中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2012年
1期
56-58
,共3页
医学科技论文%多中心研究%合作研究%科研水平
醫學科技論文%多中心研究%閤作研究%科研水平
의학과기논문%다중심연구%합작연구%과연수평
Medical science-technique paper%Multi-center study%Cooperative study%Scientific research level
目的 分析国内外医学科研多中心合作研究的现状,以提高科研水平.方法 采用文献计量学方法,对2010年出版的国内、国外10种期刊发表的200篇原始研究论文的合著作者数、研究机构、国家、基金论文数和大样本论文等指标进行分析.结果 国内112篇原始研究论文中,篇均作者数为(6.1±1.1)位,≥3个研究机构论文占15.2％,≥2个研究国家的论文占2.7％；基金论文为49篇,占43.8％,其中≥3个基金的论文占10.7％；大样本论文占24.1％.国外88篇原始研究论文中,篇均作者数为(9.8±2.7)位,其中≥3个研究机构论文占86.4％,≥2个国家的论文占44.3％；基金论文占69.3％；大样本论文占50％.比较国内、国外论文篇均作者数、≥3个研究机构、≥2个国家、大样本论文及≥3个基金论文所占比例,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),但国内、国外基金论文数比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 国内、国外医学多中心合作研究情况存在差异,提示应加强国内外及国内多中心合作研究,以提高科研水平,减少资源浪费.
目的 分析國內外醫學科研多中心閤作研究的現狀,以提高科研水平.方法 採用文獻計量學方法,對2010年齣版的國內、國外10種期刊髮錶的200篇原始研究論文的閤著作者數、研究機構、國傢、基金論文數和大樣本論文等指標進行分析.結果 國內112篇原始研究論文中,篇均作者數為(6.1±1.1)位,≥3箇研究機構論文佔15.2％,≥2箇研究國傢的論文佔2.7％；基金論文為49篇,佔43.8％,其中≥3箇基金的論文佔10.7％；大樣本論文佔24.1％.國外88篇原始研究論文中,篇均作者數為(9.8±2.7)位,其中≥3箇研究機構論文佔86.4％,≥2箇國傢的論文佔44.3％；基金論文佔69.3％；大樣本論文佔50％.比較國內、國外論文篇均作者數、≥3箇研究機構、≥2箇國傢、大樣本論文及≥3箇基金論文所佔比例,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05),但國內、國外基金論文數比較,差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).結論 國內、國外醫學多中心閤作研究情況存在差異,提示應加彊國內外及國內多中心閤作研究,以提高科研水平,減少資源浪費.
목적 분석국내외의학과연다중심합작연구적현상,이제고과연수평.방법 채용문헌계량학방법,대2010년출판적국내、국외10충기간발표적200편원시연구논문적합저작자수、연구궤구、국가、기금논문수화대양본논문등지표진행분석.결과 국내112편원시연구논문중,편균작자수위(6.1±1.1)위,≥3개연구궤구논문점15.2％,≥2개연구국가적논문점2.7％；기금논문위49편,점43.8％,기중≥3개기금적논문점10.7％；대양본논문점24.1％.국외88편원시연구논문중,편균작자수위(9.8±2.7)위,기중≥3개연구궤구논문점86.4％,≥2개국가적논문점44.3％；기금논문점69.3％；대양본논문점50％.비교국내、국외논문편균작자수、≥3개연구궤구、≥2개국가、대양본논문급≥3개기금논문소점비례,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05),단국내、국외기금논문수비교,차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).결론 국내、국외의학다중심합작연구정황존재차이,제시응가강국내외급국내다중심합작연구,이제고과연수평,감소자원낭비.
Objective To analyze the current situation of domestic multi-center study of medicine research in order to improve the scientific research level.Method Using the bibliometrics method to analyze the number of coauthors,research institutions, research states distribution,foundation paper numbers and large sample papers of 200 multicenter original research papers published in 10 domestic and foreign journals in 2010.Results There were 112 domestic original research papers,the number of average coauthor was 6.1± 1.1; 15.2％ of them were more than 3research institutions; 2.7％ of them were cooperative study of more than 2 countries.49 papers (43.8％)were supported by fund; 10.7％ of which were more than 3 foundations; large sample papers account for 24.1 ％.In 88 foreign original research papers,the number of average coauthors is 9.8± 2.7; 86.4％ of them are under more than 3 research institutions; 44.3％ of them are cooperative study of more than 2 countries.Fund papers account for 69.3 ％ ; large sample papers account for 50％.There were significant difference in the number of coauthors,research institutions,number of countries,large sample papers and the number of ≥3 foundation papers between both domestic and international paper(P ＜ 0.05).The number of domestic and foreign funded papers had no significant difference (P ＞0.05).Conclusion There are some differences between domestic and foreign medical cooperative research. We should strengthen the international and domestic cooperative research in order to improve the scientific research level and reduce the waste of resources.
