CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨置管冲洗引流方式治疗耳前瘘管感染的临床疗效.方法随机抽取2008年至2011年期间耳前瘘管感染的患者48例,根据治疗方式将患者分为置管引流组和常规切开引流组,各有24例.对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较.结果相对于常规切开引流组,置管引流组患者的换药疼痛度相对较小,脓肿愈合时间相对较短;常规切开引流组痊愈率为70.83％,明显小于置管引流组的治愈率(91.67％),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论采用置管冲洗引流治疗方式对耳前瘘管感染患者进行治疗,比用其他治疗方式起效快、疼痛小、治愈率高、安全性高,有积极的临床意义,值得推广.
목적 탐토치관충세인류방식치료이전루관감염적림상료효.방법 수궤추취2008년지2011년기간이전루관감염적환자48례,근거치료방식장환자분위치관인류조화상규절개인류조,각유24례.대량조환자적치료효과진행비교.결과 상대우상규절개인류조,치관인류조환자적환약동통도상대교소,농종유합시간상대교단;상규절개인류조전유솔위70.83％,명현소우치관인류조적치유솔(91.67％),차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 채용치관충세인류치료방식대이전루관감염환자진행치료,비용기타치료방식기효쾌、동통소、치유솔고、안전성고,유적겁적림상의의,치득추엄.
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of irrigation and drainage by tube placement for preauricular fistula infection.Methods 48 patients who had been treated during the period of 2009 to 2010 were randomly divided into a group of drainage by tube placement and a group of conventional drainage by incision,24 for each group.The efficacy was compared between the two groups.Results Level of pain associated with dressing change was smaller and healing time of the wound was shorter in the group of tube placement than in the group of incision.The cure rate was significantly lower in the group of incision than in the group of tube placement ( 70.83％ vs.91.67％,P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusions For the patients with preauricular fistula infection,irrigation and drainage by tube placement,as compared with other therapies,has a quicker onset,less pain,a higher cure rate,greater safety,and certain positive significance.It is worth popularizing.