中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2009年
7期
1170-1171
,共2页
宫颈糜烂%微波%复方莪术油栓
宮頸糜爛%微波%複方莪術油栓
궁경미란%미파%복방아술유전
cervical erosion%microwave therapy%compounded zedoary turmeric oil suppository
目的 观察微波联合复方莪术油栓治疗宫颈糜烂的效果.方法 回顾性分析341例宫颈糜烂患者的临床资料,对照组149例予单纯微波治疗,观察组192例微波术后联合复方莪术油栓.比较两组的治愈率、显效率和无效率.结果 轻度糜烂者治愈率、显效率和无效率观察组分别为87.8%、12.2%、0,对照组分别为85.7%、14.3%、0,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).中度糜烂者观察组分别为86.1%、12.8%、1.2%,对照组分别为60.9%、31.9%、7.2%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).重度糜烂者观察组分别59.4%、34.4%、6.2%,对照组分别为29.2%、41.7%、29.2%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 轻度糜烂者单纯微波治疗即可,中重度糜烂者微波联合复方莪术油栓临床效果优于单纯微波治疗.
目的 觀察微波聯閤複方莪術油栓治療宮頸糜爛的效果.方法 迴顧性分析341例宮頸糜爛患者的臨床資料,對照組149例予單純微波治療,觀察組192例微波術後聯閤複方莪術油栓.比較兩組的治愈率、顯效率和無效率.結果 輕度糜爛者治愈率、顯效率和無效率觀察組分彆為87.8%、12.2%、0,對照組分彆為85.7%、14.3%、0,兩組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).中度糜爛者觀察組分彆為86.1%、12.8%、1.2%,對照組分彆為60.9%、31.9%、7.2%,兩組差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).重度糜爛者觀察組分彆59.4%、34.4%、6.2%,對照組分彆為29.2%、41.7%、29.2%,兩組差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 輕度糜爛者單純微波治療即可,中重度糜爛者微波聯閤複方莪術油栓臨床效果優于單純微波治療.
목적 관찰미파연합복방아술유전치료궁경미란적효과.방법 회고성분석341례궁경미란환자적림상자료,대조조149례여단순미파치료,관찰조192례미파술후연합복방아술유전.비교량조적치유솔、현효솔화무효솔.결과 경도미란자치유솔、현효솔화무효솔관찰조분별위87.8%、12.2%、0,대조조분별위85.7%、14.3%、0,량조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).중도미란자관찰조분별위86.1%、12.8%、1.2%,대조조분별위60.9%、31.9%、7.2%,량조차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).중도미란자관찰조분별59.4%、34.4%、6.2%,대조조분별위29.2%、41.7%、29.2%,량조차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 경도미란자단순미파치료즉가,중중도미란자미파연합복방아술유전림상효과우우단순미파치료.
Objective To observe therapeutic effects of compounded zedoary turmeric oil suppository com-bined with microwave therapy on cervical erosion. Methods Women with cervical erosion were randomly divided in-to two groups: single microwave therapy group (control group) and compounded zedoary turmeric oil suppository com-bined with microwave therapy group (observation group). The chnical cure rate, obvious effective rate and ineffective rate were compared between two groups. Results In mild erosion, the clinical cure rate, obvious effective rate and ineffective rate were 87.8%, 12.2% ,0 respectively in the observation group. In tbe control group were 85.7%, 14.3%,0 respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (P >0.05); In moderate erosion, were 86.1%, 12.8%, 1.2% respectively in the observation group; were 60.9%, 31.9%, 7.2% respectively in the control group and there was significant difference between them (P < 0.01); In severe erosion, were 59.4%, 34.4%, 6.2% respectively in the observation group; were 29.17%, 41.7%, 29.2% respectively in the control group, and there was significant difference between them (P < 0.05). Conclusion Single microwave therapy to the mild erosion was suf-ficient; nevertheless, compounded zedoary turmeric oil suppository combined with microwave therapy to moderate and severe erosion was better than single microwave therapy.
