中国实用眼科杂志
中國實用眼科雜誌
중국실용안과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2009年
6期
602-605
,共4页
朱剑琴%张玲%马忠旭%刘汝瑜
硃劍琴%張玲%馬忠旭%劉汝瑜
주검금%장령%마충욱%류여유
白内障%人工晶状体%蓝光滤过型%对比敏感度
白內障%人工晶狀體%藍光濾過型%對比敏感度
백내장%인공정상체%람광려과형%대비민감도
Cataract%Intraocular lens%Blue-light filtering%Contrast sensitivity
目的 比较研究白内障超声乳化植入蓝光滤过型人工晶状体和普通一片式人工晶状体的临床效果.方法 选取行白内障超声乳化摘除联合人工晶状体植入患者60例,60只眼,术后裸眼视力大于等于0.8.根据植入人工晶状体的类型不同,分为试验组和对照组,试验组植入YA-60BB人工晶状体组,30只眼;对照组植入AR40e人工晶状体组,30只眼.术后一个月检查患者的对比敏感度、畏光蓝视和色觉等主观视觉症状.结果 (1)YA-60BB人工晶状体组对比敏感度和AR40e人工晶状体组相比,术后一个月昼眩光状态1.5cpd空间频率下,和夜眩光状态1.5、3cpd空间频率下,两组对比敏感度相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),蓝光滤过组明显高于非蓝光滤过组.其余状态下,两组相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05).(2)术后一个月两组间畏光症状相比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05).两种晶体间色觉相比也无明显差异.蓝视症状相比,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),蓝光滤过组的术后蓝视症状明显少于非蓝光滤过组.结论 植入YA-60BB人工晶状体可提高眩光状态下低空间频率下的对比敏感度,也可以减轻患者术后的蓝视症状,而对色觉无负面的影响.
目的 比較研究白內障超聲乳化植入藍光濾過型人工晶狀體和普通一片式人工晶狀體的臨床效果.方法 選取行白內障超聲乳化摘除聯閤人工晶狀體植入患者60例,60隻眼,術後裸眼視力大于等于0.8.根據植入人工晶狀體的類型不同,分為試驗組和對照組,試驗組植入YA-60BB人工晶狀體組,30隻眼;對照組植入AR40e人工晶狀體組,30隻眼.術後一箇月檢查患者的對比敏感度、畏光藍視和色覺等主觀視覺癥狀.結果 (1)YA-60BB人工晶狀體組對比敏感度和AR40e人工晶狀體組相比,術後一箇月晝眩光狀態1.5cpd空間頻率下,和夜眩光狀態1.5、3cpd空間頻率下,兩組對比敏感度相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),藍光濾過組明顯高于非藍光濾過組.其餘狀態下,兩組相比差異無統計學意義(P0.05).(2)術後一箇月兩組間畏光癥狀相比,差異無統計學意義(P0.05).兩種晶體間色覺相比也無明顯差異.藍視癥狀相比,兩組間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),藍光濾過組的術後藍視癥狀明顯少于非藍光濾過組.結論 植入YA-60BB人工晶狀體可提高眩光狀態下低空間頻率下的對比敏感度,也可以減輕患者術後的藍視癥狀,而對色覺無負麵的影響.
목적 비교연구백내장초성유화식입람광려과형인공정상체화보통일편식인공정상체적림상효과.방법 선취행백내장초성유화적제연합인공정상체식입환자60례,60지안,술후라안시력대우등우0.8.근거식입인공정상체적류형불동,분위시험조화대조조,시험조식입YA-60BB인공정상체조,30지안;대조조식입AR40e인공정상체조,30지안.술후일개월검사환자적대비민감도、외광람시화색각등주관시각증상.결과 (1)YA-60BB인공정상체조대비민감도화AR40e인공정상체조상비,술후일개월주현광상태1.5cpd공간빈솔하,화야현광상태1.5、3cpd공간빈솔하,량조대비민감도상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),람광려과조명현고우비람광려과조.기여상태하,량조상비차이무통계학의의(P0.05).(2)술후일개월량조간외광증상상비,차이무통계학의의(P0.05).량충정체간색각상비야무명현차이.람시증상상비,량조간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),람광려과조적술후람시증상명현소우비람광려과조.결론 식입YA-60BB인공정상체가제고현광상태하저공간빈솔하적대비민감도,야가이감경환자술후적람시증상,이대색각무부면적영향.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of the phacoemulsifieation operation combined with blue-light filtering YA-60BB intraocular lens implantation or Sensar AR40e implantation in the elders.Methods Sixty eyes were undergone phacoemulsifieation with IOL implantation. Uncorrected post-operative visual acuity was equal to or greater than 0.8. Based on the different type of IOL they were divided into 2 groups.Thirty eyes were implanted with blue-light filtering YA-60BB IOL while other 30 cases were implanted with Sen-sar AR40e IOL. The post-operative visual symptoms of the contrast sensitivity, photophobia, blue opsia and color perception were observed 1 month after operation Results The contrast sensitivity of the patients with the blue-light filtering IOL was superior to that with the conventional IOL under the condition of glare and 1.5c/d, 3c/d space frequency. There were no significant differences in photophobia and color perception performance between two groups 1 month after operation. While the blue-light filtering IOL can significantly relieve the post-operative blue opsia symptom compared with the conventional IOt,. Conclusion The blue-light filtering IOL improved contrast sensitivity under the condition of glare and low space frequency compared with the conventional IOL. It relieved the post-operative blue opsia symptom,however it did not modify color perception performance.