bilateral hip bony ankylosis. Methods 43 patients with ankylosing spondylitis and bilateral hip bony ankylosis were randomly divided into observation group (23 cases) and control group (20 cases) in accordance with the principle of informed consent, individually treated by total hip arthroplasty and conservative treatment, the effect of two groups were compared and analyzed. Results In the observation group, the postoperative Harris hip score and the VAS pain score of patients were significantly better than the control group,the differences were all statistically significant between two groups( all P < 0.05 ). Excellent rate of the two groups were 91.3% and 60.0% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( x2 = 4.328, P < 0.05 ). Conclusion Total hip arthroplasty in treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and bilateral hip bony ankylosis has better clinical effect, and could improve the quality of life of patients, so it was worthy of clinical application.