生态学报
生態學報
생태학보
ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA
2009年
12期
6429-6438
,共10页
东海%米氏凯伦藻水华%浮游植物%微型浮游动物%比摄食率%稀释法
東海%米氏凱倫藻水華%浮遊植物%微型浮遊動物%比攝食率%稀釋法
동해%미씨개륜조수화%부유식물%미형부유동물%비섭식솔%희석법
East China Sea%Karenia mikimotoi bloom%phytoplankton%micro-zooplankton%grazing rate%dilution method
2005年4~6月在东海有害水华频发区14个站位采样,通过现场稀释法实验对春季东海水域浮游植物比生长率和微型浮游动物比摄食率进行了研究.结果表明东海有害水华频发区浮游植物群落以甲藻为优势.浮游植物比生长率在水华爆发前相对较低,平均为1.18 d~(-1);进入水华期后比生长率明显升高,但在水华站位随现存量增加而降低;非水华区比生长率近岸高、远岸低.微型浮游动物主要以急游虫和桡足类幼体为主,而种类上以砂壳纤毛虫居多.微型浮游动物比摄食率在水华爆发前波动较大,介于0.53~1.73 d~(-1),平均为0.90 d~(-1);在水华区比摄食率较为稳定,浮游植物比生长率的降低导致群落净生长率持续下降;在非水华区,比摄食率整体较高,近岸低而远岸高.微型浮游动物的摄食对浮游植物群落的生长有一定的控制作用,但在水华爆发后这种控制作用将减弱.
2005年4~6月在東海有害水華頻髮區14箇站位採樣,通過現場稀釋法實驗對春季東海水域浮遊植物比生長率和微型浮遊動物比攝食率進行瞭研究.結果錶明東海有害水華頻髮區浮遊植物群落以甲藻為優勢.浮遊植物比生長率在水華爆髮前相對較低,平均為1.18 d~(-1);進入水華期後比生長率明顯升高,但在水華站位隨現存量增加而降低;非水華區比生長率近岸高、遠岸低.微型浮遊動物主要以急遊蟲和橈足類幼體為主,而種類上以砂殼纖毛蟲居多.微型浮遊動物比攝食率在水華爆髮前波動較大,介于0.53~1.73 d~(-1),平均為0.90 d~(-1);在水華區比攝食率較為穩定,浮遊植物比生長率的降低導緻群落淨生長率持續下降;在非水華區,比攝食率整體較高,近岸低而遠岸高.微型浮遊動物的攝食對浮遊植物群落的生長有一定的控製作用,但在水華爆髮後這種控製作用將減弱.
2005년4~6월재동해유해수화빈발구14개참위채양,통과현장희석법실험대춘계동해수역부유식물비생장솔화미형부유동물비섭식솔진행료연구.결과표명동해유해수화빈발구부유식물군락이갑조위우세.부유식물비생장솔재수화폭발전상대교저,평균위1.18 d~(-1);진입수화기후비생장솔명현승고,단재수화참위수현존량증가이강저;비수화구비생장솔근안고、원안저.미형부유동물주요이급유충화뇨족류유체위주,이충류상이사각섬모충거다.미형부유동물비섭식솔재수화폭발전파동교대,개우0.53~1.73 d~(-1),평균위0.90 d~(-1);재수화구비섭식솔교위은정,부유식물비생장솔적강저도치군락정생장솔지속하강;재비수화구,비섭식솔정체교고,근안저이원안고.미형부유동물적섭식대부유식물군락적생장유일정적공제작용,단재수화폭발후저충공제작용장감약.
From 27~(th) April to 17~(th) June 2005, phytoplankton growth and feeding by microzooplankton were studied in waters frequently subject to harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the East China Sea. Ship-board dilution incubation experiments were carried out at 14 stations to calculate the phytoplankton specific growth rate and the specific rates of grazing by microzooplankton on phytoplankton. Dinoflagellates dominated in the phytoplankton community at typical stations. In the microzooplankton, Strombidium and copepod nauplii were dominant, and tintinnids were important. Phytoplankton specific growth rates, with the average 1.18 d~(-1), were comparatively low before HABs, but increased significantly during the period of frequent HAB occurrence. Phytoplankton specific growth rate showed positive correlation with the standing stock of phytoplankton. The microzooplankton grazing rate ranged from 0.53 d~(-1) to 1.73 d~(-1) before HABs, and converged to 0.90 d~(-1) at HAB stations despite the decreased specific growth rate of phytoplankton. During the HAB period, the microzooplankton grazing rate at non-HAB stations was lower in coastal areas, but higher in the open sea. The results indicate that grazing by microzooplankton is a key process controlling the growth of phytoplankton. The effect, however, appears to have been be weaker in HAB zones.