CAJ | 학술논문

目的报道OCM入路微创全髋关节置换术的初步临床应用结果,及其与双切口入路的疗效比较.方法本研究分两组,OCM入路组20例,双切口入路组21例.记录术中、术后的出血量、手术时间,术后开始下床活动的时间、弃拐时间和术后3月Harris评分等.结果术中、术后出血量OCM入路组较少,但无显著性差异.手术时间、术后开始下床活动时间、患腿单足站立时间、弃拐时间OCM入路组明显缩短,但术后3月Harris评分并无明显差异.结论微创全髋关节置换OCM入路组的近期术后疗效明显.
목적 보도OCM입로미창전관관절치환술적초보림상응용결과,급기여쌍절구입로적료효비교.방법 본연구분량조,OCM입로조20례,쌍절구입로조21례.기록술중、술후적출혈량、수술시간,술후개시하상활동적시간、기괴시간화술후3월Harris평분등.결과 술중、술후출혈량OCM입로조교소,단무현저성차이.수술시간、술후개시하상활동시간、환퇴단족참립시간、기괴시간OCM입로조명현축단,단술후3월Harris평분병무명현차이.결론 미창전관관절치환OCM입로조적근기술후료효명현.
Objective To report the early results of the preliminary clinical result of minimally invasive OCM approach with two-incision Total Hip Arthroplasty.Methods Two groups were included in this study.One group comprised 20 cases with the OCM approach while the other had 21 cases of the minimally-invasive two-incision approach.The intra-and post-operative bleeding volume,the time toleave bed and the time to walk without crutches were recorded.Results The intra-and postoperative bleeding volume was less in the OCM approach group than in the standard approach group,but there was no significant difference between them.The time of operation,intra-and postoperative bleeding volume in OCM approach group was significant less.The patients in the OCM approach group seem to leave the bed earlier,walk independently earlier ssignificantly.Conclusion The short-term result of the OCM approach group is better than that of the minimally invasive two-incision group.