中国医学影像技术
中國醫學影像技術
중국의학영상기술
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY
2010年
3期
574-577
,共4页
陈群林%孙辉红%林征宇%陈小荣%江飞
陳群林%孫輝紅%林徵宇%陳小榮%江飛
진군림%손휘홍%림정우%진소영%강비
下肢%静脉造影术%体层摄影术,X线计算机
下肢%靜脈造影術%體層攝影術,X線計算機
하지%정맥조영술%체층섭영술,X선계산궤
Lower extremity%Phlebography%Tomography,X-ray computed
目的 讨论多层螺旋CT直接下肢静脉造影增强扫描的对比剂注射方式、浓度和延迟时间,寻求较为理想的CT直接下肢静脉造影方案.方法 选择下肢静脉疾病患者32例,采用不同对比剂浓度与不同注射速率进行CT直接下肢静脉造影检查,并对图像对比分析,22例与X线下肢静脉造影进行分节段静脉显示能力对比分析.结果 血流相关性伪影为影响CT下肢静脉造影图像质量的主要因素,注射速率1.5 ml/s和2.5 ml/s组的图像评级差异有统计学意义(χ~2=5.495,P=0.019),稀释浓度为25%与15%的图像评级差异无统计学意义(χ~2=3.333,P=0.068).CT下肢静脉造影与X线下肢静脉造影在胫前静脉、胫后静脉、腘静脉与股静脉显示能力相同(χ~2=2.095,P=0.148),CT下肢静脉造影显示髂静脉的能力优于X线下肢静脉造影(χ~2=8.324,P=0.004).结论 CT下肢静脉造影髂静脉优于X线下肢静脉造影;采用延迟50 s经足背静脉以2.5 ml/s速度注射45 mgI/ml浓度(非离子型300 mgI/ml对比剂稀释15%)可获得较满意的诊断图像.
目的 討論多層螺鏇CT直接下肢靜脈造影增彊掃描的對比劑註射方式、濃度和延遲時間,尋求較為理想的CT直接下肢靜脈造影方案.方法 選擇下肢靜脈疾病患者32例,採用不同對比劑濃度與不同註射速率進行CT直接下肢靜脈造影檢查,併對圖像對比分析,22例與X線下肢靜脈造影進行分節段靜脈顯示能力對比分析.結果 血流相關性偽影為影響CT下肢靜脈造影圖像質量的主要因素,註射速率1.5 ml/s和2.5 ml/s組的圖像評級差異有統計學意義(χ~2=5.495,P=0.019),稀釋濃度為25%與15%的圖像評級差異無統計學意義(χ~2=3.333,P=0.068).CT下肢靜脈造影與X線下肢靜脈造影在脛前靜脈、脛後靜脈、腘靜脈與股靜脈顯示能力相同(χ~2=2.095,P=0.148),CT下肢靜脈造影顯示髂靜脈的能力優于X線下肢靜脈造影(χ~2=8.324,P=0.004).結論 CT下肢靜脈造影髂靜脈優于X線下肢靜脈造影;採用延遲50 s經足揹靜脈以2.5 ml/s速度註射45 mgI/ml濃度(非離子型300 mgI/ml對比劑稀釋15%)可穫得較滿意的診斷圖像.
목적 토론다층라선CT직접하지정맥조영증강소묘적대비제주사방식、농도화연지시간,심구교위이상적CT직접하지정맥조영방안.방법 선택하지정맥질병환자32례,채용불동대비제농도여불동주사속솔진행CT직접하지정맥조영검사,병대도상대비분석,22례여X선하지정맥조영진행분절단정맥현시능력대비분석.결과 혈류상관성위영위영향CT하지정맥조영도상질량적주요인소,주사속솔1.5 ml/s화2.5 ml/s조적도상평급차이유통계학의의(χ~2=5.495,P=0.019),희석농도위25%여15%적도상평급차이무통계학의의(χ~2=3.333,P=0.068).CT하지정맥조영여X선하지정맥조영재경전정맥、경후정맥、객정맥여고정맥현시능력상동(χ~2=2.095,P=0.148),CT하지정맥조영현시가정맥적능력우우X선하지정맥조영(χ~2=8.324,P=0.004).결론 CT하지정맥조영가정맥우우X선하지정맥조영;채용연지50 s경족배정맥이2.5 ml/s속도주사45 mgI/ml농도(비리자형300 mgI/ml대비제희석15%)가획득교만의적진단도상.
Objective To discuss the injective method, contrast agent concentration and delay time of MSCT direct venography in lower extremity vein, in order to make optimal venographic schedule. Methods Thirty-two patients with lower extremity vein diseases underwent MSCT direct venography in using different concentration and injective rate of contrast agent, and the images were analyzed. The displaying ability of MSCT direct venography in lower extremity vein segment was compared with that of X-ray venography in 22 patients. Results Blood flow correlation constructed defect was the main factor impacting image quality of CT venography in lower extremity. The image scores between the groups of injective rate 1.5 ml/s and the group of 2.5 ml/s were statistically different (χ~2=5.495, P=0.019), whereas no difference of image score was found between the group of concentration of 25% and 15% (χ~2=3.333, P=0.068). The displaying ability of CT and X-ray venography in anterior tibial vein, posterior tibial vein, popliteal vein and femoral vein was not statistically different (χ~2=2.095, P=0.148). For iliac vein, the displaying ability of CT outstripped that of X-ray venography (χ~2=8.324, P=0.004). Conclusion With the schedule of delay time 50 s, injective rate 2.5 ml/s and concentration 45 mgI/ml (nonionic 300 mgI/ml and diluted 15%), MSCT direct venography in lower extremity can acquire satisfactory image, and its displaying ability of iliac vein is better than that of X-ray venography.