中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2009年
11期
18-21
,共4页
刘化侠%李蕾%李义召%张爱华
劉化俠%李蕾%李義召%張愛華
류화협%리뢰%리의소%장애화
认知障碍%疼痛%评估%效度%信度
認知障礙%疼痛%評估%效度%信度
인지장애%동통%평고%효도%신도
Cognitive impairment%Pain%Assessment%Validity%Reliability
目的 开发认知障碍疼痛评估量表(PACIE)并检验其效度和信度.方法 参考国外的疼痛评估工具,编制认知障碍疼痛评估量表.分别请疼痛、麻醉、护理方面5位专家进行内容效度的评定并修改,由经过统一培训的评定员对认知障碍老年人的疼痛程度进行评估,并临床检验量表的效度和信度.结果 PACIE包括8个条目,内容效度指数为0.978,经因子分析得到2个公因子,累积解释方差的69.008%.2个公因子归为疼痛客观表现因子和疼痛主观表现因子.PACIE总分与NRS得分具有高度相关性,能正确区分认知障碍疼痛患者与认知障碍无疼痛患者.PACIE评定者间组内相关系数为0.954(95%CI为0.812~0.989),量表总分的Cronbach'α为0.851.结论 PACIE具有良好的信度和效度,指标客观,简单有效,可用于认知障碍老年人的疼痛评估.
目的 開髮認知障礙疼痛評估量錶(PACIE)併檢驗其效度和信度.方法 參攷國外的疼痛評估工具,編製認知障礙疼痛評估量錶.分彆請疼痛、痳醉、護理方麵5位專傢進行內容效度的評定併脩改,由經過統一培訓的評定員對認知障礙老年人的疼痛程度進行評估,併臨床檢驗量錶的效度和信度.結果 PACIE包括8箇條目,內容效度指數為0.978,經因子分析得到2箇公因子,纍積解釋方差的69.008%.2箇公因子歸為疼痛客觀錶現因子和疼痛主觀錶現因子.PACIE總分與NRS得分具有高度相關性,能正確區分認知障礙疼痛患者與認知障礙無疼痛患者.PACIE評定者間組內相關繫數為0.954(95%CI為0.812~0.989),量錶總分的Cronbach'α為0.851.結論 PACIE具有良好的信度和效度,指標客觀,簡單有效,可用于認知障礙老年人的疼痛評估.
목적 개발인지장애동통평고량표(PACIE)병검험기효도화신도.방법 삼고국외적동통평고공구,편제인지장애동통평고량표.분별청동통、마취、호리방면5위전가진행내용효도적평정병수개,유경과통일배훈적평정원대인지장애노년인적동통정도진행평고,병림상검험량표적효도화신도.결과 PACIE포괄8개조목,내용효도지수위0.978,경인자분석득도2개공인자,루적해석방차적69.008%.2개공인자귀위동통객관표현인자화동통주관표현인자.PACIE총분여NRS득분구유고도상관성,능정학구분인지장애동통환자여인지장애무동통환자.PACIE평정자간조내상관계수위0.954(95%CI위0.812~0.989),량표총분적Cronbach'α위0.851.결론 PACIE구유량호적신도화효도,지표객관,간단유효,가용우인지장애노년인적동통평고.
Objective To develop pain assessment scale for cognifively impaired elderly (PACIE) and to test its reliabihty and validity. Methods Based on the foreign related pain assessment tools, the pain as-sessment scale for cognitively impaired elderly was developed. Five experts specialized in pain, anaesthesia and nursing were invited to evaluate the content validity of the pain assessment instrument and made modification. Reliability and validity of the pain assessment instruments was evaluated. Results PACIE had 8 items, index of content validity (CVI) of PACIE was 0.978, factor analysis demonstrated that two factors soluted in PACIE, that cumulative explained 69.008% of the total variability, the two factors were named pain objective factor and pain subjective factor. PACIE and NRS were significantly correlated, it could identify pain and painlessness patients overtly that demonstrate the discriminate validity was fine. Adequate levels of inter-rater reliability of PACIE was achieved between two raters with the intra-class correlation coefficient as 0.954 (95%CI=0.812~ 0.989). Satisfactory test-retest reliability was achieved with the Cronbach'α ot as 0.851. Conclusions The pain assessment scale for cognitively impaired elderly (PAC1E) has satisfactory validity and reliability, is suit-able for assessing the pain indentity of cognitively impaired elderly.