CAJ | 학술논문

不起诉制度符合诉讼经济的现代司法理念,因此受到很多国家青睐。在我国,由于起诉阶段控诉、辩护、裁判三方构造的缺失,使得不起诉权成为检察机关的一种＂终局裁判＂权力。为了保障利害关系人的合法权益,有必要在检察委员会讨论决定不起诉案件前,引入公开听证程序,正式听取涉案各方的证据意见,确保检察委员会在充分证据意见前提下作出正确决定。这既是检务公开的具体表现,也是司法民主的必然要求。
불기소제도부합소송경제적현대사법이념,인차수도흔다국가청래。재아국,유우기소계단공소、변호、재판삼방구조적결실,사득불기소권성위검찰궤관적일충＂종국재판＂권력。위료보장리해관계인적합법권익,유필요재검찰위원회토론결정불기소안건전,인입공개은증정서,정식은취섭안각방적증거의견,학보검찰위원회재충분증거의견전제하작출정학결정。저기시검무공개적구체표현,야시사법민주적필연요구。
The system of non-prosecution conforms to the modern judicial concept of the litigation economy,so it is widely favored by many countries.In China,due to the deficiency of tripartite structure in the prosecution phase of the complaint,defense and judge,abandoning prosecution becomes a ＂final decision＂ power for public attorney.In order to protect the legitimate interests of stakeholders,it is necessary to introduce the public hearing procedure to listen to views of all parties involved before the committee of public attorney to discuss the unprosecutive cases to ensure correct formal decision based on sufficient evidence.