中国心理卫生杂志
中國心理衛生雜誌
중국심리위생잡지
CHINESE MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL
2010年
2期
89-92
,共4页
韩标%邹义壮%孔晶%崔界峰%李曼颖%马艾丽%韩磊%范宏振%杨甫德
韓標%鄒義壯%孔晶%崔界峰%李曼穎%馬艾麗%韓磊%範宏振%楊甫德
한표%추의장%공정%최계봉%리만영%마애려%한뢰%범굉진%양보덕
综合医院%心理卫生%临床医师%信度%效度%问卷编制
綜閤醫院%心理衛生%臨床醫師%信度%效度%問捲編製
종합의원%심리위생%림상의사%신도%효도%문권편제
general hospital%mental health service%clinician%reliability%validity%psychometrics
目的:了解非精神科临床医师对心理卫生知识的知晓程度,编制适用的调查问卷.方法:方便选取北京市2家三级综合性医院,2家二级综合性医院,1家社区医院的共641名非精神科临床医师进行项目分析、内部一致性检验,并选取其中38例进行间隔2周的重测,以检验重测信度.对作者所在单位三级精神病专科医院的99名医师进行调查,计算其对心理卫生知识的知晓率,并与综合医院样本进行比较.结果:(1)问卷保留46题,包括6个维度,分别为焦虑症状及神经症相关问题、精神分裂症相关问题、抑郁障碍、失眠与心理咨询相关问题、脑器质性障碍、对综合医院心理卫生问题现状的认识.对6维度模型进行验证性因素分析,结果显示卡方与自由度之比小于3,误差项RMSEA与SRMR均<0.08,各种拟合指数除GFI和AGFI外,均>0.90.(2)问卷Cronbach a系数在0.73~0.89之间,重测Pearson相关系数在0.59~0.78之间.(3)综合医院受试对心理卫生知识总的知晓率低于专科医院受试(47.6%vs.90.9%,P<0.001).结论:问卷结构符合编制要求,有较好信效度,能在一定程度上反映客观状况,可在临床中试用.
目的:瞭解非精神科臨床醫師對心理衛生知識的知曉程度,編製適用的調查問捲.方法:方便選取北京市2傢三級綜閤性醫院,2傢二級綜閤性醫院,1傢社區醫院的共641名非精神科臨床醫師進行項目分析、內部一緻性檢驗,併選取其中38例進行間隔2週的重測,以檢驗重測信度.對作者所在單位三級精神病專科醫院的99名醫師進行調查,計算其對心理衛生知識的知曉率,併與綜閤醫院樣本進行比較.結果:(1)問捲保留46題,包括6箇維度,分彆為焦慮癥狀及神經癥相關問題、精神分裂癥相關問題、抑鬱障礙、失眠與心理咨詢相關問題、腦器質性障礙、對綜閤醫院心理衛生問題現狀的認識.對6維度模型進行驗證性因素分析,結果顯示卡方與自由度之比小于3,誤差項RMSEA與SRMR均<0.08,各種擬閤指數除GFI和AGFI外,均>0.90.(2)問捲Cronbach a繫數在0.73~0.89之間,重測Pearson相關繫數在0.59~0.78之間.(3)綜閤醫院受試對心理衛生知識總的知曉率低于專科醫院受試(47.6%vs.90.9%,P<0.001).結論:問捲結構符閤編製要求,有較好信效度,能在一定程度上反映客觀狀況,可在臨床中試用.
목적:료해비정신과림상의사대심리위생지식적지효정도,편제괄용적조사문권.방법:방편선취북경시2가삼급종합성의원,2가이급종합성의원,1가사구의원적공641명비정신과림상의사진행항목분석、내부일치성검험,병선취기중38례진행간격2주적중측,이검험중측신도.대작자소재단위삼급정신병전과의원적99명의사진행조사,계산기대심리위생지식적지효솔,병여종합의원양본진행비교.결과:(1)문권보류46제,포괄6개유도,분별위초필증상급신경증상관문제、정신분렬증상관문제、억욱장애、실면여심리자순상관문제、뇌기질성장애、대종합의원심리위생문제현상적인식.대6유도모형진행험증성인소분석,결과현시잡방여자유도지비소우3,오차항RMSEA여SRMR균<0.08,각충의합지수제GFI화AGFI외,균>0.90.(2)문권Cronbach a계수재0.73~0.89지간,중측Pearson상관계수재0.59~0.78지간.(3)종합의원수시대심리위생지식총적지효솔저우전과의원수시(47.6%vs.90.9%,P<0.001).결론:문권결구부합편제요구,유교호신효도,능재일정정도상반영객관상황,가재림상중시용.
Objective: To develop the mental health knowledge questionnaire in order to know about the awareness of mental health knowledge in non-psychiatric clinicians. Methods: A sample of the 641 non-psychiatric clinicians from 2 tertiary general hospitals, 2 second-class general hospitals, and 1 community hospital were used for item analysis and internal consistency test; 38 cases were selected for the re-test interval of 2 weeks to test the test-retest reliability. And totally 99 psychiatrists finished the survey as controls. The awareness rates between the non-psychiatric and psychliatric clinicians were compared. Results: The questionnaire included 46 items and consis-ted of 6 subscales, involving anxiety, schizophrenia, depression, dyssomnia and psychological counseling, or-ganic brain disorder, and recognition for mental health service situation in general hospital The results of confirma-tory factor analysis showed that the ratio of chi-square and degree of freedom was below 3. The fitting indexes except GFI and AGFI were more than 0.90. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.89, and test-retest Pearson correlation coefficient of reliabifity ranged from 0.59 to 0.78. Awareness rate was 47.6% in general hospital and 90.9% in psychiatric hospitals. Conclusion: The mental health knowledge questionnaire has good psychometric properties and may be applied in clinical studies.