中华围产医学杂志
中華圍產醫學雜誌
중화위산의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
2011年
11期
648-652
,共5页
郑明明%胡娅莉%张书敏%凌静娴%王志群
鄭明明%鬍婭莉%張書敏%凌靜嫻%王誌群
정명명%호아리%장서민%릉정한%왕지군
官颈成熟%引产%地诺前列酮%随机对照试验
官頸成熟%引產%地諾前列酮%隨機對照試驗
관경성숙%인산%지낙전렬동%수궤대조시험
Cervical ripening%Labor%induced%Dinoprostone%Randomized controlled trial
目的 比较Foley尿管水囊与普贝生栓促宫颈成熟用于足月妊娠引产的安全性和有效性. 方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,选择2009年6月至12月在本院待产的孕足月、单胎头位、有引产指征、阴道清洁度≤Ⅱ度、胎膜完整、官颈Bishop评分<6分的初产妇,签署随机对照研究知情同意书后,随机分为2组,最终纳入分析的共126例,分别予Foley尿管水囊(64例)和普贝生栓(62例)促官颈成熟,Foley尿管水囊组与普贝生栓组孕妇的孕周、引产前宫颈评分、引产指征差异无统计学意义.采用t、x2检验或Fisher精确概率法比较2组孕妇的引产成功率、分娩方式、产程时间及母儿结局. 结果 Foley尿管水囊组与普贝生栓组宫颈评分改善、引产成功率、阴道分娩率、总产程、产后出血量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).Foley尿管水囊组较普贝生栓组引产24 h内阴道分娩率低[28.1%(18/64)与56.5%(35/62),t=10.37,P<0.05],宫缩过频过强发生率也较低[0.0%(0/64)与17.7%(11/62),P<0.05],但缩宫素使用率高[87.5%(56/64)与21.0%(13/62),x2 =56.27,P<0.05].2组新生儿Apgar评分、羊水胎粪污染发生率、新生儿体重差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).2组孕妇无一例发生产褥感染. 结论 严格掌握Foley尿管水囊促宫颈成熟的指征及执行无菌操作规程,可以取得与普贝生栓相似的促官颈成熟效果及引产母婴结局,未发生过频过强官缩,具有安全性高及成本低廉等优点.
目的 比較Foley尿管水囊與普貝生栓促宮頸成熟用于足月妊娠引產的安全性和有效性. 方法 採用前瞻性隨機對照研究方法,選擇2009年6月至12月在本院待產的孕足月、單胎頭位、有引產指徵、陰道清潔度≤Ⅱ度、胎膜完整、官頸Bishop評分<6分的初產婦,籤署隨機對照研究知情同意書後,隨機分為2組,最終納入分析的共126例,分彆予Foley尿管水囊(64例)和普貝生栓(62例)促官頸成熟,Foley尿管水囊組與普貝生栓組孕婦的孕週、引產前宮頸評分、引產指徵差異無統計學意義.採用t、x2檢驗或Fisher精確概率法比較2組孕婦的引產成功率、分娩方式、產程時間及母兒結跼. 結果 Foley尿管水囊組與普貝生栓組宮頸評分改善、引產成功率、陰道分娩率、總產程、產後齣血量差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).Foley尿管水囊組較普貝生栓組引產24 h內陰道分娩率低[28.1%(18/64)與56.5%(35/62),t=10.37,P<0.05],宮縮過頻過彊髮生率也較低[0.0%(0/64)與17.7%(11/62),P<0.05],但縮宮素使用率高[87.5%(56/64)與21.0%(13/62),x2 =56.27,P<0.05].2組新生兒Apgar評分、羊水胎糞汙染髮生率、新生兒體重差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).2組孕婦無一例髮生產褥感染. 結論 嚴格掌握Foley尿管水囊促宮頸成熟的指徵及執行無菌操作規程,可以取得與普貝生栓相似的促官頸成熟效果及引產母嬰結跼,未髮生過頻過彊官縮,具有安全性高及成本低廉等優點.
목적 비교Foley뇨관수낭여보패생전촉궁경성숙용우족월임신인산적안전성화유효성. 방법 채용전첨성수궤대조연구방법,선택2009년6월지12월재본원대산적잉족월、단태두위、유인산지정、음도청길도≤Ⅱ도、태막완정、관경Bishop평분<6분적초산부,첨서수궤대조연구지정동의서후,수궤분위2조,최종납입분석적공126례,분별여Foley뇨관수낭(64례)화보패생전(62례)촉관경성숙,Foley뇨관수낭조여보패생전조잉부적잉주、인산전궁경평분、인산지정차이무통계학의의.채용t、x2검험혹Fisher정학개솔법비교2조잉부적인산성공솔、분면방식、산정시간급모인결국. 결과 Foley뇨관수낭조여보패생전조궁경평분개선、인산성공솔、음도분면솔、총산정、산후출혈량차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).Foley뇨관수낭조교보패생전조인산24 h내음도분면솔저[28.1%(18/64)여56.5%(35/62),t=10.37,P<0.05],궁축과빈과강발생솔야교저[0.0%(0/64)여17.7%(11/62),P<0.05],단축궁소사용솔고[87.5%(56/64)여21.0%(13/62),x2 =56.27,P<0.05].2조신생인Apgar평분、양수태분오염발생솔、신생인체중차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).2조잉부무일례발생산욕감염. 결론 엄격장악Foley뇨관수낭촉궁경성숙적지정급집행무균조작규정,가이취득여보패생전상사적촉관경성숙효과급인산모영결국,미발생과빈과강관축,구유안전성고급성본저렴등우점.
Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of Foley catheter(FC)and vaginal prostaglandin E2 suppository(PGE2,Propess)for cervical ripening and labor induction in fullterm pregnant women with unfavorable cervix.Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted.Women with a term or post-term,live,singleton fetus in cephalic presentation,intact membranes,Bishop score<6,not in labor,medically indicated for labor induction from June 2009 to December 2009 in Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School were randomly divided into two groups:FC group(n=64)and Propess group(n=62).In FC group,a 16-F Foley catheter was inserted into patient's cervical canal; once past the internal os,the balloon was inflated with 80 ml saline.Intravenous oxytocin was initiated after the balloon was spontaneously extruded from the cervix or after 24 hours.In Propess group,vaginal Propess was used.x2 or Fisher's exact test and t test were used to compare the outcomes,delivery mode and induction success rate between the two groups.Results There were no significant differences in gestational weeks,Bishop score,indication of induction,improvement of Bishop score,success rate of induction,rate of vaginal delivery,total duration of labor and volume of postpartum hemorrhage between the two groups(P > 0.05,respectively).Propess group had a higher rate of vaginal birth within 24 hours[56.5%(35/62)vs 28.1%(18/64),t=10.37,P<0.05],a higher risk for excessively frequent and hard uterine contraction[17.7%(11/62)vs 0.0%(0/64),P<0.05]and lower incidence of oxytocin induction/augmentation during labor[21.0%(13/62)vs 87.5%(56/64),x2 =56.27,P<0.05]than those of FC group.There were no differences in neonatal Apgar score,meconium staining and neonatal birth weight between the two groups.Puerperal infection occured in neither group.Conclusions Under strict control of indication and aseptic manipulation,Foley catheter was as effective and safe as Propess for cervical ripening with lower risk of excessive uterine activity.It is suggested that Foley catheter could be used for cervical ripening,especially in patients with economic difficulty.