中华医学杂志(英文版)
中華醫學雜誌(英文版)
중화의학잡지(영문판)
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
2002年
6期
897-899
,共3页
G Neil Thomas%赵海潞%马艳青%梁润成%陈重娥%汤宁信%郭志良
G Neil Thomas%趙海潞%馬豔青%樑潤成%陳重娥%湯寧信%郭誌良
G Neil Thomas%조해로%마염청%량윤성%진중아%탕저신%곽지량
老年%中国人%肥胖%性别
老年%中國人%肥胖%性彆
노년%중국인%비반%성별
elderly%Chinese%obesity%gender
目的研究中国老年人体脂含量及其分布与多种心血管危险因子之间的相互关系.方法共135名中国老年人研究对象,年龄在60至65岁之间,均无明显心、肾、肝疾病.观察项目包括坐位血压、人体测量指标和空腹血浆生化参数.应用学生t检验来处理男女两组之间生化和人体测量指标的差异.结果男性比女性老年人较重(64.6±8.6 kg, 57.2±8.2 kg, P<0.001)、较高(1.65±0.06 m, 1.51±0.05 m, P<0.001),而且体脂主要分布在腹部 (腰臀比例 0.91±0.06, 0.88±0.07, P<0.05). 相比之下,女性老年人比较肥胖,平均体重指数大 (23.8±4.6 kg/m2, 25.0±3.5 kg/m2, P<0.05) 以及体脂百分含量高[26.3% (24.5%-28.1%) vs 37.2% (36.0%-38.9%), P<0.001].但是,尽管女性比男性老年人的体脂含量要高出11%,两组之间的血压、血脂、胰岛素抵抗参数或白蛋白-肌酐比值却没有显著差异. 结论尽管中国老年男性比女性要瘦一些,但是男性的中心性肥胖很可能更容易导致他们出现代谢异常.
目的研究中國老年人體脂含量及其分佈與多種心血管危險因子之間的相互關繫.方法共135名中國老年人研究對象,年齡在60至65歲之間,均無明顯心、腎、肝疾病.觀察項目包括坐位血壓、人體測量指標和空腹血漿生化參數.應用學生t檢驗來處理男女兩組之間生化和人體測量指標的差異.結果男性比女性老年人較重(64.6±8.6 kg, 57.2±8.2 kg, P<0.001)、較高(1.65±0.06 m, 1.51±0.05 m, P<0.001),而且體脂主要分佈在腹部 (腰臀比例 0.91±0.06, 0.88±0.07, P<0.05). 相比之下,女性老年人比較肥胖,平均體重指數大 (23.8±4.6 kg/m2, 25.0±3.5 kg/m2, P<0.05) 以及體脂百分含量高[26.3% (24.5%-28.1%) vs 37.2% (36.0%-38.9%), P<0.001].但是,儘管女性比男性老年人的體脂含量要高齣11%,兩組之間的血壓、血脂、胰島素牴抗參數或白蛋白-肌酐比值卻沒有顯著差異. 結論儘管中國老年男性比女性要瘦一些,但是男性的中心性肥胖很可能更容易導緻他們齣現代謝異常.
목적연구중국노년인체지함량급기분포여다충심혈관위험인자지간적상호관계.방법공135명중국노년인연구대상,년령재60지65세지간,균무명현심、신、간질병.관찰항목포괄좌위혈압、인체측량지표화공복혈장생화삼수.응용학생t검험래처리남녀량조지간생화화인체측량지표적차이.결과남성비녀성노년인교중(64.6±8.6 kg, 57.2±8.2 kg, P<0.001)、교고(1.65±0.06 m, 1.51±0.05 m, P<0.001),이차체지주요분포재복부 (요둔비례 0.91±0.06, 0.88±0.07, P<0.05). 상비지하,녀성노년인비교비반,평균체중지수대 (23.8±4.6 kg/m2, 25.0±3.5 kg/m2, P<0.05) 이급체지백분함량고[26.3% (24.5%-28.1%) vs 37.2% (36.0%-38.9%), P<0.001].단시,진관녀성비남성노년인적체지함량요고출11%,량조지간적혈압、혈지、이도소저항삼수혹백단백-기항비치각몰유현저차이. 결론진관중국노년남성비녀성요수일사,단시남성적중심성비반흔가능경용역도치타문출현대사이상.
Objective To investigate the relative effects of degree and distribution of body fat with several cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in elderly Chinese subjects.Methods One-hundred and thirty-five elderly Chinese individuals (age range, 60-65 y) without any history of significant renal, hepatic or cardiac disease were recruited. Seated blood pressure, anthropometric and fasting plasma biochemical parameters were measured. Student's t-test was used to compare the differences in biochemical and anthropometric markers between cohorts.Results Males were heavier (64.6±8.6, 57.2±8.2*!kg, P<0.001), taller (1.65±0.06, 1.51±0.05 m, P<0.001) and their greater body fat was predominantly deposited centrally (Waist-to-hip ratio, 0.91±0.06, 0.88±0.07, P<0.05). Females were more generally obese with increased body mass index (BMI, 23.8±4.6, 25.0±3.5 kg/m2, P<0.05) and percentage body fat [26.3% (24.5%-28.1%) vs 37.2% (36.0%-38.9%), P<0.001] than the males. However, despite an 11% higher proportion of body fat in females, no significant differences were identified in blood pressure, lipid profile, indices of insulin resistance or albumin-to-creatinine ratios.Conclusion It is likely that central adiposity contributes disproportionately to these metabolic disorders in males even though they are much leaner than elderly Chinese females.