中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
16期
1889-1891
,共3页
心血管疾病%溶血%血液凝固%血标本
心血管疾病%溶血%血液凝固%血標本
심혈관질병%용혈%혈액응고%혈표본
Cardiovascular disease%Hemolysis%Coagulation%Blood sample
目的 通过调查并分析心血管病患者血标本实验室分析前凝血、溶血原因,采取预防血标本凝血、溶血的采集方法,减少凝血、溶血发生.方法 选取心血管病患者的血标本随机分为对照组7396份和实验组7334份,对照组血标本按照以往习惯采集及运送,实验组对血标本采集、标本运送、实验室传输等环节进行统一标化,分别记录对照组与实验组血标本的凝血、溶血原因、数量及种类,比较两组血标本不合格率及凝血、溶血不合格率.结果 实验组标本不合格率为0.21％,低于对照组的0.82％,差异具有统计学意义(x2=27.599,P＜0.01)；实验组标本凝血、溶血不合格率为0.18％显著低于对照组的0.65％,差异有统计学意义(x2=19.923,P＜0.01).结论 加强对血标本检验前质量控制可有效减少不合格标本中的凝血、溶血标本数量,从而提高血标本质量,为临床疾病的诊断提供可靠、准确的科学依据.
目的 通過調查併分析心血管病患者血標本實驗室分析前凝血、溶血原因,採取預防血標本凝血、溶血的採集方法,減少凝血、溶血髮生.方法 選取心血管病患者的血標本隨機分為對照組7396份和實驗組7334份,對照組血標本按照以往習慣採集及運送,實驗組對血標本採集、標本運送、實驗室傳輸等環節進行統一標化,分彆記錄對照組與實驗組血標本的凝血、溶血原因、數量及種類,比較兩組血標本不閤格率及凝血、溶血不閤格率.結果 實驗組標本不閤格率為0.21％,低于對照組的0.82％,差異具有統計學意義(x2=27.599,P＜0.01)；實驗組標本凝血、溶血不閤格率為0.18％顯著低于對照組的0.65％,差異有統計學意義(x2=19.923,P＜0.01).結論 加彊對血標本檢驗前質量控製可有效減少不閤格標本中的凝血、溶血標本數量,從而提高血標本質量,為臨床疾病的診斷提供可靠、準確的科學依據.
목적 통과조사병분석심혈관병환자혈표본실험실분석전응혈、용혈원인,채취예방혈표본응혈、용혈적채집방법,감소응혈、용혈발생.방법 선취심혈관병환자적혈표본수궤분위대조조7396빈화실험조7334빈,대조조혈표본안조이왕습관채집급운송,실험조대혈표본채집、표본운송、실험실전수등배절진행통일표화,분별기록대조조여실험조혈표본적응혈、용혈원인、수량급충류,비교량조혈표본불합격솔급응혈、용혈불합격솔.결과 실험조표본불합격솔위0.21％,저우대조조적0.82％,차이구유통계학의의(x2=27.599,P＜0.01)；실험조표본응혈、용혈불합격솔위0.18％현저저우대조조적0.65％,차이유통계학의의(x2=19.923,P＜0.01).결론 가강대혈표본검험전질량공제가유효감소불합격표본중적응혈、용혈표본수량,종이제고혈표본질량,위림상질병적진단제공가고、준학적과학의거.
Objective To study the causes of coagulation and hemolysis of blood samples collected from cardiovascular disease patients and the method to prevent its happening in order to reduce the numbers of coagulation and hemolysis samples.Methods All the blood samples of cardiovascular disease patients were randomly divided into control group( n =7396)and experimental group (n =7334 ).Control group was collected and transported according to the traditional methods,while the experimental group adopted standard control in sample collecting,transporting,laboratory transmission.Causes of the blood sample coagulation and hemolysis in two groups were observed.Results Unqualified blood samples ratio of experimental group was 0.21％significantly lower than 0.82％ that of the control group ( x2 =27.599,P ＜ 0.01 ).The ratio of coagulation and hemolysis of experimental group was 0.18％,and that of control group was 0.65％,and the difference was statistically significant (x2 =19.923,P ＜ 0.01).Conclusions Quality control of each procedure in the blood sample before examination can effectively reduce the number of unqualified blood coagulation and hemolysis and improve the quality of overall blood samples,and further provide reliable and accurate scientific evidence for disease diagnosis.
