中华外科杂志
中華外科雜誌
중화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2009年
19期
1499-1502
,共1页
胡森%车晋伟%杜颖%田易军%柴家科%盛志勇
鬍森%車晉偉%杜穎%田易軍%柴傢科%盛誌勇
호삼%차진위%두영%전역군%시가과%성지용
烧伤%休克%补液疗法%血液动力学过程%组织灌流
燒傷%休剋%補液療法%血液動力學過程%組織灌流
소상%휴극%보액요법%혈액동역학과정%조직관류
Burns%Shock%Fluid therapy%Hemodynamic processes%Tissue perfusion
目的 研究早期口服补液对犬50%总体表面积(TBSA)烧伤休克期血流动力学和组织灌流的影响.方法 成年雄性Beagle犬18只,先期无菌手术行颈总动脉、颈外静脉、胃、空肠及膀胱置管,24 h后用凝固汽油燃烧法造成其颈、背和胸、腹部约50%TBSA Ⅲ.烧伤.随机分为不补液(NR)、口服补液(OR)和静脉补液(IR)三组,每组6只.伤后第1个24 h NR组无治疗,OR和IR组于伤后30 min开始按Parkland公式分别从胃管和静脉输注葡萄糖.电解质溶液,伤后24 h起各组犬均实施静脉补液.测定犬伤前(0 h)和伤后2、4、8、24、48和72 h非麻醉状态下的平均动脉压(MAP)、全身血管阻力(SVR)、心输出量(CO)、左室内压最大变化速率(dp/dtmax)、尿量以及胃黏膜CO2分压(PgCO2)和小肠黏膜血流量(IMBF),并记录伤后72 h死亡率.结果 与伤前相比,各组犬MAP、CO、dp/dtmax,、IMBF和尿量在伤后2 h均大幅降低(P<0.01),而SVR和PgCO2显著升高.两补液组上述指标伤后8 h开始恢复,72 h IR组除IMBF外均恢复至伤前水平,但OR组CO、SVR及胃肠组织灌流指标仍差于伤前水平(P<0.01).NR组上述指标持续恶化,伤后24 h内无尿并全部死亡.OR组血液动力学和内脏组织灌流指标显著优于NR组,但差于IR组.伤后72 h死亡率NR组为6/6、OR组3/6,而IR组为0/6.结论 50%TBSA烧伤后早期口服葡萄糖-电解质溶液复苏效果虽差于静脉补液,但相比不补液,能显著改善血流动力学指标和内脏组织灌流,减少早期死亡,有潜力成为战争或灾害时静脉液体复苏的替代方法.
目的 研究早期口服補液對犬50%總體錶麵積(TBSA)燒傷休剋期血流動力學和組織灌流的影響.方法 成年雄性Beagle犬18隻,先期無菌手術行頸總動脈、頸外靜脈、胃、空腸及膀胱置管,24 h後用凝固汽油燃燒法造成其頸、揹和胸、腹部約50%TBSA Ⅲ.燒傷.隨機分為不補液(NR)、口服補液(OR)和靜脈補液(IR)三組,每組6隻.傷後第1箇24 h NR組無治療,OR和IR組于傷後30 min開始按Parkland公式分彆從胃管和靜脈輸註葡萄糖.電解質溶液,傷後24 h起各組犬均實施靜脈補液.測定犬傷前(0 h)和傷後2、4、8、24、48和72 h非痳醉狀態下的平均動脈壓(MAP)、全身血管阻力(SVR)、心輸齣量(CO)、左室內壓最大變化速率(dp/dtmax)、尿量以及胃黏膜CO2分壓(PgCO2)和小腸黏膜血流量(IMBF),併記錄傷後72 h死亡率.結果 與傷前相比,各組犬MAP、CO、dp/dtmax,、IMBF和尿量在傷後2 h均大幅降低(P<0.01),而SVR和PgCO2顯著升高.兩補液組上述指標傷後8 h開始恢複,72 h IR組除IMBF外均恢複至傷前水平,但OR組CO、SVR及胃腸組織灌流指標仍差于傷前水平(P<0.01).NR組上述指標持續噁化,傷後24 h內無尿併全部死亡.OR組血液動力學和內髒組織灌流指標顯著優于NR組,但差于IR組.傷後72 h死亡率NR組為6/6、OR組3/6,而IR組為0/6.結論 50%TBSA燒傷後早期口服葡萄糖-電解質溶液複囌效果雖差于靜脈補液,但相比不補液,能顯著改善血流動力學指標和內髒組織灌流,減少早期死亡,有潛力成為戰爭或災害時靜脈液體複囌的替代方法.
목적 연구조기구복보액대견50%총체표면적(TBSA)소상휴극기혈류동역학화조직관류적영향.방법 성년웅성Beagle견18지,선기무균수술행경총동맥、경외정맥、위、공장급방광치관,24 h후용응고기유연소법조성기경、배화흉、복부약50%TBSA Ⅲ.소상.수궤분위불보액(NR)、구복보액(OR)화정맥보액(IR)삼조,매조6지.상후제1개24 h NR조무치료,OR화IR조우상후30 min개시안Parkland공식분별종위관화정맥수주포도당.전해질용액,상후24 h기각조견균실시정맥보액.측정견상전(0 h)화상후2、4、8、24、48화72 h비마취상태하적평균동맥압(MAP)、전신혈관조력(SVR)、심수출량(CO)、좌실내압최대변화속솔(dp/dtmax)、뇨량이급위점막CO2분압(PgCO2)화소장점막혈류량(IMBF),병기록상후72 h사망솔.결과 여상전상비,각조견MAP、CO、dp/dtmax,、IMBF화뇨량재상후2 h균대폭강저(P<0.01),이SVR화PgCO2현저승고.량보액조상술지표상후8 h개시회복,72 h IR조제IMBF외균회복지상전수평,단OR조CO、SVR급위장조직관류지표잉차우상전수평(P<0.01).NR조상술지표지속악화,상후24 h내무뇨병전부사망.OR조혈액동역학화내장조직관류지표현저우우NR조,단차우IR조.상후72 h사망솔NR조위6/6、OR조3/6,이IR조위0/6.결론 50%TBSA소상후조기구복포도당-전해질용액복소효과수차우정맥보액,단상비불보액,능현저개선혈류동역학지표화내장조직관류,감소조기사망,유잠력성위전쟁혹재해시정맥액체복소적체대방법.
Objective To investigate the effect of early oral fluid resuscitation on hemedynamic and tissue perfusion in dogs with severe bum shock. Methods Eighteen male Beagle dogs with intubation of carotid artery, jugular vein, stomach, jejunum and bladder for 24 h were subjected to a 50% TBSA full-thickness burn, then were equally divided into non fluid resuscitation (NR), oral resuscitation (OR) and intravenous resusoitation(IR) groups, (each n=6). Dogs in IR and OR groups were given glucose-electrolyte solution (GES) by gastric tube or intravenous infusion according to Parkland formula within 24 h after burn, while those in NR group were not given any treatment. Dogs in each group were given intravenous fluid resuscitation from 24 h after burn. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), dp/dt max of left ventricular contractility (dp/dtmax), gastric carbon dioxide pressure(PgCO_2), intestinal mucosal blood flow(IMBF), and urinary output were determined before burn (0 h)and 2,4,8,24,48 and 72 h after burn at no anaesthesia state. Mortality rate of 72 h after burn was also recorded. Results MAP, CO, dp/dtmax, IMBF greatly decreased, and SVR and PgCO_2 obviously increased from 2 h after burn in each group (P<0.01). The measurements except IMBF of IR group returned to pre-injury levels at 72 h after burn, while CO, SVR, PgCO_2 and IMBF of OR group still worse compared with 0 h(P<0.01). All measurements of NR group kept on worsen, and died with anuria within 24 h after burn. Parameters of hemodynamic and tissue perfusion of OR group were significantly superior to those of NR group, but it inferior to those of IR group. At 72 h after burn, 6 (6/6) survived in IR group, 3 (3/6) in OR group and 0 (0/6) in NR group. Conclusions Although oral resuscitation with GES is not as efficient as intravenous resuscitation in a 50% TBSA burn injury, it still can promote hemodynamie, improve the tissue perfusion and reduce the mortality comparing to no resuscitation. Oral resuscitation might be an ideal alternative way of intravenous resuscitation, especially in wars or other site of mass casualties.