第四军医大学学报
第四軍醫大學學報
제사군의대학학보
JOURNAL OF THE FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2001年
7期
638-641
,共4页
黄久仪%阎明晓%徐德忠%李良寿%贾国良%李兰荪%石丘玲
黃久儀%閻明曉%徐德忠%李良壽%賈國良%李蘭蓀%石丘玲
황구의%염명효%서덕충%리량수%가국량%리란손%석구령
冠心病%危险因素%血脂%病例对照研究
冠心病%危險因素%血脂%病例對照研究
관심병%위험인소%혈지%병례대조연구
目的 探讨血脂水平与冠心病发病的关系. 方法 选择住院确诊的冠心病患者84例为病例组,排除冠心病的住院患者或健康体检者163例为对照组,对两组的血脂水平、脂蛋白(a)的均数进行比较,并用单因素和多因素分析计算危险因素的优势比(OR)及OR95%可信限(95%CI). 结果 病例组的总胆固醇、三酰甘油、高密度 脂蛋白水平分别为4.13,1.79和1.16 mmolAL-1,脂蛋白(a)为0.38 g.L-1,而对 照组血脂三项为3.82,1.44和1.34 mmolAL-1,脂蛋白(a)为0.16 gAL-1,两组间均有显著的 统计 学差异(P<0.05); 单因素分析显示: 上述4项指标的OR值分别为3.03, 2.42,3.76 和0.21. 多因素分析结果显示: 被筛选进入Logistic回归方程的变量分别为高密度脂蛋白、脂蛋白(a)、胆固醇水平和每日吸烟量. 结论 吸烟和脂代谢紊乱是我国冠心病患者的主 要危险因素,我国的胆固醇水平以国际统一标准作为正常值界限,标准过高. 这些线索将为我国冠心病危险因素的深入研究和冠心病防治策略的制定提供必要的参考依据.
目的 探討血脂水平與冠心病髮病的關繫. 方法 選擇住院確診的冠心病患者84例為病例組,排除冠心病的住院患者或健康體檢者163例為對照組,對兩組的血脂水平、脂蛋白(a)的均數進行比較,併用單因素和多因素分析計算危險因素的優勢比(OR)及OR95%可信限(95%CI). 結果 病例組的總膽固醇、三酰甘油、高密度 脂蛋白水平分彆為4.13,1.79和1.16 mmolAL-1,脂蛋白(a)為0.38 g.L-1,而對 照組血脂三項為3.82,1.44和1.34 mmolAL-1,脂蛋白(a)為0.16 gAL-1,兩組間均有顯著的 統計 學差異(P<0.05); 單因素分析顯示: 上述4項指標的OR值分彆為3.03, 2.42,3.76 和0.21. 多因素分析結果顯示: 被篩選進入Logistic迴歸方程的變量分彆為高密度脂蛋白、脂蛋白(a)、膽固醇水平和每日吸煙量. 結論 吸煙和脂代謝紊亂是我國冠心病患者的主 要危險因素,我國的膽固醇水平以國際統一標準作為正常值界限,標準過高. 這些線索將為我國冠心病危險因素的深入研究和冠心病防治策略的製定提供必要的參攷依據.
목적 탐토혈지수평여관심병발병적관계. 방법 선택주원학진적관심병환자84례위병례조,배제관심병적주원환자혹건강체검자163례위대조조,대량조적혈지수평、지단백(a)적균수진행비교,병용단인소화다인소분석계산위험인소적우세비(OR)급OR95%가신한(95%CI). 결과 병례조적총담고순、삼선감유、고밀도 지단백수평분별위4.13,1.79화1.16 mmolAL-1,지단백(a)위0.38 g.L-1,이대 조조혈지삼항위3.82,1.44화1.34 mmolAL-1,지단백(a)위0.16 gAL-1,량조간균유현저적 통계 학차이(P<0.05); 단인소분석현시: 상술4항지표적OR치분별위3.03, 2.42,3.76 화0.21. 다인소분석결과현시: 피사선진입Logistic회귀방정적변량분별위고밀도지단백、지단백(a)、담고순수평화매일흡연량. 결론 흡연화지대사문란시아국관심병환자적주 요위험인소,아국적담고순수평이국제통일표준작위정상치계한,표준과고. 저사선색장위아국관심병위험인소적심입연구화관심병방치책략적제정제공필요적삼고의거.
AIM To investigate the relationship between serum lipoprotein and coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS 84 CHD inpatients were selected as c ase group and 163 non-CHD persons from inpatients or healthy population were defined as control group. Se rum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL-c) and Lipop rotein (a) (Lp (a)) were measured. RESULTS Means of TC, TG, HDL-c and Lp (a) in ca s es were 4.13 mmol*L-1, 1.79 mmol*L-1, 1.16 mmol*L-1 and 0.3 8 g*L-1 respectively, while means of those variable in controls were 3.82 mmol*L-1, 1.44 mmol*L-1, 1.34 mmol*L-1 a nd 0.16 g*L-1. Differences between two groups were significan (P<0.05). Uni-variable analysis indic ated that elevation of TG, TC and Lp (a) and decrease of HDL-c were significan tly related to risk of CHD with Odds Ratio (OR) of 3.03, 2.42, 3.76 and 0.21 respectively. Multi-variable analy sis showed that HDL-c, TC, Lp (a) and consumption of cigarettes per-day were the variables bei ng selected in Logistic equation. CONCLUSION Dislipidemia and cigarette smokin g might be the major risk factors of coronary heart disease in China and in terms of TC disputed boundary, the international standard is too high for Chinese.